Diagnostic assessment by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance in differentiation of breast lesions under different imaging protocols

BMC Cancer

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Cai, Hongmin ^a   Liu, Lizhi ^b   Peng, Yanxia ^c   Wu, Yaopan ^b   Li, Li ^b  

^a SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY CANCER CENTER   (China)

^c THE THIRD AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Breast mass; Classifier; Computer aided diagnosis; Diffusion weighted imaging; Feature subset selection; Quantitative morphology and texture features

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; CLASSIFIER; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC USE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901626629     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-366     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007, 57(2):75-89. 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75, 17392385.
2. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, Kuhn W, Schild HH. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007, 370(9586):485-492. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61232-X, 17693177.
3. Bartholow T, Becich M, Chandran U, Parwani A. Immunohistochemical analysis of ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 in prostatic adenocarcinoma. BMC Urol 2011, 11(1):12. 10.1186/1471-2490-11-12, 3132203, 21672215.
4. Yoshikawa MI, Ohsumi S, Sugata S, Kataoka M, Takashima S, Kikuchi K, Mochizuki T. Comparison of breast cancer detection by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and mammography. Radiat Med 2007, 25(5):218-223. 10.1007/s11604-007-0128-4, 17581710.
5. Iima M, Le Bihan D, Okumura R, Okada T, Fujimoto K, Kanao S, Tanaka S, Fujimoto M, Sakashita H, Togashi K. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study. Radiology 2011, 260(2):364-372. 10.1148/radiol.11101892, 21633054.
6. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007, 17(10):2646-2655. 10.1007/s00330-007-0621-2, 17356840.
7. Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Oda Y, Tsuneyoshi M, Honda H. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008, 7(1):23-29. 10.2463/mrms.7.23, 18460845.
8. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, Gao YG, An NY, Ma L, Mahankali S, Gao JH. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002, 16(2):172-178. 10.1002/jmri.10140, 12203765.
9. Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, Allain MD, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Lehman CD. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. Am J Roentgenol 2010, 194(6):1664-1673.
10. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, DeBruhl N, Bassett LW. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: Potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002, 15(6):693-704. 10.1002/jmri.10116, 12112520.
11. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S, Hata H, Ozaki M, Iwabuchi K, Kuranami M, Watanabe M, Hayakawa K. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005, 4(1):35-42. 10.2463/mrms.4.35, 16127252.
12. Pickles M, Manton D, Lowry M, Turnbull L. Prognostic value of pre-treatment DCE-MRI parameters in predicting disease free and overall survival for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Radiol 2009, 71(3):498-505. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.05.007, 18572340.
13. Su MY, Cheung YC, Fruehauf JP, Yu H, Nalcioglu O, Mechetner E, Kyshtoobayeva A, Chen SC, Hsueh S, McLaren CE. Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 18(4):467-477. 10.1002/jmri.10380, 14508784.
14. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193(6):1716-1722.
15. Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Schelfhout AM, Leyman P, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Van Den Haute J, Gillardin JP, Tjalma W, Van Der A, Buytaert JC. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30(5):501-507. 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.02.003, 15135477.
16. Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS, Abe H, Schmidt RA, Giger M, Newstead GM. DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement?. Med Phys 2008, 35(7):3102-3109. 10.1118/1.2936220, 2673559, 18697535.
17. Zhang Y, Fukatsu H, Naganawa S, Satake H, Sato Y, Ohiwa M, Endo T, Ichihara S, Ishigaki T. The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 2002, 9(3):231-239. 10.1007/BF02967595, 12185335.
18. Kuhl CK. MRI of breast tumors. Eur Radiol 2000, 10(1):46-58. 10.1007/s003300050006, 10663717.
19. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Kamitani T, Soeda H, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Kubo M, Sadanaga N, Yamamoto H, Honda H. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 28(5):1157-1165. 10.1002/jmri.21570, 18972357.
20. Yili Z, Xiaoyan H, Hongwen D, Yun Z, Xin C, Peng W, Youmin G. The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing the ADC changes of tissues adjacent to breast carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2009, 9(1):18. 10.1186/1471-2407-9-18, 2633008, 19144163.
21. Mendez A, Pizzorni Ferrarese F, Summers P, Petralia G, Menegaz G. DCE-MRI and DWI integration for breast lesions assessment and heterogeneity quantification. Int J Biomed Imaging 2012, 2012:2-4.
22. Cheng HD, Shan J, Ju W, Guo Y, Zhang L. Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: A survey. Pattern Recogn 2010, 43(1):299-317.
