Resting cardiac 64-MDCT does not reliably detect myocardial ischemia identified by radionuclide imaging

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 200, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 337-342

  Spiro, Ari J ^a   Haramati, Linda B ^a   Jain, Vineet R ^a   Godelman, Alla ^a   Travin, Mark I ^a   Levsky, Jeffrey M ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac CT; Myocardial enhancement; Myocardial ischemia; Resting CT perfusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 84873604443     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.8171     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2011 update - a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123:e18-e209
2. Kannel WB. Overview of atherosclerosis. Clin Ther 1998; 20:B2-B17
3. Marcassa C, Bax JJ, Bengel F, et al; European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC); European Society of Cardiology Working Group 5 (Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT); European Association of Nuclear Medicine Cardiovascular Committee. Clinical value, cost-effectiveness, and safety of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: a position statement. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:557-563
4. Hansen CL, Goldstein RA, Akinboboye OO, et al; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Myocardial perfusion and function: single photon emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2007; 14:e39-e60
5. Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:2614-2662
6. Ambrose MS, Valdiviezo C, Mehra V, Lardo AC, Lima JA, George RT. CT perfusion: ready for prime time. Curr Cardiol Rep 2011; 13:57-66
7. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Adenosine stress 64-and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2:174-182
8. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:1072-1084
9. Okada DR, Ghoshhajra BB, Blankstein R, et al. Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2010; 17:27-37
10. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010; 254:410-419
11. Cury RC, Magalhães TA, Borges AC, et al. Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106:310-315
12. Tamarappoo BK, Dey D, Nakazato R, et al. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3:1010-1019
13. Patel AR, Lodato JA, Chandra S, et al. Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities using ultra-low radiation dose regadenoson stress multidetector computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011; 5:247-254
14. Stanton CL, Haramati LB, Berko NS, et al. Normal myocardial perfusion on 64-detector resting cardiac CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011; 5:52-60
15. Nagao M, Matsuoka H, Kawakami H, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion by contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT: characterization of ischemic myocardium. AJR 2008; 191:19-25
16. Nagao M, Matsuoka H, Kawakami H, et al. Detection of myocardial ischemia using 64-slice MDCT. Circ J 2009; 73:905-911
17. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104:318-326
18. Holly TA, Abbott BG, Al-Mallah M, et al; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Single photon-emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2010; 17:941-973
19. Dilsizian V, Bacharach SL, Beanlands SR, et al. PET myocardial perfusion and metabolism clinical imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009; 16:651
20. Port SC. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 1999; 6:G47-G84
21. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al; American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105:539-542
22. Jacobi AH, Gohari A, Zalta B, Stein MW, Haramati LB. Ventricular myocardial fat: CT findings and clinical correlates. J Thorac Imaging 2007; 22:130-135
23. Ahn SS, Young-Jin K, Hur J, et al. CT detection of subendocardial fat in myocardial infarction. AJR 2009; 192:532-537
24. Ichikawa Y, Kitagawa K, Chino S, et al. Adipose tissue detected by multislice computed tomography in patients after myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2:548-555
25. Boll DT, Merkle EM, Paulson EK, Hoffman MH. Assessment of the myocardium on 2-phase cardiac multidetector computed tomography: does cyclic contraction influence myocardial attenuation? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32:602-608
26. Toyota E, Ogasawara Y, Hiramatsu O, et al. Dynamic of flow velocities in endocardial and epicardial coronary arterioles. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005; 288:H1598-H1603
27. Iskandrian AS. Myocardial ischemia during pharmacological stress testing. Circulation 1993; 87:1415-1417
28. Baile EM, Pare PD, D'Yachkova Y, Carere RG. Effect of contrast media on coronary vascular resistance: contrast-induced coronary vasodilation. Chest 1999; 116:1039-1045
29. Blankstein R, Rogers IS, Cury RC. Practical tips and tricks in cardiovascular computed tomography: diagnosis of myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009; 3:104-111
30. Rodríguez-Granillo GA, Rosales MA, Renes P, et al. Chronic myocardial infarction detection and characterization during coronary artery calcium scoring acquisitions. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010; 4:99-107
31. Zoghbi GJ, Dorfman TA, Iskandrian AE. The effects of medications on myocardial perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52:401-416