The "I" in climate: The role of individual responsibility in systematic processing of climate change information

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 39-52

  Rickard, Laura N ^a   Yang, Z Janet ^b   Seo, Mihye ^c   Harrison, Teresa M ^c  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Attribution of responsibility; Climate change; Information processing; Risk Information Seeking and Processing model; Risk perception

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; CLIMATE CHANGE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 84901439522     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Bain P.G., Hornsey M.J., Bongiorno R., Jeffries C. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat. Climate Change 2012, 2:600-603. 10.1038/nclimate1532.
2. Barry C.L., Gollust S.E., Niederdeppe J. Are Americans ready to solve the weight of the nation?. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367(5):389-391. 10.1056/NEJMp1206519.
3. Bickerstaff K., Simmons P., Pidgeon N. Constructing responsibilities for risk: negotiating citizen-state relationships. Environ. Plan. A 2008, 40(6):1312. 10.1068/a39150.
4. Bickerstaff K., Walker G. Risk, responsibility, and blame: an analysis of vocabularies of motive in air-pollution (ing) discourses. Environ. Plan. A 2002, 34(12):2175-2192. 10.1068/a3521.
5. Bostrom A., O'Connor R.E., Bohm G., Hanss D., Bodi O., Ekstrom F., Saelensminde I. Causal thinking and support for climate change policies: international survey findings. Global Environ. Change 2012, 22:210-222. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.012.
6. Brickman P., Rabinowitz V.C., Karuza J., Coates D., Cohn E., Kidder L. Models of helping and coping. Am. Psychol. 1982, 37:368-384. 10.1037/0003-066X.37.4.368.
7. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1980, 39:752-766. 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752.
8. Chaiken S., Giner-Sorolla R., Chen S. Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. The Psychology of Action: Linking Motivation and Cognition to Behavior 1996, 553-578. Guilford Press, New York. P.M. Gollwitzer, J.A. Bargh (Eds.).
9. Chaiken S., Liberman A., Eagly A.H. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. Unintended Thought 1989, 212-252. Guilford Press, New York. J.S. Uleman, J.A. Bargh (Eds.).
10. Chen S., Chaiken S. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology 1999, 73-96. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
11. Clements J.M., McCright A.M., Xiao C. Green Christians? An empirical examination of environmental concern within the U.S. general public. Org. Environ. 2013, 10.1177/1086026613495475.
12. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2003, Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 3rd ed.
13. Ditto P.H., Scepansky J.A., Munro G.D., Apanovitch A.M., Lockhart L.K. Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 75:53-69.
14. Druckman J.N., Bolsen T. Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. J. Commun. 2011, 61:659-688.
15. Eagly A., Chaiken S. The Psychology of Attitudes 1993, Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX.
16. Frijda N.H., Kuipers P., ter Schure E. Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1989, 57:212-228.
17. Gifford R., Comeau L.A. Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement and behavioral intentions. Global Environ. Change 2011, 21:1301-1307.
18. Gillis J. Heat-trapping gas passes milestone, raising fears. The New York Times 2013, May, Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?ref=earth.
19. Griffin R.J., Dunwoody S., Neuwirth K. Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environ. Res. 1999, 80(2):S230.
20. Griffin R.J., Neuwirth K., Dunwoody S., Giese J. Information sufficiency and risk communication. Media Psychol. 2004, 6:23-61.
21. Griffin R.J., Neuwirth K., Giese J., Dunwoody S. Linking the heuristic-systematic model and depth of processing. Commun. Res. 2002, 29:705-732. 10.1177/009365002237833.
22. Griffin R.J., Yang Z.J., Boerner F., Bourassa S., Darrah T., Knurek S., Dunwoody S. Applying an information seeking and processing model to a study of communication about energy. Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication 2005.
23. Griffin R.J., Yang Z.J., ter Huurne E., Boerner F., Ortiz S., Dunwoody S. After the flood: anger, attribution, and the seeking of information. Sci. Commun. 2008, 29:285-315. 10.1177/1075547007312309.
24. Hart P.S. One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Sci. Commun. 2011, 33:28-51.
25. Hart P.S., Nisbet E.C. Boomerang effects in science communication: how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun. Res. 2012, 39:701-723.
26. Hayes A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach 2013, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