23. Sahiner B, Chan H, Roubidoux MA, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA, Paramagul C, Bailey J, Nees AV, Blane C. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 2007, 242(3):716-724. 10.1148/radiol.2423051464, 2800986, 17244717.
24. Shen WC, Chang RF, Moon WK, Chou YH, Huang CS. Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features. Acad Radiol 2007, 14(8):928-939. 10.1016/j.acra.2007.04.016, 17659238.
25. Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaum KS, Fajardo LL, Reinhardt JM. Breast MRI lesion classification: Improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25(1):89-95. 10.1002/jmri.20794, 17154399.
26. Huang Y, Wang K, Chen D. Diagnosis of breast tumors with ultrasonic texture analysis using support vector machines. Neural Comput Appl 2006, 15(2):164-169.
27. Yankeelov TE, Lepage M, Chakravarthy A, Broome EE, Niermann KJ, Kelley MC, Meszoely I, Mayer IA, Herman CR, McManus K, Price RR, Gore JC. Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25(1):1-13. 10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.006, 2634832, 17222711.
28. Woodhams R, Ramadan S, Stanwell P, Sakamoto S, Hata H, Ozaki M, Kan S, Inoue Y. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications. Radiographics 2011, 31(4):1059-1084. 10.1148/rg.314105160, 21768239.
29. Agner SC, Soman S, Libfeld E, McDonald M, Thomas K, Englander S, Rosen MA, Chin D, Nosher J, Madabhushi A. Textural kinetics: a novel dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI feature for breast lesion classification. J Digit Imaging 2011, 24(3):446-463. 10.1007/s10278-010-9298-1, 3092055, 20508965.
30. Nie K, Chen J, Yu HJ, Chu Y, Nalcioglu O, Su M. Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol 2008, 15(12):1513-1525. 10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.005, 2791407, 19000868.
31. Chen H, Yang B, Liu J, Liu D. A support vector machine classifier with rough set-based feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38(7):9014-9022.
32. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 2002, 46(1-3):389-422.
33. Akay MF. Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis. Expert Syst Appl 2009, 36(2):3240-3247.
34. Shakhnarovich G, Darrell T, Indyk P. Nearest-Neighbor Methods in Learning and Vision: Theory and Practice, vol. 3 2005, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press.
35. Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A. Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif Intell Med 2005, 34(2):113-127. 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.07.002, 15894176.
36. Wu K. Analysis of parameter selections for fuzzy c-means. Pattern Recogn 2012, 45(1):407-415.
37. Xu C, Prince JL. Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans Image Process 1998, 7(3):359-369. 10.1109/83.661186, 18276256.
38. Chang RF, Wu WJ, Moon WK, Chen DR. Improvement in breast tumor discrimination by support vector machines and speckle-emphasis texture analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003, 29(5):679-686. 10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00788-3, 12754067.
39. Basu S, Hall LO, Goldgof DB, Yuhua G, Kumar V, Jung C, Gillies RJ, Gatenby RA. Developing a Classifier Model for Lung Tumors in CT-Scan Images. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2011 IEEE International Conference on: 2014-01-09 2011 2011, 1306-1312. Anchorage: IEEE.
40. Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM, Cendes F. Texture analysis of medical images. Clin Radiol 2004, 59(12):1061-1069. 10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.008, 15556588.
41. Hylton NM. Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001, 9(2):321-332.
42. Abdolmaleki P, Buadu LD, Naderimansh H. Feature extraction and classification of breast cancer on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using artificial neural network. Cancer Lett 2001, 171(2):183-191. 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00508-0, 11520602.
43. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 1999, 211(1):101-110. 10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap38101, 10189459.
44. Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24(2):319-324. 10.1002/jmri.20643, 16786565.
45. Wenkel E, Geppert C, Schulz-Wendtland R, Uder M, Kiefer B, Bautz W, Janka R. Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Acad Radiol 2007, 14(9):1077-1083. 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.006, 17707315.
46. Petralia G, Bonello L, Priolo F, Summers P, Bellomi M. Breast MR with special focus on DW-MRI and DCE-MRI. Cancer Imaging 2011, 11:76-90. 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0014, 3205756, 21771711.
47. Cai H, Ng M. Feature weighting by RELIEF based on local hyperplane approximation. Proceedings of the 16th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - Volume Part II:2012 2012, 335-346. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Springer-Verlag.
48. Cai H, Ng M. Optimal Combination of Feature Weight Learning and Classification Based on Local Approximation. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Data and Knowledge Engineering: November 21-23, 2012, Fujian 2012, 86-94. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, Yang X.
49. Cai H, Ruan P, Ng M, Akutsu T. Feature weight estimation for gene selection: a local hyperlinear learning approach. BMC Bioinforma 2014, 15(1):70.