Detection of myocardial ischemia using 64-slice MDCT - Comparison with stress/rest myocardial scintigraphy

Circulation Journal

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 905-911

  Nagao, Michinobu ^a   Matsuoka, Hiroshi ^b   Kawakami, Hideo ^b   Higashino, Hiroshi ^a   Mochizuki, Teruhito ^a   Ohshita, Akira ^b   Kohno, Tamami ^b   Shigemi, Susumu ^b  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Prefectural Ehime Imabari Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

64 slice MDCT; Myocardial ischemia; Myocardial scintigraphy

Indexed keywords

ATENOLOL; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM; THALLIUM 201;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HEART STRESS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; REST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; SYSTOLE;

ADENOSINE; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFACTS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLE; THALLIUM RADIOISOTOPES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 65649087485     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0940     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552-557. (Pubitemid 41040301)
2. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, van Mieghem C, Meijboom WB, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 575-582. (Pubitemid 44149369)
3. Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Maurovich-Horvat P, Hoffmann U, Pena AJ, Cury RC, et al. Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 373-379. (Pubitemid 43254917)
4. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gasper T, Jaffe R, Karkabi B, Flugelman MY, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 2007; 115: 1762-1768. (Pubitemid 46648613)
5. Huang WC, Wu MT, Chiou KR, Mar GY, Hsiao SH, Lin SK, et al. Assessing culprit lesions and active complex lesions in patients with early acute myocardial infarction by multidetector computed tomography. Circ J 2008; 72: 1806-1813.
6. Tanaka A, Shimada K, Yoshida K, Jissyo S, Tanaka H, Sakamoto M, et al. Non-invasive assessment of plaque rupture by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circ J 2008; 72: 1276-1281.
7. Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, Weustink AC, van Geuns RJ, Mollet NR, et al. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 144-152. (Pubitemid 43929221)
8. Brodoefel H, Klumpp B, Reimann A, Ohmer M, Fenchel M, Schroeder S, et al. Late myocardial enhancement assessed by 64-MSCT in reperfused porcine myocardial infarction: Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 475-483. (Pubitemid 46140318)
9. Lessick J, Dragu R, Mutlak D, Rispler S, Beyar R, Litmanovich D, et al. Is functional improvement after myocardial infarction predicted with myocardial enhancement patterns at multidetector CT? Radiology 2007; 244: 736-744. (Pubitemid 47292084)
10. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, Haraikawa T, Suzuki J, Shigematsu Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: Alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 2005; 695: 550-557. (Pubitemid 40745727)
11. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, Kitagawa K, Bluemke DA, Lima JA, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 815-822. (Pubitemid 350126563)
12. Kido T, Kurata A, Higashino H, Inoue Y, Kanza RE, Okayama H, et al. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using first-pass multidetector-row computed tomography and adenosine triphosphate in coronary artery disease. Circ J 2008; 72: 1276-1281.
13. Goto M, Flynn AE, Doucette JW, Jansen CM, Stork MM, Coggins DL, et al. Cardiac contraction affects deep myocardial vessels predominantly. Am J Physiol 1991; 261: 1417-1429.
14. Iwanaga S, Ewing SG, Husseini WK, Hoffman JI. Changes in contractility and afterload have only slight effects on subendocardial flow impediment. Am J Physiol 1995; 269: 1202-1212.
15. Sabbah HM, Stein PD. Effect of acute regional ischemia on pressure in the subepicardium and subendocardium. Am J Physiol 1982; 242: 240-244.
16. Chilian WM. Microvascular pressures and resistances in the left ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium. Circ Res 1991; 69: 561-570.
17. Toyota E, Fujimoto K, Ogasawara Y, Kajita T, Shigeto F, Matsumoto T, et al. Dynamic changes in three-dimensional architecture and vascular volume of transmural coronary microvasculature between diastolic-and systolic-arrested rat hearts. Circulation 2002; 105: 621-626. (Pubitemid 34123438)
18. Nagao M, Matsuoka H, Kawakami H, Higashino H, Mochizuki T, Murase K et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion by contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT: Characterization of ischemic myocardium. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 19-25.
19. Klocker FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging. Circulation 2003; 108: 1404-1418.
20. Nishimura S, Mahmarian JJ, Boyce TM, Verani MS. Quantitative thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography during maximal pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation with adenosine for assessing coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 736-745.
21. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. J Nucl Cardiol 2002; 9: 240-245.
22. Austin WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: Report of the Ad-Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery. Circulation 1975; 51: 5-40.
23. Scoblionko DP, Brown BG, Mitten S, Caldwell JH, Kennedy JW, Bolson EL, et al. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: Comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 689-693. (Pubitemid 14154677)
24. Iskandrian AE. Myocardial ischemia during pharmacological stress testing. Circulation 1993; 87: 1415-1417. (Pubitemid 23110416)
25. Merkus D, Vergroesen I, Hiramatsu O, Tachibana H, Nakamoto H, Toyota E, et al. Stenosis differentially affects subendocardial and subepicardial arterioles in vivo. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2001; 280: 1674-1682. (Pubitemid 32466202)