A high throughput mechanical screening device for cartilage tissue engineering

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2130-2136

  Mohanraj, Bhavana ^a,c   Hou, Chieh ^a   Meloni, Gregory R ^a   Cosgrove, Brian D ^a,b   Dodge, George R ^a,b   Mauck, Robert L ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b AO FOUNDATION   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

3D culture; High throughput screening; Mechanical testing

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CARTILAGE; COMPRESSION TESTING; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL TESTING; REPAIR; THROUGHPUT; TISSUE;

3-D CULTURES; ARTICULAR CARTILAGES; CARTILAGE TISSUE ENGINEERING; DESIGN PARAMETERS; ENGINEERED CARTILAGE; FORCE SENSITIVITY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

BIOMATERIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CALIBRATION; CARTILAGE; CARTILAGE TISSUE ENGINEERING; COMPRESSION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONICS; FORCE SENSITIVITY; HIGH THROUGHPUT MECHANICAL SCREENING DEVICE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VALIDATION STUDY;

3D CULTURE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; MECHANICAL TESTING;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84901633883     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.043     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Appel B., Baumer J., et al. Synergistic effects of growth and differentiation factor-5 (GDF-5) and insulin on expanded chondrocytes in a 3-D environment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17(11):1503-1512.
2. Ateshian G.A., Hung C.T. Patellofemoral joint biomechanics and tissue engineering. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005, 436:81-90.
3. Bian L., Fong J.V., et al. Dynamic mechanical loading enhances functional properties of tissue-engineered cartilage using mature canine chondrocytes. Tissue Eng. Part A 2010, 16(5):1781-1790.
4. Blunk T., Sieminski A.L., et al. Differential effects of growth factors on tissue-engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng. 2002, 8(1):73-84.
5. Brey D.M., Motlekar N.A., et al. High-throughput screening of a small molecule library for promoters and inhibitors of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108(1):163-174.
6. Burdick J.A., Chung C., et al. Controlled degradation and mechanical behavior of photopolymerized hyaluronic acid networks. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6(1):386-391.
7. Byers B.A., Mauck R.L., Chang I.E., Tuan R.S. Transient exposure to TGF-B3 under serum-free conditions enhances the biomechanical and biochemical maturation of tissue-engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng. Part A 2008, 14(11):1821-1834.
8. Cheng N.C., Estes B.T., et al. Engineered cartilage using primary chondrocytes cultured in a porous cartilage-derived matrix. Regen. Med. 2011, 6(1):81-93.
9. Chung C., Beecham M., et al. The influence of degradation characteristics of hyaluronic acid hydrogels on in vitro neocartilage formation by mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2009, 30(26):4287-4296.
10. Chung C., Burdick J.A. Influence of three-dimensional hyaluronic acid microenvironments on mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis. Tissue Eng. Part A 2009, 15(2):243-254.
11. Drews J. Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science 2000, 287(5460):1960-1964.
12. Erickson I.E., Huang A.H., et al. Differential maturation and structure-function relationships in mesenchymal stem cell- and chondrocyte-seeded hydrogels. Tissue Eng. Part A 2009, 15(5):1041-1052.
13. Erickson I.E., Kestle S.R., et al. High mesenchymal stem cell seeding densities in hyaluronic acid hydrogels produce engineered cartilage with native tissue properties. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8(8):3027-3034.
14. Farndale R.W., Buttle D.J., et al. Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1986, 883(2):173-177.
15. Gooch K.J., Blunk T., et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins-2, -12, and -13 modulate in vitro development of engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng. 2002, 8(4):591-601.
16. Huang A.H., Farrell M.J., et al. Mechanics and mechanobiology of mesenchymal stem cell-based engineered cartilage. J. Biomech. 2010, 43(1):128-136.
17. Huang A.H., Motlekar N.A., et al. High-throughput screening for modulators of mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 36(11):1909-1921.
18. Huang A.H., Stein A., Mauck R.L. Evalution of the complex transcriptional topography of mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 2010, 16(9):2699-2708.
