Towards Post-neoliberal Resource Politics? The International Political Economy (IPE) of Oil and Copper in Brazil and Chile

New Political Economy

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 329-358

  Nem Singh, Jewellord Tolentino ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brazil; Chile; critical IPE; historical institutionalism; incremental change; post neoliberalism; resource politics; state strategies

Indexed keywords

COMMODITY MARKET; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; NEOLIBERALISM; POLITICAL ECONOMY; POLITICS; STATE ROLE;

BRAZIL; CHILE;

EID: 84901685268     PISSN: 13563467     EISSN: 14699923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2013.779649     Document Type: Article

References (154)

1. Abidin, M.Z. (2001), 'Competitive Industrialisation with Natural Resource Abundance: Malaysia', in R. Auty (ed.), Resource Abundance and Economic Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 147-64.
2. Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis (ANP) (2011), ANP Annual Report 2010 (Rio de Janeiro: ANP Publications).
3. Aguiar de Medeiros, C. (2009), 'Asset-Stripping the State: The Political Economy of Privatization in Latin America', New Left Review, 55, (January-February), 109-32
4. Aharoni, Y. and Ascher, W. (1998), 'Restructuring the Arrangements between Government and State Enterprises in the Oil and Mining Sectors', Natural Resources Forum, 22 (3), pp. 201-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.1998.tb00729.x
5. Alexander, W.L. (ed.) (2009), Lost in the Long Transition: Struggles for Social Justice in Neoliberal Chile (Plymouth: Lexington Books).
6. Arbix, G. and Scott, M. (2010), 'Beyond Developmentalism and Market Fundamentalism in Brazil: Inclusionary State Activism without Statism', paper presented at the workshop 'States, Development and Global Governance', University of Wisconsin-Madison, 12-13 March
7. Aroca, P. (2001), 'Impacts and Development in Local Economies based on Mining: The Case of Chilean II Region', Resources Policy, 27 (2), pp. 119-34. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4207(01)00013-7
8. Artestis, P. and Saad Filho, A. (eds) (2007), Political Economy of Brazil: Recent Economic Performance (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
9. Auty, R.M. (1993), Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis (London: Routledge).
10. Auty, R.M. (ed.) (2001), Resource Abundance and Economic Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
11. Barbier, E. (2003), 'The Role of Natural Resources in Economic Development', Australian Economic Papers, 42 (2), pp. 253-72.
12. Barbier, E. (2005), Natural Resources and Economic Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
13. Barbier, E. (2011), Scarcity and Frontiers: How Economies Have Developed through Natural Resource Exploitation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
14. Barton, J. (2002), 'State Continuismo and Pinochetismo: The Keys to the Chilean Transition', Bulletin of Latin American Research, 21 (3), pp. 358-74. doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00048
15. Barton, J. and Warwick, M. (2002), 'The End of Transition? Chile 1990-2000', Bulletin of Latin American Research, 21 (3), pp. 329-38. doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00046
16. BBC (2012), 'Argentina Senate Backs YPF Oil Nationalisation', Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17850544 [accessed 24 January 2013]
17. Bebbington, A. (ed.) (2012), Social Conflict, Economic Development, and the Extractive Industry: Evidence from South America (London: Routledge).
18. Bebbington, A.et al. (2008), 'Contention and Ambiguity: Mining and the Possibilities of Development', Development and Change, 39 (6), pp. 887-914. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00517.x
19. Bergquist, C. (1986), Labour in Latin America. Comparative Essays on Chile, Argentina, Venezuela, and Colombia (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
20. Berrios, R., Marak, A. and Morgensten, S. (2011), 'Explaining Hydrocarbon Nationalization in Latin America: Economics and Political Ideology', Review of International Political Economy, 18 (5), pp. 673-97. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2010.493733
21. Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
22. Borzutzky, S. and Weeks, G. (eds) (2010), The Bachelet Government: Conflict and Consensus in Post-Pinochet Chile (Florida: University Press of Florida).
