Models for anticipating non-motorized travel choices, and the role of the built environment

Transport Policy

Volumn 35, Issue , 2014, Pages 117-126

  Khan, Mobashwir ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^b   Xiong, Xiaoxia ^c  

^a Travel Demand Modeler Cambridge Systematics   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Built environment; Cyclists; Demand modeling; Non motorized transport; Pedestrians

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; CAR OWNERSHIP; CYCLE TRANSPORT; METROPOLITAN AREA; NEIGHBORHOOD; PEDESTRIAN; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; WALKING;

SEATTLE; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 84901619154     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
2. Cambridge Systematics PSRC 2006 Household Activity Survey Analysis Report 2007, Prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Sammamish, Washington.
3. Cao X., Handy S.L., Mokhtarian P.L. The influences of built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation 2006, 33:1-20.
4. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S. Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-selection on Travel Behavior: Methodologies and Empirical Findings 2006, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Davis, (UCS-ITS-RR-06-18), Davis, California, USA.
5. Cervero R., Duncan M. Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Am. J. Public Health 2003, 93(9):1478-1483.
6. Cervero R. Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transp. Res. Part D 2002, 7:265-284.
7. Cervero R., Sarmiento O., Jacoby E., Gomez L.F., Neiman A. Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: lessons from Bogota. Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 2009, 3(4):203-226.
8. Dill, J., Gliebe, J., 2008. Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: A Focus on Travel Time and Route Choice. Final Report Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium-RR-08-03.
9. Ewing R., Cervero R. Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2010, 76(3):265-294.
10. Frank L., Engelke P. The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. J. Plann. Lit. 2001, 16:202-218.
11. Frank L.M., Bradley, Kavage S., Chapman J., Lawton T.K. Urban Form, travel time and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation 2008, 35:37-54.
12. Greene W. Econometric Analysis 2011, Prentice Hall, New York. 7th ed.
13. Handy S.L., Niemeier D.A. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environ. Plan. A 1997, 29:1175-1194.
14. Khan, M., 2012. Topics in Sustainable Transportation: Opportunities for Long-term Plug-in Electric Vehicle Use and Non-Motorized Travel (Master's thesis). Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin. Available from:. https://repositories1.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/ETD-UT-2012-05-5800/KHAN-THESIS.pdf?sequence=1.
15. Khattak A., Rodriguez D. Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: a case study in U.S.A. Transp. Res. A 2005, 39(6):481-500.
16. Kitamura R., Mokhtarian P., Laidet L. A micro-analysis of land-use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 1997, 24:125-158.
17. Kuzmyak, J.R., Kockelman, K., Bowman J., Bradle M., Lawton, K., Pratt, R.H., 2011. Estimating Bicycling and Walking for Planning and Project Development. Task 3 Interim Report. NCHRP Project no. 08-78.
18. Litman T. Integrating public health objectives in transportation decision-making. Am J Health Promotion 2003, 18(1):103-108.
19. Litman T. Quantifying the benefits of non-motorized transport for achieving TDM objectives 1999, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
20. Moudon A.V., Lee C., Cheadle A., Collier C., Johnson D., Schmid T., Weather R. Cycling and the built environment, a US Perspective. Transp. Res. Part D 2005, 10:245-261.
21. Newman P., Kenworthy J. Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis 2006, 2(1). (35-2).
22. Niemeier D.A. Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation 1997, 24:377-396.
23. Pratt, R. et al., 2012. Traveler response to transportation system changes: pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Transit Cooperative Highway Research Program (TCRP). Report 95, Chapter 16.
24. PSRC, 2006. Puget Sound Regional Council 2006 Household Activity Survey. Available from:. http://psrc.org/data/surveys/2006-household.
25. Rietveld P. Biking and walking: The position of non-motorized transport modes in transport systems. Handbook of Transport Systems and Traffic Control 2001, 299-320. Elsevier Sceinece Ltd., Oxford. B. Kenneth, H. David (Eds.).
26. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 2004, 31:759-784.
27. Stinson M.A., Bhat C.R. Frequency of bicycle commuting: internet-based survey analysis. Transp. Res. Record 2004, 1878:122-130.
28. Zhou B., Kockelman K. Self-selection in home choice: use of treatment effects in evaluating the relationship between the built environment and travel behavior. Transp. Res. Record 2008, 2077:54-61.