19. Hwang N.S., Varghese S., et al. Regulation of osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in PEG-ECM hydrogels. Cell Tissue Res. 2011, 344(3):499-509.
20. Johnson K., Zhu S., et al. A stem cell-based approach to cartilage repair. Science 2012, 336(6082):717-721.
21. Johnstone B., Alini M., et al. Tissue engineering for articular cartilage repair-the state of the art. Eur. Cell Mater. 2013, 25:248-267.
22. Kelly T.A., Ng K.W., et al. Spatial and temporal development of chondrocyte-seeded agarose constructs in free-swelling and dynamically loaded cultures. J. Biomech. 2006, 39(8):1489-1497.
23. Kunz-Schughart L.A. The use of 3-D cultures for high-throughput screening: the multicellular spheroid model. J. Biomol. Screening 2004, 9(4):273-285.
24. Lima E.G., Bian L., et al. The beneficial effect of delayed compressive loading on tissue-engineered cartilage constructs cultured with TGF-beta3. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15(9):1025-1033.
25. Lujan T.J., Wirtz K.M., et al. A novel bioreactor for the dynamic stimulation and mechanical evaluation of multiple tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2011, 17(3):367-374.
26. Mauck R.L., Soltz M.A., et al. Functional tissue engineering of articular cartilage through dynamic loading of chondrocyte-seeded agarose gels. J. Biomech. Eng. 2000, 122(3):252-260.
27. Mauck R.L., Wang C.C.B., et al. The role of cell seeding density and nutrient supply for articular cartilage tissue engineering with deformational loading. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003, 11(12):879-890.
28. Mauck R.L., Yuan X., et al. Chondrogenic differentiation and functional maturation of bovine mesenchymal stem cells in long-term agarose culture. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, 14(2):179-189.
29. Moutos F.T., Guilak F. Functional properties of cell-seeded three-dimensionally woven poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 2010, 16(4):1291-1301.
30. Mouw J.K., Case N.D., et al. Variations in matrix composition and GAG fine structure among scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 13(9):828-836.
31. Ng K.W., Mauck R.L., et al. Duty cycle of deformational loading influences the growth of engineered articular cartilage. Cell Mol. Bioeng. 2009, 2(3):386-394.
32. Ng K.W., O'Conor C.J., et al. Transient supplementation of anabolic growth factors rapidly stimulates matrix synthesis in engineered cartilage. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 39(10):2491-2500.
33. Novotny J.E., Turka C.M., et al. Biomechanical and magnetic resonance characteristics of a cartilage-like equivalent generated in a suspension culture. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12(10):2755-2764.
34. Salvetti D.J., Pino C.J., et al. Design and validation of a compressive tissue stimulator with high-throughput capacity and real-time modulus measurement capability. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2012, 18(3):205-214.
35. Soltz M.A., Ateshian G.A. A Conewise Linear Elasticity mixture model for the analysis of tension-compression nonlinearity in articular cartilage. J. Biomech. Eng. 2000, 122(6):576-586.
36. Thorpe S.D., Buckley C.T., et al. The response of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to dynamic compression following TGF-beta3 induced chondrogenic differentiation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38(9):2896-2909.
37. Vandenburgh H. High-content drug screening with engineered musculoskeletal tissues. Tissue Eng. Part B 2010, 16(1):55-64.
38. Weinand C., Xu J.W., et al. Conditions affecting cell seeding onto three-dimensional scaffolds for cellular-based biodegradable implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2009, 91(1):80-87.
39. Zhang J.-H., Chung T.D.Y., et al. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J. Biomol. Screen 1999, 4:67-73.
40. Zhang X.D. A pair of new statistical parameters for quality control in RNA interference high-throughput screening assays. Genomics 2007, 89(4):552-561.
41. Zhang X.D. Illustration of SSMD, z score, SSMD, z score, and t statistic for hit selection in RNAi high-throughput screens. J. Biomol. Screening 2011, 16(7):775-785.
42. Zhang X.D. Optimal High-Throughput Screening: Practical Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Genome-Scale RNAi Research 2011, Cambridge University Press, New York.
43. Zhang X.D., Ferrer M., et al. The use of strictly standardized mean difference for hit selection in primary RNA interference high-throughput screening experiments. J. Biomol. Screening 2007, 12(4):497-509.