Ethnic ingroup friendships in schools: Testing the by-product hypothesis in England, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden

Social Networks

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 33-45

  Smith, Sanne ^a,b   Maas, Ineke ^a,c   van Tubergen, Frank ^a,b,d  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Ethnicity; Europe; Friendship network

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901982570     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Algan Y., Dustmann C., Glitz A., Manning A. The economic situation of first and second-generation immigrants in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Econ. J. 2010, 120(542):F4-F30.
2. Baerveldt C., Van Duijn M.A.J., Vermeij L., Van Hemert D.A. Ethnic boundaries and personal choice. Assessing the influence of individual inclinations to choose intra-ethnic relationships on pupils' networks. Soc. Netw. 2004, 26(1):55-74.
3. Baerveldt C., Zijlstra B., de Wolf M., Van Rossem R., Van Duijn M.A.J. Ethnic boundaries in high school students' networks in Flanders and the Netherlands. Int. Soc. 2007, 22(6):701-720.
4. Best H., Wolf C. Modellvergleich und ergebnisinterpretation in logit- und probit-regressionen. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie 2012, 64(2):377-395.
5. Blau P. Inequality and Heterogeneity. A Primitive Theory of Social Structure 1977, Free Press, New York.
6. Brashears M.E. Gender and homophily: differences in male and female association in Blau space. Soc. Sci. Res. 2008, 37(2):400-415.
7. Brown B.B., Herman M., Hamm J.V., Heck D.J. Ethnicity and image: correlates of crowd affiliation among ethnic minority youth. Child Dev. 2008, 79(3):529-546.
8. Busser J.A., Hyams A.L., Carruthers C.P. Differences in adolescent activity participation by gender, grade and ethnicity. J. Park Recreat. Admin. 1996, 14(4):1-20.
9. Byrne D.E. The Attraction Paradigm 1971, Academic Press, New York.
10. Castles S., Miller M.J. The Age of Migration 2003, The Guilford Press, New York. 3rd ed.
11. Currarini S., Jackson M.O., Pin P. Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107(11):4857-4861.
12. Eshel Y., Kurman J. Ethnic equity and asymmetry in peer acceptance. J. Soc. Psychol. 1990, 130(6):713-723.
13. Ganzeboom H.B.G., De Graaf P.M., Treiman D.J. A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Soc. Sci. Res. 1992, 21(1):1-56.
14. Goodreau S.M., Kitts J.A., Morris M. Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using Exponential Random Graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography 2009, 46(1):103-125.
15. Hamm J.V., Brown B.B., Heck D.J. Bridging the ethnic divide: student and school characteristics in African American, Asian-descent, Latino, and White adolescents' cross-ethnic friend nominations. J. Res. Adoles. (Blackwell Publishing Limited) 2005, 15(1):21-46.
16. Huisman M. Imputation of missing network data: some simple procedures. J. Soc. Struct. 2009, 10(1):1-29.
17. Ibarra H. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: a conceptual framework. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1993, 18(1):56-87.
18. Ingram P., Morris M.W. Do people mix at mixers? Structure, homophily, and the "life of the party". Adm. Sci. Q. 2007, 52(4):558-585.
19. Kalter F., Heath A.F., Hewstone M., Jonsson J.O., Kalmijn M., Kogan I., Van Tubergen F. Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Survey in Four European Countries (CILS4EU), GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, ZA5353 Data file Version 1.0.0 2013.
20. Kandel D.B. Status homophily, social context, and participation in psychotherapy. Am. J. Sociol. 1966, 71(6):640-650.
21. Kelley J., Graaf N.D.D. National context, parental socialization, and religious belief: results from 15 nations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1997, 62(4):639-659.
22. Kelly J.R., Godbey G. The Sociology of Leisure 1992, Venture Pub, State College, PA.
23. Kerckhoff A.C., Davis K.E. Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1962, 27(3):295-303.
24. Knecht A., Snijders T.A.B., Baerveldt C., Steglich C.E.G., Raub W. Friendship and delinquency: selection and influence processes in early adolescence. Soc. Dev. 2010, 19(3):494-514.
25. Kohler U., Karlson K.B., Holm A. Comparing coefficients of nested nonlinear probability models. Stata J. 2011, 11(3):420-438.
26. Lubbers M.J. Group composition and network structure in school classes: a multilevel application of the p* model. Soc. Netw. 2003, 25(4):309-332.
27. Lubbers M.J., Snijders T.A.B., Van Der Werf M.P.C. Dynamics of peer relationships across the first two years of junior high as a function of gender and changes in classroom composition. J. Res. Adoles. 2010, 21(2):488-504.
28. Lusher D., Koskinen J., Robins G. Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods and Applications 2013, Cambridge University Press, New York.
