Estimating policy positions using political texts: An evaluation of the Wordscores approach

Electoral Studies

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 746-755

  Klemmensen, Robert ^a   Hobolt, Sara Binzer ^b   Hansen, Martin Ejnar ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Comparative Manifesto Project; Content analysis; Measurement; Party positions; Wordscores

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION METHOD; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PARTY POLITICS; POLITICAL DISCOURSE;

DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 36248935582     PISSN: 02613794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Armstrong, D., Bakker, R., 2006. Take that you Lousy dimension: a new model for manifesto-based left-right party placement. Unpublished working paper, University of Oxford.
2. Andersen J.G. Decline of class voting or change in class voting - social class and party choice in Denmark in the 1970s. European Journal of Political Research 12 3 (1984) 43-259
3. Bakker, R., Edwards, E., de Vries, C., 2006. Fickle parties of changing dimensions? Testing the Comparability of the Party Manifesto Data Across Time and Space, Paper presented at the MPSA conference, Chicago.
4. Benoit K., and Laver M. Estimating party policy positions: comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies 26 1 (2007) 90-107
5. Benoit K., and Laver M. Benchmarks for text analysis: a response to Budge and Pennings. Electoral Studies 26 1 (2007) 130-135
6. Benoit K., and Laver M. Party Policy in Modern Democracies (2006), Routledge, London
7. Benoit K., and Laver M. Estimating Irish party positions using computer wordscoring: the 2002 elections. Irish Political Studies 18 1 (2003) 97-107
8. Borre O. Old and new politics in Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies 18 3 (1995) 187-195
9. Budge I., and Farlie D.J. Explaining and predicting elections. Issue Effect and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies (1983), Allen and Unwin, London
10. Budge I., and Klingemann H.D. Finally! Comparative over-time mapping of party policy movement. In: Budge I., Klingemann H.-D., Volkens A., Bara J., and Tannenbaum E. (Eds). Mapping Policy Preferences: Parties, Electors and Governments: 1945-1998 (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Budge I., Klingemann H.-D., Volkens A., Bara J., and Tannenbaum E. Mapping Policy Preferences: Parties, Electors and Governments: 1945-1998 (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford
12. Budge I., and Pennings P. Do they work? Validating computerised word frequency estimates against long policy series. Electoral Studies 26 1 (2007) 121-129
13. Budge I., and Pennings P. Missing the message and shooting the messenger: Benoit and Laver's "response". Electoral Studies 26 1 (2007) 136-141
14. In: Budge I., Robertson D., and Hearl D. (Eds). Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies (1987), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
15. Castles F., and Mair P. Left-right political scales - some expert judgement. European Journal of Political Research 12 1 (1984) 73-88
16. Damgaard E. Denmark: the life and death of government coaltions'. In: Müller W.C., and Strøm K. (Eds). Coalition Governments in Western Europe (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
17. Gabel M., and Huber J. Putting parties in their place: inferring ideological positions from party manifesto data. American Journal of Political Science 44 1 (2000) 94-103
18. Giannetti D., and Laver M. Policy position and jobs in the government. European Journal of Political Research 44 1 (2005) 91-120
19. Green-Pedersen C. Minority governments and party politics: the political and institutional background to the Danish miracle. Journal of Public Policy 21 1 (2001) 53-70
20. Hobolt S.B., and Klemmensen R. Responsive government? Public opinion and policy preferences in Britain and Denmark. Political Studies 53 (2005) 379-402
21. Huber J.D., and Inglehart R. Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 countries. Party Politics 1 1 (1995) 73-111
22. Janda K. Political Parties. A Cross-national Survey (1980), Free Press, New York
23. Klingemann H.-D., Volkens A., Bara J., Budge I., and McDonald M.D. Mapping policy preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003 (2007), Oxford University Press, Oxford
24. Klingemann H.-D., Hofferbert R., and Budge I. Parties, Policies and Democraies (1994), Westview Press, Boulder
25. Laver M. Why should we estimate the policy position of political actors?. In: Laver M. (Ed). Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors (2001), Routledge, London
26. Laver M., and Benoit K. Locating TDs in policy spaces: wordscoring dáil speeches. Irish Political Studies 17 1 (2002) 59-73
27. Laver M., Benoit K., and Garry J. Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review 97 2 (2003) 311-331
28. Laver M., Benoit K., and Sauger N. Policy competition in the 2002 French Legislative and Presidential Elections. European Journal of Political Research 45 4 (2006) 667-697
29. Laver M., and Garry J. Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2000) 619-634
30. Laver M., and Hunt W.B. Policy and Party Competition (1992), Routledge, New York
31. Mader E. SF under det "røde" cabinet (1979), Odense University Press, Odense
32. Mair P. Searching for the positions of political actors: a review of approaches and a critical evaluation of expert surveys. In: Laver M. (Ed). Estimating the policy positions of political actors (2001), Routledge, London
33. In: Marks G. (Ed). Estimating error in measures of party positioning: expert, manifesto, and survey data compared. Electoral Studies 26 1 (2007) 1-141 (Special issue)
34. Marks G., and Steenbergen M. Chapel Hill Party Dataset 2002 (2002), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Available from: http://www.unc.edu/∼gwmarks/data.htm
35. Marks G., Hooghe L., Steenbergen M., and Bakker B. Cross-validating data on party positioning on European integration. Electoral Studies 26 1 (2007) 23-38
36. Martin, L.W., Vanberg, G. A robust transformation procedure for interpreting political text. Political Analysis, in press.
37. Morgan, M.-J., 1976. The modelling of governmental coalition formation: a policy-based approach with interval measurement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
38. Rasmussen H., and Rüdiger M. Tiden efter 1945 (1990), Gyldendal, Copenhagen
39. Riker W.B. The Strategy of Rhetoric (1996), Princeton University Press, New Haven
40. Volkens A. Manifesto research from 1979: from reliability to validity. In: Laver M. (Ed). Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors (2001), Routledge, London