23. Brainard, L. and Martínez-Diaz, L. (eds) (2009), Brazil as an Emerging Economic Superpower? (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).
24. Brautigam, D. (2009), The Dragon's Gift: The Real Story of China in Africa (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
25. Bronstein, H. (2012), 'Argentina Nationalises Oil Company YPF', Reuters, Available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/04/us-argentina-ypf-idUSBRE8421GV20120504 [accessed 24 January 2013]
26. Brooks, S. (2009), Social Protection and the Market in Latin America. The Transformation of Social Security Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
27. Bunker, S.G. (1985), Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange and the Failure of the Modern State (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).
28. Bunker, S.G. and Ciccantell, P.S. (2005), Globalization and the Race for Resources (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
29. Burges, S. (2009), 'Brazil: Toward a (Neo)Liberal Democracy?', in J. Grugel and P. Riggirozzi (eds), Governance after Neoliberalism in Latin America (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) pp. 195-216.
30. Cameron, M. and Hershberg, E. (eds) (2011), Latin America's Left Turns: Politics, Policies, and Trajectories of Change (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers).
31. Campbell, B. (ed.) (2009), Mining in Africa: Regulation and Development (London: Pluto Press).
32. Campbell, J.L. (2001), 'Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy', in J.L. Campbell, O.K. Pedersen (eds), The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press) pp. 159-90.
33. Cardoso, F.H. (1973), 'Associated-Dependent Development: Theoretical and Practical Implications', in A. Stepan (ed.), Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, Future (New Haven and London: Yale University Press). pp. 142-78.
34. Cardoso, F.H. and Faletto, E. (1979), Dependency and Development in Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press).
35. Castañeda, J. and Morales, M. (2008), Leftovers: Tales of the Two Latin American Lefts (London: Routledge).
36. Castillo-Ospina, O.L. (forthcoming), 'Sustainable versus Development? Mining and Natural Resources Governance in Colombia', in J. Nem Singh and F. Bourgouin (eds), Resource Governance and Developmental States in the Global South: Critical International Political Economy Perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
37. Chang, H.J. (2007), State-owned Enterprise Reform. UNDESA National Development Strategies Policy Notes (New York: UN Publications).
38. CODELCO (2010), CODELCO Annual Report (2010) (Santiago de Chile: CODELCO).
39. CODELCO (2012), Plan de Inversiones CODELCO 2012, March. Available from: http://www.codelco.cl/prontus_codelco/site/artic/20120306/asocfile/20120306130444/plan_de_inversiones_codelco_2012_0503(2012),pdf [accessed 3 April 2012]
40. Collier, R.B. and Collier, D. (2002), Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labour Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
41. Comisión Chilena del Cobre (COCHILCO) (2009), COCHILCO Annuario (Santiago de Chile: COCHILCO Publications).
42. Comisión Chilena del Cobre (COCHILCO) (2010), COCHILCO Annuario (Santiago de Chile: COCHILCO Publications).
43. Di John, J. (2009), From Windfall to Curse? Oil and Industrialisation in Venezuela, 1920-Present (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).
44. Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (2003), 'Tropics, Germs and Crops: How Endowments Influence Economic Development', Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, pp. 3-39.
45. Edwards, S. (2010), Left Behind: Latin America and the False Promise of Populism (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
46. Evans, P. (1979), Dependent Development: Alliance of the Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
47. Evans, P. (1995), Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
48. Farrell, H. and Newman, A. (2010), 'Making Global Markets: Historical Institutionalism in International Political Economy', Review of International Political Economy, 17 (4), pp. 609-38. doi: 10.1080/09692291003723672
49. Fleury, A. and Leme Fleury, M.T. (2011), Brazilian Multinationals: Competences for Internationalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
50. Gallagher, K. and Porzecanski, R. (2010), The Dragon in the Room: China and the Future of Latin American Industrialisation (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
51. Garnaut, R. (2012), 'The Contemporary China Resources Boom', Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 56, pp. 222-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00581.x
52. Gellert, P.K. (2010a), 'Rival Transnational Networks, Domestic Politics, and Indonesian Timber', Journal of Contemporary Asia, 40 (4), pp. 539-67. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2010.507041
53. Gellert, P.K. (2010b), 'Extractive Regimes: Toward a Better Understanding of Indonesian Development', Rural Sociology, 75 (1), pp. 28-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00001.x
54. Gofas, A. and Hay, C. (2010), The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis: A Portrait of Contemporary Debates, in A. Gofas and C. Hay (eds), (London: Routledge).
