A new era in mammography screening

Radiology

Volumn 271, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 629-631

  Kopans, Daniel B ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DEVICE APPROVAL; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; EDITORIAL; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RISK REDUCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDIZATION; TWO DIMENSIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY; XEROMAMMOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84901674331     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140177     Document Type: Editorial

References (31)

1. Gøtzsche PC. Time to stop mammography screening? CMAJ 2011;183(17):1957-1958.
2. Kopans DB. The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are not supported by science: the scientifc support for mammography screening. Radiol Clin North Am 2010; 48(5):843-857.
3. Qaseem A, Snow V, Sherif K, et al. Screening mammography for women 40 to 49 years of age: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2007;146(7):511-515
4. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(10):716-726, W-236.
5. Egan RL. Experience with mammography in a tumor institution: evaluation of 1, 000 studies. Radiology 1960;75:894-900.
6. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L. Periodic screening for breast cancer: the Health Insurance Plan Project and its sequelae, 1963-1986. Baltimore, Md: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.
7. Bailar JC 3rd. Mammography: a contrary view. Ann Intern Med 1976;84(1):77-84.
8. Mettler FA, Upton AC, Kelsey CA, Ashby RN, Rosenberg RD, Linver MN. Benefts versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment. Cancer 1996;77(5):903-909.
9. Tabár L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985;1(8433):829-832.
10. Kopans DB. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2002;94(2):580-581; author reply 581-583.
11. Kopans DB. Just the facts: mammography saves lives with little if any radiation risk to the mature breast. Health Phys 2011;101(5):578-582.
12. Chang CHJ, Nesbit DE, Fisher DR, et al. Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;138(3):553-558.
13. Miller ER, McCurry EM, Hruska B. An infnite number of laminagrams from a f-nite number of radiographs. Radiology 1971;98(2):249-255.
14. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997;205(2):399-406.
15. Niklason LT, Niklason LE, Kopans DB, inventors; The General Hospital Corporation, assignee. Tomosynthesis system for breast imaging. US patent 5 872 828. February 16, 1999.
16. Rafferty EA, Georgian-Smith D, Kopans DB, Hall DA, Moore R, Wu T. Comparison of full-feld digital tomosynthesis with two view conventional flm screen mammogra-phy in the prediction of lesion malignancy [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientifc Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2003.
17. Rafferty EA, Georgian-Smith D, Kopans DB, Wu T, Moore R. Eliminating the fake out: comparison of full-feld digital tomosyn-thesis in distinguishing mammographic abnormalities from superimposition of normal breast structures [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientifc Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2003.
18. Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, et al. Detection and classifcation of calcifca-tions on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. [Published correction appears in AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(3):743]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(2):320-324.
19. Kopans DB. Digital breast tomosynthesis. In: Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, 2007; 1065-1081.
20. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roent-genol 2007;189(3):616-623.
21. Kopans D, Gavenonis S, Halpern E, Moore R. Calcifcations in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast J 2011;17(6):638-644.
22. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013;267(1):47-56.
23. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(7):583-589.
24. Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, et al. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. Br J Radiol 2012; 85(1020):e1174-e1178.
25. Noroozian M, Hadjiiski L, Rahnama-Mogh-adam S, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization. Radiology 2012; 262(1):61-68.
26. Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Ganott MA, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcifed breast lesions. Radiology 2013;266(1):89-95.
27. Waldherr C, Cerny P, Altermatt HJ, et al. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(1): 226-231.
28. Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J, Raghu M, Du-rand M, Philpotts LE. Comparison of tomo-synthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology 2013;269(3):694-700.
29. Zuley ML, Guo B, Catullo VJ, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mam-mograms alone and in combination with to-mosynthesis images. Radiology 2014;271(3): 664-671.
30. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB, et al. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast to-mosynthesis with full-feld digital mammo-graphic images. Radiology 2014;271(3): 655-663.
31. Fang Q, Selb J, Carp SA, et al. Combined optical and X-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging. Radiology 2011;258(1):89-97.