Considerations for test design to accommodate energy-budget models in ecotoxicology: A case study for acetone in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1466-1475

  Barsi, Alpar ^a   Jager, Tjalling ^b   Collinet, Marc ^a   Lagadic, Laurent ^a   Ducrot, Virginie ^a  

^a Ecology and Ecosystem Health   (France)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aquatic invertebrates; DEBkiss; Ecotoxicology; Mechanistic effect models; Narcotic; Toxicity mechanisms; Toxicodynamics; Toxicokinetics

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; ANIMALS; BUDGET CONTROL; CALIBRATION; DESIGN; ECOLOGY; LAKES; MOLLUSCS; RESEARCH; TOXICITY;

AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES; DEBKISS; ECO-TOXICOLOGY; MECHANISTIC EFFECTS; NARCOTIC; TOXICITY MECHANISMS; TOXICODYNAMICS; TOXICOKINETICS;

TESTING;

ACETONE;

ACETONE; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENERGY BUDGET; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; POLLUTION MONITORING; POND; SNAIL;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; EMBRYO; ENERGY; LYMNAEA STAGNALIS; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL;

AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES; DEBKISS; ECOTOXICOLOGY; MECHANISTIC EFFECT MODELS; NARCOTIC; TOXICITY MECHANISMS; TOXICODYNAMICS; TOXICOKINETICS;

