Combined optical and x-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging

Radiology

Volumn 258, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 89-97

  Fang, Qianqian ^a   Selb, Juliette ^a   Carp, Stefan A ^a   Boverman, Gregory ^c   Miller, Eric L ^b   Brooks, Dana H ^c   Moore, Richard H ^a   Kopans, Daniel B ^a   Boas, David A ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Tufts University   (United States)

^c Northeastern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; OPTICS; OXYGEN SATURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; THORAX WALL; X RAY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL;

EID: 78650619985     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10082176     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Morris EA. Breast cancer imaging with MRI. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;50(3):443-466.
2. Poplack SP, Wells WA, Paulsen KD. Four alternative imaging modalities. In: Paulsen KD, Meaney PM, Gilman LC, eds. Alternative breast imaging: four model-based approaches. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, 2005;5-25.
3. Görres GW, Steinert HC, von Schulthess GK. PET and functional anatomic fusion imaging in lung and breast cancers. Cancer J 2004;50(4):251-261.
4. James JJ. The current status of digital mammography. Clin Radiol 2004;59(1):1-10.
5. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;553(17):1773-1783.
6. Grant DG. Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional radiographic imaging technique. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1972;59(1):20-28.
7. Niklason L T, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997;505(2):399-406.
8. Wu T, Zhang J, Moore R, et al. Digital tomosynthesis mammography using a parallel maximum-likelihood reconstruction method. In: Yaffe MJ, Flynn MJ, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2004-physics of medical imaging. Vol 5368. Bellingham, Wash: The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2004;5-11.
9. Rafferty EA, Kopans DB, Wu T, Moore RH. Tomosynthesis: a new tool for breast cancer detection [abstr]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005;54(suppl):S2.
10. Feig SA, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;571(1):29-33.
11. Hebden JC, Arridge SR, Delpy DT. Optical imaging in medicine. I. Experimental techniques. Phys Med Biol 1997;52(5):825-840.
12. Tromberg BJ, Shah N, Lanning R, et al. Noninvasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy. Neoplasia 2000;5(1-2):26-40.
13. Boas DA, Brooks DH, Miller EL, et al. Imaging the body with diffuse optical tomography. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2001;58(6):57-75.
14. Durduran T, Choe R, Culver JP, et al. Bulk optical properties of healthy female breast tissue. Phys Med Biol 2002;57(16):2847-2861.
15. Poplack SP, Paulsen KD, Hartov A, et al. Electromagnetic breast imaging: average tissue property values in women with negative clinical findings. Radiology 2004;531(2):571-580.
16. Gibson AP, Hebden JC, Arridge SR. Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging. Phys Med Biol 2005;50(4):R1-R43.
17. Arridge SR, Hebden JC. Optical imaging in medicine. II. Modelling and reconstruction. Phys Med Biol 1997;52(5):841-853.
18. Peters VG, Wyman DR, Patterson MS, Frank GL. Optical properties of normal and diseased human breast tissues in the visible and near infrared. Phys Med Biol 1990;55(9):1317-1334.
19. Intes X, Djeziri S, Ichalalene Z, et al. Timedomain optical mammography SoftScan: initial results. Acad Radiol 2005;52(8):934-947.
20. Arridge SR. Optical tomography in medical imaging. Inverse Probl 1999;55(2):R41-R93.
21. Schöder H, Gönen M. Screening for cancer with PET and PET/CT: potential and limitations. J Nucl Med 2007;58(suppl 1):4S-18S.
22. Fang Q, Carp SA, Selb J, et al. Combined optical imaging and mammography of the healthy breast: optical contrast derived from breast structure and compression. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;58(1):30-42.
23. Boas D, Gaudette T, Arridge S. Simultaneous imaging and optode calibration with diffuse optical tomography. Opt Express 2001;5(5):263-270.
24. Li A, Zhang Q, Culver JP, Miller EL, Boas DA. Reconstructing chromosphere concen tration images directly by continuous-wave diffuse optical tomography. Opt Lett 2004;59(3):256-258.
25. Srinivasan S, Pogue BW, Jiang S, Dehghani H, Paulsen KD. Spectrally constrained chromophore and scattering near-infrared tomography provides quantitative and robust reconstruction. Appl Opt 2005;54(10):1858-1869.
26. Fang Q, Meaney PM, Paulsen KD. Microwave image reconstruction of tissue property dispersion characteristics utilizing multiple frequency information. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 2004;52(8):1866-1875.
27. Yalavarthy PK, Dehghani H, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD. Critical computational aspects of near infrared circular tomographic imaging: analysis of measurement number, mesh resolution and reconstruction basis. Opt Express 2006;54(13):6113-6127.
28. Srinivasan S, Pogue BW, Jiang S, et al. In vivo hemoglobin and water concentrations, oxygen saturation, and scattering estimates from near-infrared breast tomography using spectral reconstruction. Acad Radiol 2006;53(2):195-202.
29. Cerussi AE, Berger AJ, Bevilacqua F, et al. Sources of absorption and scattering contrast for near-infrared optical mammography. Acad Radiol 2001;5(3):211-218.
30. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006;51(3):1116-1128.
31. Carp SA, Kauffman T, Fang Q, et al. Compression-induced changes in the physiological state of the breast as observed through frequency domain photon migration measurements. J Biomed Opt 2006;51(6):064016.
32. American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas. Reston, V a: American College of Radiology, 2003.
33. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Wells W A, et al. Electromagnetic breast imaging: results of a pilot study in women with abnormal mammograms. Radiology 2007;543(2):350-359.
34. Li A, Miller EL, Kilmer ME, et al. Tomographic optical breast imaging guided by three-dimensional mammography. Appl Opt 2003;52(25):5181-5190.
35. Dehghani H, Carpenter CM, Yalavarthy PK, Pogue BW, Culver JP. Structural a priori information in near-infrared optical tomography. In: Azar FS, ed. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2007-multimodal biomedical imaging II. Vol 6431. Bellingham, Wash: The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2007;5-5.
36. Guven M, Yazici B, Intes X, Chance B. Diffuse optical tomography with a priori anatomical information. Phys Med Biol 2005;50(12):2837-2858.