Source attribution of human campylobacteriosis in Denmark

Epidemiology and Infection

Volumn 142, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1599-1608

  Boysen, L ^a   Rosenquist, H ^a   Larsson, J T ^b   Nielsen, E M ^b   Sorensen, G ^a   Nordentoft, S ^a   Hald, T ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b STATENS SERUM INSTITUT   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Campylobacter; foodborne zoonoses; modelling; molecular epidemiology; zoonotic foodborne diseases

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CHLORAMPHENICOL; CIPROFLOXACIN; ERYTHROMYCIN; GENTAMICIN; NALIDIXIC ACID; STREPTOMYCIN; TETRACYCLINE;

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; CAMPYLOBACTER; CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI; CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS; CATTLE; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; DISEASE CARRIER; FLAA GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION (SPECIES); HUMAN; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; NONHUMAN; SWINE; BROILER; FLAA TYPING; IMPORT DISEASE; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; MOLECULAR TYPING; SOURCE ATTRIBUTION; TRAVEL; ZOONOSIS;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CAMPYLOBACTER; CAMPYLOBACTER INFECTIONS; CATTLE; CHICKENS; DENMARK; DISEASE RESERVOIRS; FLAGELLIN; FOODBORNE DISEASES; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING;

EID: 84902437179     PISSN: 09502688     EISSN: 14694409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268813002719     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anon. Annual Report on Zoonoses in Denmark 2010. Ministry of Family and Consumer Affairs, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.
2. European Food Safety Authority. The Community Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic Agents in the European Union in 2009. EFSA Journal 2011; 9(3): 2090.
3. WHO. Campylobacter, Fact sheet no. 255 (http://www. who.int/mediacentre/ factsheets/fs255/en/index.html#). Accessed November 2011.
4. Nielsen EM, Engberg J, Madsen M. Distribution of serotypes of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli from Danish patients, poultry, cattle and swine. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 1997; 19: 47-56.
5. Miller WG, Mandrell RE. Prevalence of Campylobacter in the food and water supply: incidence, outbreaks, isolation and detection. In: Ketley JM, Konkel ME, eds. Campylobacter-Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1st edn. Wymondham, Norfolk, UK: Horizon Bioscience, 2005, pp. 101-163.
6. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific opinion on quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis in the EU. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(1): 1437.
7. Ethelberg S, et al. Salmonella and campylobacter infections in 2008 [in Danish]. Ugeskrift for Laeger 2010; 172: 1451-1455.
8. Wingstrand A, et al. Fresh chicken as main risk factor for campylobacteriosis, Denmark. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2006; 12: 280-285.
9. European Food Safety Authority. The Community Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses
10. Zoonotic Agents and Antimicrobial Resistance in the European Union in 2006. EFSA Journal; 2007. Report No. 130.
11. Rosenquist H, et al. Danish strategies to control Campylobacter in broilers and broiler meat: facts and effects. Epidemiology and Infection 2009; 137: 1742-1750.
12. Wegener HC, et al. Salmonella control programs in Denmark. EmergingInfectious Diseases 2003;9:774-780.
13. Pires SM, et al. Attributing the human disease burden of foodborne infections to specific sources. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2009; 6: 417-424.
14. Wilson DJ, et al. Tracing the source of campylobacter-iosis. PLoS Genetics 2008; 4: e1000203.
15. Mullner P, et al. Assigning the source of human campy-lobacteriosis in New Zealand: a comparative genetic and epidemiological approach. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 2009; 9: 1311-1319.
16. European Food Safety Authority. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses in the EU, 2008, Part A: Campylobacter and Salmonella prevalence estimates. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(03): 1503.
17. Anon. DANMAP 2008-Use of antimicrobial agents and occurence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, foods and humans in Denmark. Søborg, Denmark, 2009.
18. Dingle KE, et al. Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2001; 39: 14-23.
19. Meinersmann RJ, et al. Discrimination of Campylo-bacter jejuni isolates by fla gene sequencing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1997; 35: 2810-2814.
20. Jolley KA, Maiden MC. BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11: 595.
21. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 1992; 131: 479-491.
22. Hald T, et al. A Bayesian approach to quantify the contribution of animal-food sources to human salmonel-losis. Risk Analysis 2004; 24: 255-269.
23. Müllner P. Estimating the contribution of different sources to the burden of human campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2009, 231 pp.
24. Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 1992; 7: 457-511.
25. Anon. Annual Report on Zoonoses in Denmark 2003. Ministry of Family and Consumer Affairs, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2004.
26. Anon. Annual Report on Zoonoses in Denmark 2004. Ministry of Family and Consumer Affairs, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2005.
27. Evers EG, et al. Campylobacter source attribution by exposure assessment. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 2008; 8: 174-190.
28. Anon. Annual Report on Zoonoses in Denmark 2009. Ministry of Family and Consumer Affairs, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010.
29. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Scientific Opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain. EFSA Journal 2011; 9(4): 2105.
30. Jeppesen VF, Guldbæk I. Screening for Campylobacter in drinking water. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2006. Report No. 1081.
31. Hald B, et al. Longitudinal study of the excretion patterns of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in young pet dogs in Denmark. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2004; 42: 2003-2012.
32. Burnens AP, Angeloz-Wick B, Nicolet J. Comparison of Campylobacter carriage rates in diarrheic and healthy pet animals. Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin B 1992; 39: 175-180.
33. Wieland B, et al. Campylobacter spp. in dogs and cats in Switzerland: risk factor analysis and molecular characterization with AFLP. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B, Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health 2005; 52: 183-189.
34. Ogden ID, et al. Campylobacter excreted into the environment by animal sources: prevalence, concentration shed, and host association. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2009; 6: 1161-1170.
35. Sheppard SK, et al. Campylobacter genotyping to determine the source of human infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009; 48: 1072-1078.
36. Sears A, et al. Marked campylobacteriosis decline after interventions aimed at poultry, New Zealand. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2011; 17: 1007-1015.
37. Mullner P, et al. Molecular and spatial epidemiology of human campylobacteriosis: source association and genotype-related risk factors. Epidemiology and Infection 2010; 138: 1372-1383.
38. Strachan NJ, et al. Attribution of Campylobacter infections in northeast Scotland to specific sources by use of multilocus sequence typing. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2009; 199: 1205-1208.