Optimization of a pentaplex panel for MSI analysis without control DNA in a Brazilian population: Correlation with ancestry markers

European Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 875-880

  Campanella, Nathália C ^a   Berardinelli, Gustavo N ^a   Scapulatempo Neto, Cristovam ^a   Viana, Danilo ^a   Palmero, Edenir I ^a   Pereira, Rui ^b   Reis, Rui M ^a,c  

^a BARRETOS CANCER HOSPITAL   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Ancestry; Microsatellite instability; Quasi monomorphic variation range

Indexed keywords

DNA; TUMOR MARKER;

ADULT; AFRICAN BRAZILIAN; ALLELE; AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BRAZIL; CANCER PATIENT; CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS; CAUCASIAN; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; METHODOLOGY; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLEX POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUASIMONOMORPHIC VARIATION RANGE; YOUNG ADULT; BLACK PERSON; CACO 2 CELL LINE; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ADULT; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BRAZIL; CACO-2 CELLS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; MULTIPLEX POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84902357363     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.256     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Karran P: Microsatellite instability and DNA mismatch repair in human cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 1996; 7: 15-24
2. Vilar E, Gruber SB: Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-The stable evidence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010; 7: 153-162
3. Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR et al: A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: Development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 5248-5257. (Pubitemid 28521189
4. Viana-Pereira M, Lee A, Popov S et al: Microsatellite instability in pediatric high grade glioma is associated with genomic profile and differential target gene inactivation. PLoS One 2011; 6: E20588
5. Boland CR, Goel A: Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2073-2087, e2073
6. Thibodeau SN, Bren G, Schaid D: Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science 1993; 260: 816-819. (Pubitemid 23167612
7. Vilkki S, Launonen V, Karhu A, Sistonen P, Vastrik I, Aaltonen LA: Screening for microsatellite instability target genes in colorectal cancers. J Med Genet 2002; 39: 785-789. (Pubitemid 35346945
8. Suraweera N, Duval A, Reperant M et al: Evaluation of tumor microsatellite instability using five quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats and pentaplex PCR. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 1804-1811. (Pubitemid 35408304
9. Fearon ER: Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Annu Rev Pathol 2011; 6: 479-507
10. Calin GA, Gafa R, Tibiletti MG et al: Genetic progression in microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) colon cancers correlates with clinico-pathological parameters: A study of the TGRbetaRII, BAX, hMSH3, hMSH6, IGFIIR and BLM genes. Int J Cancer 2000; 89: 230-235. (Pubitemid 30430738
11. Jass JR, Do KA, Simms LA et al: Morphology of sporadic colorectal cancer with DNA replication errors. Gut 1998; 42: 673-679. (Pubitemid 28261055
12. Ribic CM, Sargent DJ, Moore MJ et al: Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 247-257. (Pubitemid 36859476
13. Sinicrope FA, Sargent DJ: Molecular pathways: Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: Prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic implications. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 1506-1512
14. Vilar E, Tabernero J: Molecular dissection of microsatellite instable colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov 2013; 3: 502-511
15. Dorard C, de Thonel A, Collura A et al: Expression of a mutant HSP110 sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to chemotherapy and improves disease prognosis. Nat Med 2011; 17: 1283-1289
16. Alhopuro P, Sammalkorpi H, Niittymaki I et al: Candidate driver genes in microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2012; 130: 1558-1566
17. Mori Y, Yin J, Rashid A et al: Instabilotyping: Comprehensive identification of frameshift mutations caused by coding region microsatellite instability. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 6046-6049. (Pubitemid 32762537
18. Oliveira C, Pinto M, Duval A et al: BRAF mutations characterize colon but not gastric cancer with mismatch repair deficiency. Oncogene 2003; 22: 9192-9196. (Pubitemid 38067995