29. Marmaros D., Sacerdote B. How do friendships form?. Quart. J. Econ. 2006, 121(1):79-119.
30. Mayer A., Puller S.L. The old boy (and girl) network: social network formation on university campuses. J. Publ. Econ. 2008, 92(1-2):329-347.
31. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J.M. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Soc. 2001, 27:415-444.
32. Mood C. Logistic regression: why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 2010, 26(1):67-82.
33. Mouw T., Entwisle B. Residential segregation and interracial friendship in schools. Am. J. Sociol. 2006, 112(2):394-441.
34. Munniksma A., Flache A., Verkuyten M., Veenstra R. Parental acceptance of children's intimate ethnic outgroup relations: the role of culture, status, and family reputation. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2012, 36(4):575-585.
35. Murstein B.I. Stimulus. Value. Role: a theory of marital choice. J. Marriage Fam. 1970, 32(3):465-481.
36. Rystad G. Immigration history and the future of international migration. Int. Migrat. Rev. 1992, 26(4):1168-1199.
37. Schnepf S.V. Immigrants' educational disadvantage: an examination across ten countries and three surveys. J. Popul. Econ. 2007, (3):527-545.
38. Shah K. Attitudes of Pakistani students toward family life. Marriage Fam. Liv. 1960, 22(2):156-161.
39. Shrum W., Cheek N.H., Hunter S.M. Friendship in school: gender and racial homophily. Soc. Educ. 1988, 61(4):227-239.
40. Stark T.H., Flache A. The double edge of common interest. Soc. Educ. 2012, 85(2):179-199.
41. Stodolska M., Yi J. Impact of immigration on ethnic identity and leisure behavior on adolescent immigrants from Korea, Mexico and Poland. J. Leis. Res. 2003, 35(1):49.
42. Tolsma J., Van Deurzen I., Stark T.H., Veenstra R. Who is bullying whom in ethnically diverse primary schools? Exploring links between bullying, ethnicity, and ethnic diversity in Dutch primary schools. Soc. Netw. 2013, 35(1):51-61.
43. Tonry M. Ethnicity, crime and immigration. Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration: Comparative and Cross-national Perspectives. Crime and Justice. A Review of Research 1993, 1-30. University of Chicago pres, Chicago. M. Tonry (Ed.).
44. Urberg K.A., Degirmencioglu S.M., Tolson J.M. Adolescent friendship selection and termination: the role of similarity. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 1998, 15(5):703-710.
45. Uunk W. The cultural integration of immigrants in the Netherlands: a description and explanation of modern attitudes of Turks, Moroccans, Surinamese, Antilleans, and the indigenous population. Integrating Immigrants in the Netherlands: Cultural Versus Socio-economic Integration (Research in Migration and Ethnic Relations) 2003, 199-227. Ashgate, Aldershot. Aldershot ed. L. Hagendoorn, J. Veenman, W. Vollebergh (Eds.).
46. Van Amersfoort H., Van Niekerk M. Immigration as a colonial inheritance: post-colonial immigrants in the Netherlands, 1945-2002. J. Ethnic Migrat. Stud. 2006, 32(3):323-346.
47. 2: a random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Stat. Neerland. 2004, 58(2):234-254.
48. Van Tubergen F., Poortman A. Adolescent Alcohol Use in the Netherlands: The Role of Ethnicity, Ethnic Intermarriage, and Ethnic School Composition. Ethn. Health 2010, 15(1):1-13.
49. Verbrugge L.M. The structure of adult friendship choices. Soc. Forces 1977, 56(2, Special Issue):576-597.
50. Vermeij L., Van Duijn M.A.J., Baerveldt C. Ethnic segregation in context: social discrimination among native Dutch pupils and their ethnic minority classmates. Soc. Netw. 2009, 31(4):230-239.
51. Vries H., Candel M.d., Engels R., Mercken L. Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12-13 year olds from six European countries from the European smoking prevention framework approach study. Tob. Control 2006, 15(2):83-89.
52. Williams J.H., Ayers C.D., Abbott R.D., Hawkins J.D., Catalano R.F. Racial differences in risk factors for delinquency and substance use among adolescents. Soc. Work Res. 1999, 23(4):241-256.
53. Wimmer A., Lewis K. Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. Am. J. Sociol. 2010, 116(2):583-642.
54. Windzio M. Integration of immigrant children into inter-ethnic friendship networks: the role of 'Intergenerational openness'. Sociology 2012, 46(2):258-271.
55. Windzio M., Bicer E. Are we just friends? Immigrant integration into high- and low-cost social networks. Ration. Soc. 2013, 25(2):123-145.
56. Winship C., Mare R.D. Regression models with ordinal variables. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1984, 49(4):512-525.
57. Zeng Z., Xie Y. A preference-opportunity-choice framework with applications to intergroup friendship. Am. J. Sociol. 2008, 114(3):615-648.
58. 2 model: a random effects model for the analysis of multiple social networks. Methodol.: Eur. J. Res. Methods Behav. Soc. Sci. 2006, 2(1):42-47.