55. Goldstein, A. (1999), 'Brazilian Privatization in International Perspective: The Rocky Path from State Capitalism to Regulatory Capitalism', Industrial and Corporate Change, 8 (4), pp. 673-711. doi: 10.1093/icc/8.4.673
56. Goldstein, A. (2006), 'State-owned Enterprises, Privatization and Industrial Policy', in P. Bianchi and S. Labory (eds), International Handbook on Industrial Policy (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar) pp. 198-214.
57. Goldstein, A. (2007), Multinational Companies from Emerging Economies. Composition, Conceptualisation, and Direction in the Global Economy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
58. González, F. (2008), Dual Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Institutionalised Regimes in Chile and Mexico, 1970-2000 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
59. Grugel, J. and Riggirozzi, P. (2007), 'The Return of the State in Argentina', International Affairs, 83 (1), pp. 87-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00604.x
60. Grugel, J. and Riggirozzi, P. (eds) (2009), Governance after Neoliberalism in Latin America (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
61. Grugel, J. and Riggirozzi, P. (2012), 'Post Neoliberalism: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State in Latin America', Development and Change, 43 (1), pp. 1-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01746.x
62. Haarstad, H. (ed.) (2012), New Political Spaces in Latin American Natural Resource Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
63. Haggard, S. (1990), Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
64. Hall, P.A. (1989), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
65. Hall, P.A. (1993), 'Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain', Comparative Politics, 25 (3), pp. 275-96. doi: 10.2307/422246
66. Hay, C. (2004), 'The Normalizing Role of Rationalist Assumptions in the Institutional Embedding of Neoliberalism', Economy and Society, 33 (4), pp. 500-27. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000285260
67. Hay, C. (2011), 'Ideas and the Construction of Interests', in D. Béland, R.H. Cox (eds), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
68. Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (1998), 'Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism', Political Studies, 46, pp. 951-7. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00177
69. Hertog, S. (2010a), 'Defying the Resource Curse. Explaining Successful State-Owned Enterprises in Rentier States', World Politics, 62 (2), pp. 261-301. doi: 10.1017/S0043887110000055
70. Hertog, S. (2010b), Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats. Oil and the State in Saudi Arabia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
71. Hogenboom, B. (2012), 'The Return of the State and New Extractivism: What about Civil Society?', in B. Cannon and P. Kirby (eds), Civil Society and the State in Left-led Latin America. Challenges and Limits to Democratization (London: Zed Publications).
72. Hujo, K. (2012), Mining Rents and the Financing of Social Policy: Opportunities and Challenges, in K. Hujo (eds), (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
73. Hujo, K. and McClanahan, S. (2009), Financing Social Policy: Mobilising Resources for Social Development, in K. Hujo and S. McClanahan (eds), (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
74. Humphreys, M., Sachs, J. and Stiglitz, J.E. (2007), Escaping the Resource Curse (New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press).
75. Hunter, W. (2007), 'The Normalization of an Anomaly: The Workers' Party in Brazil', World Politics, 59 (3), pp. 440-75. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100020888
76. Hunter, W. (2010), The Transformation of the Workers' Party, 1989-2009 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
77. Hunter, W. (2011), 'Brazil: The PT in Power', in S. Levitsky and K. Roberts (eds), The Resurgence of the Latin American Left (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press). pp. 306-24.