19. Parsons DW, Wang TL, Samuels Y et al: Colorectal cancer: Mutations in a signalling pathway. Nature 2005; 436: 792. (Pubitemid 41160630
20. Goel A, Arnold CN, Niedzwiecki D et al: Frequent inactivation of PTEN by promoter hypermethylation in microsatellite instability-high sporadic colorectal cancers. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 3014-3021. (Pubitemid 38581399
21. Koopman M, Kortman GA, Mekenkamp L et al: Deficient mismatch repair system in patients with sporadic advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2009; 100: 266-273
22. Roth AD, Tejpar S, Delorenzi M et al: Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: Results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 466-474
23. Elsaleh H, Joseph D, Grieu F, Zeps N, Spry N, Iacopetta B: Association of tumour site and sex with survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Lancet 2000; 355: 1745-1750. (Pubitemid 30265078
24. Sargent DJ, Marsoni S, Monges G et al: Defective mismatch repair as a predictive marker for lack of efficacy of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy in colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3219-3226
25. Sinicrope FA, Foster NR, Thibodeau SN et al: DNA mismatch repair status and colon cancer recurrence and survival in clinical trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 863-875
26. Des Guetz G, Schischmanoff O, Nicolas P, Perret GY, Morere JF, Uzzan B: Does microsatellite instability predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer?. A systematic review with meta-Analysis. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 1890-1896
27. Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP et al: Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 261-268. (Pubitemid 38256271
28. Buhard O, Cattaneo F, Wong YF et al: Multipopulation analysis of polymorphisms in five mononucleotide repeats used to determine the microsatellite instability status of human tumors. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 241-251. (Pubitemid 46622053
29. Goel A, Nagasaka T, Hamelin R, Boland CR: An optimized pentaplex PCR for detecting DNA mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: E9393
30. Patil DT, Bronner MP, Portier BP, Fraser CR, Plesec TP, Liu X: A five-marker panel in a multiplex PCR accurately detects microsatellite instability-high colorectal tumors without control DNA. Diagn Mol Pathol 2012; 21: 127-133
31. Viana-Pereira M, Almeida I, Sousa S et al: Analysis of microsatellite instability in medulloblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2009; 11: 458-467
32. Xicola RM, Llor X, Pons E et al: Performance of different microsatellite marker panels for detection of mismatch repair-deficient colorectal tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 244-252
33. Pereira R, Phillips C, Pinto N et al: Straightforward inference of ancestry and admixture proportions through ancestry-informative insertion deletion multiplexing. PLoS One 2012; 7: E29684
34. Parra EJ, Marcini A, Akey J et al: Estimating African American admixture proportions by use of population-specific alleles. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 1839-1851. (Pubitemid 30415746
35. Kosoy R, Nassir R, Tian C et al: Ancestry informative marker sets for determining continental origin and admixture proportions in common populations in America. Hum Mutat 2009; 30: 69-78
36. Tian C, Gregersen PK, Seldin MF: Accounting for ancestry: Population substructure and genome-wide association studies. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17: R143-R150
37. Manta FS, Pereira R, Caiafa A, Silva DA, Gusmäo L, Carvalho EF: Analysis of genetic ancestry in the admixed Brazilian population from Rio de Janeiro using 46 autosomal ancestry-informative indel markers. Ann Hum Biol 2013; 40: 94-98
38. Buhard O, Suraweera N, Lectard A, Duval A, Hamelin R: Quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats for high-level microsatellite instability analysis. Dis Markers 2004; 20: 251-257. (Pubitemid 40164097
39. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000; 155: 945-959. (Pubitemid 30397141
40. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 2003; 164: 1567-1587. (Pubitemid 37102217
41. Berg AO, Armstrong K, Botkin J et al: Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: Genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives. Genet Med 2009; 11: 35-41
42. Pena SD, Di Pietro G, Fuchshuber-Moraes M et al: The genomic ancestry of individuals from different geographical regions of Brazil is more uniform than expected. PLoS One 2011; 6: E17063. e Tecnológico