27. Heider F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations 1982, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
28. Hernandez I., Preston J.L. Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2013, 49:178-182. 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.010.
29. Hovick S.R., Freimuth V.S., Johnson-Turbes A., Chervin D.D. Multiple health risk perception and information processing among African Americans and Whites living in poverty. Risk Anal. 2011, 31:1789-1799. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01621.x.
30. Iyengar S. How citizens think about national issues: a matter of responsibility. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 1989, 33(4):878-900.
31. Iyengar S. Framing responsibility for political issues: the case of poverty. Polit. Behav. 1990, 12:19-40.
32. Jang S.M. Framing responsibility in climate change discourse: ethnocentric attribution bias, perceived causes, and policy attitudes. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 36:27-36. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.003.
33. Jeong S. Effects of news about genetics and obesity on controllability attribution and helping behavior. Health Commun. 2007, 22:221-228. 10.1080/10410230701626877.
34. Kahan D.M., Peters E., Wittlin M., Slovic P., Ouellette L.L., Braman D., Mandel G. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Climate Change 2012, 2:732-735. 10.1038/nclimate1547.
35. Kahlor L. An augmented risk information seeking model: the case of global warming. Media Psychol. 2007, 10:414-435. 10.1080/15213260701532971.
36. Kahlor L. PRISM: a planned risk information seeking model. Health Commun. 2010, 25:345-356.
37. Kahlor L., Dunwoody S., Griffin R.J. Attributions in explanations of risk estimates. Public Understand. Sci. 2002, 11:243-257.
38. Kahlor L., Dunwoody S., Griffin R.J., Neuwirth K., Giese J. Studying heuristic-systematic processing of risk communication. Risk Anal. 2003, 23:355-368. 10.1111/1539-6924.00314.
39. Kouabenan D.R. Beliefs and the perception of risks and accidents. Risk Anal. 1998, 18:243-252.
40. Kouabenan D.R. Occupation, driving experience, and risk and accident perception. J. Risk Res. 2002, 5:49-68.
41. Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim. Change 2006, 77:45-72.
42. Lerner J.S., Keltner D. Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognit. Emot. 2000, 14:473-493.
43. Lerner J.S., Keltner D. Fear, anger, and risk. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2001, 81:146-159.
44. Luguri J.B., Napier J.L., Dovidio J.F. Reconstruing intolerance: abstract thinking reduces conservatives' prejudice against nonnormative groups. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 23:756-763. 10.1177/0956797611433877.
45. Lundell H., Niederdeppe J., Clarke C. Public views about health causation, attributions of responsibility, and inequality. J. Health Commun. 2013, 18:1116-1130. 10.1080/10810730.2013.768724.
46. Maibach E.W., Roser-Renouf C., Leiserowitz A. Communication and marketing as climate change intervention assets: a public health perspective. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2008, 35:488-500.
47. Maibach E.W., Nisbet M., Baldwin P., Akerlof K., Diao G. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:299-310. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-299.
48. Mannetti L., Pierro A. Health care workers' reactions to AIDS victims: perception of risk and attribution of responsibility. J. Commun. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1991, 1:133-142.
49. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the U.S. Global Environ. Change 2011, 21:1163-1172. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003.
50. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociol. Quart. 2011, 52:155-194.
51. Nisbet M.C. Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 2009, 51(2):12-23.
52. Olausson U. "We're the ones to blame": citizens' representations of climate change and the role of the media. Environ. Commun.: J. Nat. Culture 2011, 5:281-299. 10.1080/17524032.2011.585026.
53. O'Neill S., Boykoff M., Niemeyer S., Day S.A. On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environ. Change 2013, 23:413-421.
54. O'Neill S., Nicholson-Cole S. "Fear won't do it": promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci. Commun. 2009, 30:355-379.
55. Peltzer K., Renner W. Superstition, risk-taking, and risk perception of accidents among South African taxi drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2003, 35(4):619-623. 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00035-0.
56. Peterson R.A. On the use of college students in social science research: insights from a second-order meta-analysis. J. Consum. Res. 2001, 28:450-461.
57. Petts J. