A populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe

Party Politics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 563-575

  Rooduijn, Matthijs ^a   de Lange, Sarah L ^a   van der Brug, Wouter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

content analysis; mainstream parties; populism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902482472     PISSN: 13540688     EISSN: 14603683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354068811436065     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Abedi A,Lundberg TC.Doomed to failure? UKIP and the organisational challenges facing right-wing populist anti-political establishment parties.Parliamentary Affairs. 2009;62:72-87.
2. Abts K,Rummens S.Populism versus democracy.Political Studies. 2007;55:405-424.
3. Akkerman T.Friend or foe? Right-wing populism and the popular press in Britain and the Netherlands.Journalism. 2011;12:1-15.
4. Albertazzi D,McDonnell DTwenty-First Century Populism. Albertazzi DMcDonnell D, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:1-11.
5. Albertazzi D,McDonnell D.The Lega Nord back in government.West European Politics. 2010;33:1318-1340.
6. Bale T.Cinderella and her ugly sisters: The mainstream and extreme right in Europe's bipolarising party systems.West European Politics. 2003;26:67-90.
7. Bale T,Green-Pedersen C,Krouwel A,Luther KR,Sitter N.If you can't beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in Western Europe.Political Studies. 2010;58:410-426.
8. Barr RR.Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics.Party Politics. 2009;15:29-48.
9. Bos L,Van der Brug W,De Vreese C.How the media shape perceptions of right-wing populist leaders.Political Communication. 2011;28:182-206.
10. Budge I,Klingemann H-D,Volkens A,Bara J,Tanenbaum EMapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:.
11. Canovan MPopulism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1981:.
12. Canovan MDemocracies and the Populist Challenge. Mény YSurel Y, ed. New York: Palgrave; 2002:25-44.
13. Canovan M.Populism for political theorists?.Journal of Political Ideologies. 2004;9:241-252.
14. De Beus JDispersed Democratic Leadership: Origins, Dynamics, and Implications. Kane JPatapan Ht'Hart P, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:83-103.
15. Decker FTwenty-First Century Populism. Albertazzi DMcDonnell D, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:119-134.
16. De Lange SL,Rooduijn MDemocratie Doorgelicht. Andeweg RThomassen J, ed. Leiden: Leiden University Press; 2011:319-334.
17. Döring H,Manow P2010:.
18. Downs WM.Pariahs in their midst: Belgian and Norwegian parties react to extremist threats.West European Politics. 2001;24:23-42.
19. Fella STwenty-First Century Populism. Albertazzi DMcDonnell D, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:181-197.
20. Guthrie J,Petty R,Yongvanich K,Ricceri F.Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting.Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2004;5:282-293.
21. Harmel R,Janda K.An integrated theory of party goals and party change.Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1994;6:259-287.
22. Harmel R,Svåsand L.The influence of new parties on old parties' platforms: The cases of the Progress parties and Conservative parties of Denmark and Norway.Party Politics. 1997;3:315-340.
23. Harmel R,Heo U,Tan A,Janda K.Performance, leadership, factions and party change: An empirical analysis.West European Politics. 1995;18:1-33.
24. Hawkins KA.Is Chávez Populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective.Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42:1040-1067.
25. Hawkins KAVenezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:.
26. Heinisch R.Success in opposition - failure in government: Explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office.West European Politics. 2003;26:91-130.
27. Ionescu G,Gellner EPopulism: Its Meaning and National. Ionescu GGellner E, ed. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1969:1-5.
28. Jagers J,Walgrave S.Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties discourse in Belgium.European Journal of Political Research. 2007;46:319-345.
29. Janda K,Harmel R,Edens C,Goff P.Changes in party identity: Evidence from party manifestos.Party Politics. 1995;1:171-196.
30. Ji S.What do paragraph divisions indicate in narrative texts?.Journal of Pragmatics. 2008;40:1719-1730.
31. Klemmensen R,Binzer Hobolt S,Hansen ME.Estimating policy positions using political texts: An evaluation of the wordscores approach.Electoral Studies. 2007;26:746-755.
32. Klingemann H-D,Volkens A,Bara J,Budge I,McDonald MMapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:.
33. Koen F,Becker A,Young R.The psychological reality of the paragraph.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1969;8:49-53.