ACETONE; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOTOXICOLOGY; LYMNAEA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OVUM; PONDS; REPRODUCTION; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84902477465     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2399     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Giusti A, Barsi A, Dugué M, Collinet M, Thomé J-P, Joaquim-Justo C, Roig B, Lagadic L, Ducrot V. 2013. Reproductive impacts of tributyltin (TBT) and triphenyltin (TPT) in the hermaphroditic freshwater gastropod Lymnaea stagnalis. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:1552-1560.
2. International Organization for Standardization. 2006. Water quality. Guidance on statistical interpretation of ecotoxicity data. ISO 20281. Berlin, Germany.
3. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2006. Current approaches in the statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data: A guidance to application. Series on testing and assessment 54. Paris, France.
4. Ashauer R, Escher BI. 2010. Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment. J Environ Monit 12:2056-2061.
5. Jager T, Heugens EW, Kooijman SALM. 2006. Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models. Ecotoxicology 15:305-314.
6. Hunka AD, Meli M, Thit A, Palmqvist A, Thorbek P, Forbes VE. 2013. Stakeholders' perspective on ecological modeling in environmental risk assessment of pesticides: Challenges and opportunities. Risk Analysis 33:68-79.
7. European Commission. 2012. Preliminary report on addressing the new challenges for risk assessment. Brussels, Belgium.
8. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2010. Detailed review paper on molluscs life-cycle toxicity testing. Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 121. ENV/JM/MONO (2010) 9. Paris, France.
9. Kooijman SALM. 2001. Quantitative aspects of metabolic organization: A discussion of concepts. Philos T Roy Soc B 356:331-349.
10. Jager T, Martin BT, Zimmer EI. 2013. DEBkiss or the quest for the simplest generic model of animal life history. J Theor Biol 328:9-18.
11. Jager T, Zimmer EI. 2012. Simplified dynamic energy budget model for analysing ecotoxicity data. Ecol Model 225:74-81.
12. Kooijman SALM, Bedaux JJM. 1996. Analysis of toxicity tests on fish growth. Water Res 30:1633-1644.
13. Kooijman SALM, Bedaux JJM. 1996. Analysis of toxicity tests on Daphnia survival and reproduction. Water Res 30:1711-1723.
14. Sousa T, Domingos T, Poggiale J-C, Kooijman SALM. 2010. Dynamic energy budget theory restores coherence in biology. Philos T Roy Soc B 365:3413-3428.
15. Alda Álvarez O, Jager T, Redondo EM, Kammenga JE. 2006. Physiological modes of action of toxic chemicals in the nematode Acrobeloides nanus. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:3230-3237.
16. Jager T, Albert C, Preuss TG, Ashauer R. 2011. General unified threshold model of survival-A toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology. Environ Sci Technol 45:2529-2540.
17. Jumel A, Coutellec M-A, Cravedi J-P, Lagadic L. 2002. Nonylphenol polyethoxylate adjuvant mitigates the reproductive toxicity of fomesafen on the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis in outdoor experimental ponds. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1876-1888.
18. Bluzat R, Jonot O, Lespinasse G, Seugé J. 1979. Chronic toxicity of acetone in the fresh water snail Lymnea stagnalis. Toxicology 14:179-190.
19. Hoffer JNA, Schwegler D, Ellers J, Koene JM. 2012. Mating rate influences female reproductive investment in a simultaneous hermaphrodite, Lymnaea stagnalis. Anim Behav 84:523-529.
20. Bandow C, Weltje L. 2012. Development of an embryo toxicity test with the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis using the model substance tributyltin and common solvents. Sci Total Environ 435-436:90-95.
21. van Duivenboden YA. 1983. Transfer of semen accelerates the onset of egg-laying in female copulants of the hermaphrodite freshwater snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Int J Inver Rep 6:249-257.
22. Escobar JS, Auld JR, Correa AC, Alonso JM, Bony YK, Coutellec M-A, Koene JM, Pointier J-P, Jarne P, David P. 2011. Patterns of mating-system evolution in hermaphroditic animals: Correlations among selfing rate, inbreeding depression, and the timing of reproduction. Evolution 65:1233-1253.
23. Jager T. 2013. Making Sense of Chemical Stress: Applications of Dynamic Energy Budget Theory in Ecotoxicology and Stress Ecology, version 14. [cited 2013 October 14]. Available from: http://www.debtox.info/book.php.
24. Zimmer E, Jager T, Ducrot V, Lagadic L, Kooijman SALM. 2012. Juvenile food limitation in standardized tests: A warning to ecotoxicologists. Ecotoxicology 21:2195-2204.
25. Jager T, Barsi A, Ducrot V. 2013. Hormesis on life-history traits: Is there such thing as a free lunch? Ecotoxicology 22:1-8.
26. Pieters B, Jager T, Kraak MS, Admiraal W. 2006. Modeling responses of Daphnia magna to pesticide pulse exposure under varying food conditions: Intrinsic versus apparent sensitivity. Ecotoxicology 15:601-608.
27. European Commission. 2002. Guidance document on aquatic ecotoxicology in the context of the Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/3268/2001. Brussels, Belgium.
28. Martin B, Jager T, Nisbet R, Preuss T, Hammers-Wirtz M, Grimm V. 2013. Extrapolating ecotoxicological effects from individuals to populations: A generic approach based on dynamic energy budget theory and individual-based modeling. Ecotoxicology 22:574-583.
29. Muller E, Osenberg C, Schmitt R, Holbrook S, Nisbet R. 2010. Sublethal toxicant effects with dynamic energy budget theory: Application to mussel outplants. Ecotoxicology 19:38-47.
30. Marois R, Croll RP. 1991. Hatching asynchrony within the egg mass of the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Invertebr Reprod Dev 19:139-146.
31. Albert C, Ashauer R, Künsch HR, Reichert P. 2012. Bayesian experimental design for a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic model. J Stat Plan Inference 142:263-275.
32. Ashauer R, Boxall A, Brown C. 2006. Predicting effects on aquatic organisms from fluctuating or pulsed exposure to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1899-1912.
33. Jager T. 2013. All individuals are not created equal: Accounting for interindividual variation in fitting life-history responses to toxicants. Environ Sci Technol 47:1664-1669.
34. Zimmer EI. 2013. The pond snail under stress: Interactive effects of food limitation, toxicants and copulation explained by Dynamic Energy Budget theory. PhD thesis. VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 33-40.
35. Jager T, Barsi A, Hamda NT, Martin BT, Zimmer EI, Ducrot V. 2014. Dynamic energy budgets in population ecotoxicology: Applications and outlook. Ecol Model 280:140-147.