Cell polarization energy and its implications for cell migration

Comptes Rendus - Mecanique

Volumn 342, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 334-346

  Zhong, Yuan ^a   He, Shijie ^a   Dong, Chunying ^a   Ji, Baohua ^a   Hu, Gengkai ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Cell polarity; Cell shape; Driving force of cell migration; Matrix rigidity

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; CHEMOTAXIS; POLARIZATION; RIGIDITY; SUBSTRATE;

EID: 84901489683     PISSN: 16310721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.2014.02.006     Document Type: Short Survey

References (64)

1. Mogilner A., Keren K. The shape of motile cells. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:R762-R771.
2. Mseka T., Bamburg J.R., Cramer L.P. ADF/cofilin family proteins control formation of oriented actin-filament bundles in the cell body to trigger fibroblast polarization. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120:4332-4344.
3. Prager-Khoutorsky M., Lichtenstein A., Krishnan R., Rajendran K., Mayo A., Kam Z., Geiger B., Bershadsky A.D. Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1457-1465.
4. Verkhovsky A.B., Svitkina T.M., Borisy G.G. Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9:11-20.
5. Burton K., Park J.H., Taylor D.L. Keratocytes generate traction forces in two phases. Mol. Biol. Cell 1999, 10:3745-3769.
6. Munevar S., Wang Y.L., Dembo M. Distinct roles of frontal and rear cell-substrate adhesions in fibroblast migration. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12:3947-3954.
7. Cramer L.P. Forming the cell rear first: breaking cell symmetry to trigger directed cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:628-632.
8. Mseka T., Cramer L.P. Actin depolymerization-based force retracts the cell rear in polarizing and migrating cells. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:2085-2091.
9. Wang Y.L. Reorganization of actin filament bundles in living fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 1984, 99:1478-1485.
10. Verkhovsky A.B., Svitkina T.M., Borisy G.G. Myosin-II filament assemblies in the active lamella of fibroblasts-their morphogenesis and role in the formation of actin filament bundles. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 131:989-1002.
11. Svitkina T.M., Verkhovsky A.B., McQuade K.M., Borisy G.G. Analysis of the actin-myosin II system in fish epidermal keratocytes: mechanism of cell body translocation. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 139:397-415.
12. Kozlov M.M., Mogilner A. Model of polarization and bistability of cell fragments. Biophys. J. 2007, 93:3811-3819.
13. Vianay B., Kaefer J., Planus E., Block M., Graner F., Guillou H. Single cells spreading on a protein lattice adopt an energy minimizing shape. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105.
14. Ujihara Y., Nakamura M., Miyazaki H., Wada S. Proposed spring network cell model based on a minimum energy concept. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38:1530-1538.
15. Du X., Doubrovinski K., Osterfield M. Self-organized cell motility from motor-filament interactions. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:1738-1745.
16. Bar-Ziv R., Tlusty T., Moses E., Safran S.A., Bershadsky A. Pearling in cells: a clue to understanding cell shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96:10140-10145.
17. Bischofs I.B., Schmidt S.S., Schwarz U.S. Effect of adhesion geometry and rigidity on cellular force distributions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103:048101.
18. Khatiwala C.B., Peyton S.R., Putnam A.J. Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Am. J. Physiol., Cell Physiol. 2006, 290:C1640-C1650.
19. Peyton S.R., Putnam A.J. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion. J. Cell. Physiol. 2005, 204:198-209.
20. Kim D.-H., Han K., Gupta K., Kwon K.W., Suh K.-Y., Levchenko A. Mechanosensitivity of fibroblast cell shape and movement to anisotropic substratum topography gradients. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5433-5444.
21. Mogilner A., Oster G. Polymer motors: pushing out the front and pulling up the back. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:R721-R733.
22. Mogilner A. Mathematics of cell motility: have we got its number?. J. Math. Biol. 2009, 58:105-134.
23. Dokukina I.V., Gracheva M.E. A model of fibroblast motility on substrates with different rigidities. Biophys. J. 2010, 98:2794-2803.
24. Sarvestani A.S. A model for cell motility on soft bio-adhesive substrates. J. Biomech. 2011, 44:755-758.
25. Lee J., Ishihara A., Theriot J.A., Jacobson K. Principles of locomotion for simple-shaped cells. Nature 1993, 362:167-171.
26. Keren K., Pincus Z., Allen G.M., Barnhart E.L., Marriott G., Mogilner A., Theriot J.A. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 2008, 453:475-480.
27. Barnhart E.L., Lee K.-C., Keren K., Mogilner A., Theriot J.A. An adhesion-dependent switch between mechanisms that determine motile cell shape. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9.
28. Zand M.S., Albrechtbuehler G. What structures, besides adhesions, prevent spread cells from rounding up. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 1989, 13:195-211.
29. Fisher G.W., Conrad P.A., Debiasio R.L., Taylor D.L. Centripetal transport of cytoplasm, actin, and the cell surface in lamellipodia of fibroblasts. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 1988, 11:235-247.