78. Hunter, W. and Borges Sugiyama, N. (2009), 'Democracy and Social Policy in Brazil: Advancing Basic Needs, Preserving Privileged Interests', Latin American Politics and Society, 51 (2), pp. 29-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2009.00047.x
79. Hunter, W. and Power, T. (2007), 'Rewarding Lula: Executive Power, Social Policy and the Brazilian Elections of 2006', Latin American Politics and Society, 49 (1), pp. 1- 30. doi: 10.1353/lap.2007.0005
80. Jenkins, R. (2012), 'Latin America and China: A New Dependency?', Third World Quarterly, 33 (7), pp. 1337-58. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2012.691834
81. Karl, T.L. (1997), The Paradox of the Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States (Berkeley: University of California Press).
82. Kaup, B. (2010), 'A Neoliberal Nationalization: The Constraints on Natural Gas-Led Development in Bolivia', Latin American Perspectives, 37 (3), pp. 123-38. doi: 10.1177/0094582X10366534
83. Kingstone, P. (1999), Crafting Coalitions for Reform: Business Preferences, Political Institutions and Neoliberalism in Brazil (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).
84. Kohli, A. (2004), State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
85. Kurtz, M.J. (2009), 'The Social Foundations of Institutional Order: Reconsidering War and the "Resource Curse" in Third World State-Building', Politics and Society, 37 (4), pp. 479-520. doi: 10.1177/0032329209349223
86. Levitsky, S. and Roberts, K. (2011), The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, in S. Levitsky and K. Roberts (eds), (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
87. Lievesley, G. and Ludlam, S. (2009), Reclaiming Latin America: Experiments in Radical Social Democracy, in G. Lievesley and S. Ludlam (eds), (London: Zed Publications).
88. Lima, P.C.R. (2010), 'Descrição e Análise de Contrato de Cessão Onerosa entre a União e a Petrobrás', Nota Téchnica (Brasilia, DF: Câmara dos Deputados, Consultoria Legislativa).
89. Love, J. and Baer, W. (2009), Brazil under Lula: Economy, Politics and Society under the Worker-President, in J. Love and W. Baer (eds), (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
90. Mahoney, J. (2000), 'Path Dependence in Historical Sociology', Theory and Society, 29 (4), pp. 507-48. doi: 10.1023/A:1007113830879
91. Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2010), Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, in J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
92. Maia, J., Mondi, L. and Roberts, S. (2005), 'Industrial Development and Industrial Finance in Brazil and South Africa', Annual Forum 2005. Trade and Uneven Development: Opportunities and Challenges, University of Capetown and UNU-Wider. Available from http://www.tips.org.za/files/789.pdf
93. Melo, M.A. (2008), 'Unexpected Successes, Unanticipated Failures: Social Policy from Cardoso to Lula', in P.R. Kingstone and T. Power (eds), Democratic Brazil Revisited (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press), pp. 161-84.
94. Montero, A. (1998), 'State Interests and New Industrial Policy in Brazil: The Case of the Privatization of Steel, 1990-1994', Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 40 (3), pp. 27-62. doi: 10.2307/166199
95. Naím, M. (1994), 'Latin America: The Second Stage of Reform', Journal of Democracy, 5 (4), pp. 32-48. doi: 10.1353/jod.1994.0057
96. Nem Singh, J.T. (2010), 'Reconstituting the Neostructuralist State: Political Economy of Continuity and Change in Chilean Mining Policy', Third World Quarterly, 31 (8), pp. 1413-33. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.538240
97. Nem Singh, J.T. (2012), States, Markets and Labour Unions: The Political Economy of Oil and Copper in Brazil and Chile, PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield
98. Nem Singh, J.T. and Bourgouin, F. (forthcoming), 'Introduction', in J.T. Nem Singh and F. Bourgouin (eds), Resource Governance and Developmental States: Critical International Political Economy Perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
99. North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
100. OECD (2011), Corporate Governance: Corporate Governance in Chile (Paris: OECD Publishing).
101. Panizza, F. (2009), Contemporary Latin America: Development and Democracy beyond the Washington Consensus (London: Zed Publications).
102. Pardelli, G. (2010), 'Appendix 1: The Growth Acceleration Programme (PAC)', Morgan Stanley Research 'Brazil Infrastructure: Paving the Way'. Available from: http://www.morganstanley.com/views/perspectives/pavingtheway.pdf [accessed 15 July 2012]
103. Pedersen, J.D. (2008), Globalisation, Development and the State. The Performance of Brazil and India since 1990 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
104. Petras, J. and Veltmeyer, H. (2009), What's Left in Latin America? Regime Change in New Times (Surrey: Ashgate Publishing).
105. PETROBRAS (2011), PETROBRAS Annual Report (Rio de Janeiro: PETROBRAS).
106. Philip, G. (1982), Oil and Politics in Latin America: Nationalist Movements and State Companies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
107. Pierson, P. (2000), 'Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics', American Political Science Review, 94 (2), pp. 251-67. doi: 10.2307/2586011
108. Pierson, P. (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press).
109. Pinheiro, A.C., Bonelli, R. and Schneider, B.R. (2004), Pragmatic Policy in Brazil: The Political Economy of Incomplete Market Reform, Texto para Discussão No. 1035 (Rio de Janeiro: IPEA).
110. Pollack, B. and Grugel, J. (1984), 'Chile Before and After Monetarism', Bulletin of Latin American Research, 3 (2), pp. 131-43.
111. Power, T. (2010), 'Optimism, Pessimism, and Coalitional Presidentialism: Debating the Institutional Design of Brazilian Democracy', Bulletin of Latin American Research, 29 (1), pp. 18-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2009.00304.x
112. Prebisch, R. (1950), 'The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems', Economic Bulletin for Latin America, report E/CN.12/89/Rev (New York: United Nations)
113. Randall, L. (1992), 'The Role of Oil in Brazil's Economic Options', paper presented at the annual meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Los Angeles, 24-27 September
114. Randall, L. (1993), The Political Economy of Brazilian Oil (Westport: Praeger Publishers).
115. Raw, S. (1987), 'The Making of a State-Owned Conglomerate: A Brazilian Case Study', Working Paper No. 97, Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, August. Available from: http://kellogg.nd.edu/publications/workingpapers/WPS/097.pdf [accessed 15 July 2011]
116. Resende, P. (2009), 'Chapter 2.1. Infrastructure: Will PAC Really Accelerate Growth?', in I. Miaet al. (eds), Brazil Competitiveness Report 2009 (Geneva: World Economic Forum). pp. 31-9.
117. Ross, M. (1999), 'The Political Economy of the Resource Curse', World Politics, 51 (2), pp. 297-322. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008200
118. Ross, M. (2001), Extractive Sector and the Poor. An Oxfam Report (Washington, DC: Oxfam America).
119. Ross, M. (2012), The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
120. Rosser, A. (2006), The Political Economy of the Resource Curse: A Literature Survey, IDS Working Paper 268 (Sussex: Institute of Development Studies).
121. Rosser, A. (2007), 'Escaping the Resource Curse? The Case of Indonesia', Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37 (1), pp. 38-58. doi: 10.1080/00472330601104557
122. Sachs, J. and Warner, A. (1995), 'Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth', Working Paper No. 5398, National Bureau of Economic Research
123. Sachs, J. and Warner, A. (1997), Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth, Center for International Development and Harvard Institute for International Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University)
124. Sader, E. (2011), The New Mole: Paths of the Latin American Left (London: Verso).
125. Schamis, H. (1999), 'Distributional Coalitions and the Politics of Economic Reform in Latin America', World Politics, 51 (2), pp. 236-68. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008182
126. Schneider, B.R. (2004), 'Organizing Interests and Coalitions in the Politics of Market Reform in Latin America', World Politics, 56 (3), pp. 456-79. doi: 10.1353/wp.2004.0019
127. Schneider, B.R. (2009), 'Big Business in Brazil: Leveraging Natural Endowments and State Support for International Expansion', in L. Brainard and L. Martínez-Diaz (eds), Brazil as an Emerging Economic Superpower? (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution). pp. 159-86.
