New method for predicting estrogen receptor status utilizing breast MRI texture kinetic analysis

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 9035, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Chaudhury, Baishali ^a   Hall, Lawrence O ^a   Goldgof, Dmitry B ^a   Gatenby, Robert A ^b   Gillies, Robert ^b   Drukteinis, Jennifer S ^b  

^a University of South Florida   (United States)

^b H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

DCE MRI; Estrogen receptor; Heterogeneity; Local binary pattern; Naive Bayes; Textural kinetic features

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CLASSIFIERS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; HEMODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STATISTICAL METHODS; TEXTURES; TUMORS;

DCE-MRI; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; HETEROGENEITY; KINETIC FEATURES; LOCAL BINARY PATTERNS; NAIVE BAYES;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84902106452     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.2043188     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Oliver A, et al., "A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images," Medical Image Analysis, 14, 87-110(2010).
2. Gal Y, et al., "New spatiotemporal features for improved discrimination of benign and malignant lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced- magnetic resonance imaging of the breast," Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography;35, 645-52(2011).
3. Karahaliou A, et al., "Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis," British Journal of Radiology. 83, 296-309(2010).
4. Milenkovíc J, et al., "Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions," Artificial Intelligence Med, (2013).
5. Agner,S. C et al., "Segmentation and classification of triple negative breast cancers using DCE-MRI," Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI'09. IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 1227-1230(2009).
6. Agner,S et al., "Distinguishing molecular subtypes of breast cancer based on computer-aided diagnosis of dce-mri," International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting, 2490(2010).
7. Berry, D. A., "Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast Cancer," JAMA: The journal of the American Medical Association, 295(14), 1658-1667(2006).
8. Goldhirsch, A. S. C, "Endocrine responsiveness and tailoring adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal lymph nodenegative breast cancer: a randomized trial," Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(14),(2002).
9. Otsu N., "A threshold selection method from gray-level histogram," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 9:62-66(1979).
10. Uppuluri. A., "http://www. mathworks. com/matlabcentral/ fileexchange/22187-glcm-texture-features," [Online] (2008).
11. Ahonen, T., Matas, J., He, C., and Pietikäinen, M., " Rotation invariant image description with local binary pattern histogram fourier features," Image Analysis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 61-70(2009).
12. Wei X., "Gray Level Run Length Matrix Toolbox v1. 0," Software,Beijing Aeronautical Technology Research Center, (2007).
13. Nagarajan,M. B. et al., "Classification of Small Lesions in Breast MRI: Evaluating The Role of Dynamically Extracted Texture Features Through Feature Selection,"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 33(1), 59-68(2013).
14. Hall M A., "Correlation-based Feature Subset Selection for Machine Learning," Hamilton, New Zealand, (1998).
15. Kononenko I., "Estimating Attributes: Analysis and Extensions of RELIEF," In: European Conference on Machine Learning, 171-182(1994).
16. Kohavi R. and John G. H.,"Wrappers for feature subset selection," Artificial Intelligence, 97(1-2), 273-324(1997).
17. John,G. H. and Langley,P., "Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers," In: Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, San Mateo, 338-345 (1995).