30. Rid R., Schiefermeier N., Grigoriev I., Small J.V., Kaverina I. The last but not the least: the origin and significance of trailing adhesions in fibroblastic cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 2005, 61:161-171.
31. Lu L., Feng Y., Hucker W.J., Oswald S.J., Longmore G.D., Yin F.C.P. Actin stress fiber pre-extension in human aortic endothelial cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 2008, 65:281-294.
32. Ji B., Bao G. Cell and molecular biomechanics: perspectives and challenges. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 2011, 24:27-51.
33. Zhong Y., Kong D., Dai L., Ji B. Frequency-dependent focal adhesion instability and cell reorientation under cyclic substrate stretching. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2011, 4:442-456.
34. Paul R., Heil P., Spatz J.P., Schwarz U.S. Propagation of mechanical stress through the actin cytoskeleton toward focal adhesions: model and experiment. Biophys. J. 2008, 94:1470-1482.
35. Deguchi S., Ohashi T., Sato M. Tensile properties of single stress fibers isolated from cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:2603-2610.
36. They M., Pein A., Dressaire E., Chen Y., Bornens M. Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 2006, 63:341-355.
37. Bischofs I.B., Klein F., Lehnert D., Bastmeyer M., Schwarz U.S. Filamentous network mechanics and active contractility determine cell and tissue shape. Biophys. J. 2008, 95(7):3488-3496. 10.1529/biophysj.108.134296.
38. Kendall K. The adhesion and surface energy of elastic solids. J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys. 1971, 4:1186-1195.
39. Peng X., Huang J., Xiong C., Fang J. Cell adhesion nucleation regulated by substrate stiffness: a Monte Carlo study. J. Biomech. 2012, 45:116-122.
40. Dunn G.A., Zicha D. Dynamics of fibroblast spreading. J. Cell Sci. 1995, 108:1239-1249.
41. Dai J.W., Sheetz M.P., Wan X.D., Morris C.E. Membrane tension in swelling and shrinking molluscan neurons. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18:6681-6692.
42. Helfrich W. Elasticity and Thermal Undulations of Fluid Films of Amphiphiles 1990, Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
43. Lee J., Jacobson K. The composition and dynamics of cell-substratum adhesions in locomoting fish keratocytes. J. Cell Sci. 1997, 110:2833-2844.
44. Beningo K.A., Dembo M., Kaverina I., Small J.V., Wang Y.-l. Nascent focal adhesions are responsible for the generation of strong propulsive forces in migrating fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153:881-888.
45. Ji B., Huo B. Probing the mechanosensitivity in cell adhesion and migration: experiments and modeling. Acta Mech. Sin. 2013, 29:469-484.
46. Tan J.L., Tien J., Pirone D.M., Gray D.S., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. From the cover: cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100:1484-1489.
47. Bershadsky A.D., Balaban N.Q., Geiger B. Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2003, 19:677-695.
48. Balaban N.Q., Schwarz U.S., Riveline D., Goichberg P., Tzur G., Sabanay I., Mahalu D., Safran S.A., Bershadsky A., Addadi L., Geiger B. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3:466-472.
49. Lemmon C.A., Romer L.H. A predictive model of cell traction forces based on cell geometry. Biophys. J. 2010, 99:L78-L80.
50. Zhong Y., Ji B. Impact of cell shape on cell migration behavior on elastic substrate. Biofabrication 2013, 5:015011.
51. Rape A.D., Guo W.-h., Wang Y.-l. The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2043-2051.
52. Stricker J., Aratyn-Schaus Y., Oakes P.W., Gardel M.L. Spatiotemporal constraints on the force-dependent growth of focal adhesions. Biophys. J. 2011, 100:2883-2893.
53. Zhong Y., He S., Ji B. Mechanics in mechanosensitivity of cell adhesion and its roles in cell migration. Int. J. Comput. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2012, 1:1250032.
54. Aroush D.R.B., Zaidel-Bar R., Bershadsky A.D., Wagner H.D. Temporal evolution of cell focal adhesions: experimental observations and shear stress profiles. Soft Matter 2008, 4:2410-2417.
55. Kong D., Ji B.H., Dai L.H. Stabilizing to disruptive transition of focal adhesion response to mechanical forces. J. Biomech. 2010, 43:2524-2529.
56. Galbraith C.G., Yamada K.M., Sheetz M.P. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 159:695-705.
57. Goffin J.M., Pittet P., Csucs G., Lussi J.W., Meister J.J., Hinz B. Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of alpha-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 172:259-268.
58. Lo C.-M., Wang H.-B., Dembo M., Wang Y.-l. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 2000, 79:144-152.
59. Kong D., Ji B., Dai L. Stability of adhesion clusters and cell reorientation under lateral cyclic tension. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:4034-4044.
60. Kong D., Ji B., Dai L. Nonlinear mechanical modeling of cell adhesion. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 250:75-84.
61. Jurado C., Haserick J.R., Lee J. Slipping or gripping? Fluorescent speckle microscopy in fish keratocytes reveals two different mechanisms for generating a retrograde flow of actin. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:507-518.
62. Abraham V.C., Krishnamurthi V., Taylor D.L., Lanni F. The actin-based nanomachine at the leading edge of migrating cells. Biophys. J. 1999, 77:1721-1732.
63. Pelham R.J., Wang Y.L. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:13661-13665.
64. Solon J., Levental I., Sengupta K., Georges P.C., Janmey P.A. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys. J. 2007, 93:4453-4461.