128. SECOM (2010), 'Brazil Announces Phase 2 of the Growth Acceleration Programme', 30 March. Available from: http://blogs.worldbank.org/growth/brazil-announces-phase-two-growth-acceleration-program#secom [accessed 15 July 2012]
129. Shirley, M.M. (1999), 'Bureaucrats in Business: The Role of Privatization versus Corporatization in State-Owned Enterprise Reform', World Development, 27 (1), pp. 115-36. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00130-2
130. Sikor, T. and Lund, C. (eds) (2009), The Politics of Possession: Property, Authority and Access to Natural Resources (London: Wiley-Blackwell).
131. Silva, E. (2009), Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
132. Silva, P. (2004), 'Doing Politics in a Depoliticized Society: Social Change and Political Deactivation in Chile', Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23 (1), pp. 63-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00096.x
133. Silva, P. (2009), In the Name of Reason: Technocrats and Politics in Chile (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).
134. Singh, J.T. and Massi, E. (forthcoming), 'Rethinking Neoliberalism in Brazil: The Political Economy of Reforms in Mining and Oil', Politics and Society, special issue on 'Post-neoliberalism in the Southern Cone', under review.
135. Smith, P.S. (1976), Oil and Politics in Modern Brazil (Toronto: Macmillan).
136. Solimano, A. (2012), Chile and the Neoliberal Trap. The Post-Pinochet Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
137. Staab, S. (2010), 'Social Investment Policies in Chile and Latin America: Towards Equal Opportunities for Women and Children?', Journal of Social Policy, 39 (4), pp. 607-26. doi: 10.1017/S0047279410000243
138. Staab, S. (2012), 'Maternalism, Male-Breadwinner Bias, and Market Reform: Historical Legacies and Current Reforms in Chilean Social Policy', Social Politics, 19 (3), pp. 299-332. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxs010
139. Taylor, M. (2006), From Pinochet to the 'Third Way': Neoliberalism and Social Transformation in Chile (London and Ann Arbour: Pluto Press).
140. The Economist (2011), 'Latin America's Economies: The Balancing Act', The Economist, The Americas Section, 13 August.
141. Thelen, K. (1999), 'Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics', Annual Review of Political Science, 2, pp. 369-404. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
142. Thelen, K. (2003), 'How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis', in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 305-36.
143. Thorpe, R.et al. (2012), The Developmental Challenges of Mining and Oil. Lessons from Africa and Latin America (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
144. Trebat, T.J. (1983), Brazil's State-Owned Enterprises: A Case Study of the State as Entrepreneur (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
145. Ubiraci Sennes, R. and Narciso, T. (2009), 'Brazil as an International Energy Player', in L. Brainard and L. Martínez-Diaz (eds), Brazil as an Emerging Economic Superpower? (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution). pp. 17-54.
146. Vergara, A. (2008), Copper Workers, International Business and Domestic Politics in Cold War Chile (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).
147. Victor, D.G., Hults, D. and Thurber, M. (eds) (2011), Oil and Governance: State-Owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
148. Villarzú, J.R. (2005), 'CODELCO y el Modelo de Alianza Estratégica', PowerPoint presentation, 21 October
149. Waterbury, J. (1993), Exposed to Innumerable Delusions: Public Enterprise and State Power in Egypt, India, Mexico, and Turkey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
150. Weyland, K. (2008), 'Toward a New Theory of Institutional Change', World Politics, 60 (2), pp. 281-314. doi: 10.1353/wp.0.0013
151. Weyland, K., Madrid, R. and Hunter, W. (eds) (2010), Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
152. Wirth, J. (1970), The Politics of Brazilian Development, 1930-1954 (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
153. Wise, C. and Roett, R. (eds) (2000), Exchange Rate Politics in Latin America (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).
154. World Bank (1995), Restructuring the Public Mining Institutions of the Latin America and Caribbean Region (Washington, DC: World Bank).