34. Krippendorff KHContent Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. London: Sage; 2004:.
35. Laclau EOn Populist Reason. London: Verso; 2005:.
36. Laver M,Garry J.Estimating policy positions from political texts.American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44:619-634.
37. Loxbo K.The impact of the radical right: Lessons from the local level in Sweden, 2002-2006.Scandinavian Political Studies. 2010;33:295-315.
38. Lucardie PTwenty-First Century Populism. Albertazzi DMcDonnell D, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:151-165.
39. Mair PDemocracies and the Populist Challenge. Mény YSurel Y, ed. New York: Palgrave; 2002:81-98.
40. March LSAIS Review. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007:63-77.
41. Mazzoleni GThe Media and Neo-Populism. Mazzoleni GStewart JHorsfield B, ed. London: Praeger; 2003:1-20.
42. Meguid BM.Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success.American Political Science Review. 2005;99:347-359.
43. Mény Y,Surel YDemocracies and the Populist Challenge. Mény YSurel Y, ed. New York: Palgrave; 2002:1-21.
44. Minkenberg M.The radical right in public office: Agenda-setting and policy effects.West European Politics. 2001;24:1-21.
45. Mudde C.The populist Zeitgeist.Government and Opposition. 2004;39:541-563.
46. Mudde CPopulist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
47. Otjes S2010:.
48. Panebianco APolitical Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988:.
49. Panizza FPopulism and the Mirror of Democracy. Panizza F, ed. London: Verso; 2005:1-31.
50. Pasquino GTwenty-First Century Populism. Albertazzi DMcDonnell D, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:15-29.
51. Pauwels Teun.Measuring populism: A quantitative text analysis of party literature in Belgium.Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 2011;21:97-119.
52. Rooduijn M,Pauwels T.Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis.West European Politics. 2011;34:1272-1283.
53. Ruzza C,Fella S.Populism and the Italian right.Acta Politica. 2011;46:158-179.
54. Rydgren JTwenty-First Century Populism. Albertazzi DMcDonnell D, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:166-180.
55. Schlesinger JA.On the theory of party organization.Journal of Politics. 1984;46:369-400.
56. Stanley B.The thin ideology of populism.Journal of Political Ideologies. 2008;13:95-110.
57. Surel YDemocracies and the Populist Challenge. Mény YSurel Y, ed. New York: Palgrave; 2002:139-154.
58. Taggart P.New populist parties in Western Europe.West European Politics. 1995;18:34-51.
59. Taggart PPopulism. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000:.
60. Taguieff P-A.Political science confronts populism: From a conceptual mirage to a real problem.Telos. 1995;103:9-43.
61. Tarchi MDemocracies and the Populist Challenge. Mény YSurel Y, ed. New York: Palgrave; 2002:120-138.
62. Tarchi MTwenty-First Century Populism. Albertazzi DMcDonnell D, ed. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan; 2008:84-99.
63. Van der Brug W.How the LPF fuelled discontent: Empirical tests of explanations of LPF support.Acta Politica. 2003;38:89-106.
64. Van der Brug W,Mughan A.Charisma, leader effects and support for right-wing populist parties.Party Politics. 2007;13:29-51.
65. Van der Brug W,Fennema M,van Heerden S,de Lange SL.Hoe Heeft het Integratiedebat Zich in Nederland Ontwikkeld?.Migrantenstudies. 2009;25:198-220.
66. Van der Pas D,de Vries C,van der Brug W.A leader without a party: Exploring the relationship between Geert Wilder's leadership performance in the media and his electoral success.Party Politics. forthcoming;:.
67. Van Kessel S.Explaining the electoral performance of populist parties: The Netherlands as a case study.Perspectives on European Politics and Society. 2011;12:68-88.
68. Van Spanje J.Contagious parties: Anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe.Party Politics. 2010;16:563-586.
69. Van Spanje J,van der Brug W.Being intolerant of the intolerant. The exclusion of Western European anti-immigration parties and its consequences for party choice.Acta Politica. 2009;44:353-384.
70. Vliegenthart RFraming Immigration and Integration. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit; 2007:.
71. Voerman G.Van Mao tot marketing: Over het populisme van de SP.Socialisme en Democratie. 2009;9:26-31.
72. Vossen K.Populism in the Netherlands after Fortuyn: Rita Verdonk and Geert Wilders Compared.Perspectives on European Politics and Society. 2010;11:22-38.
73. Weber RPBasic Content Analysis. London: Sage; 1990:.
74. Weyland K.Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics.Comparative Politics. 2001;34:1-22.
75. Zaslove A.Here to stay? Populism as a new party type.European Review. 2008;16:319-336.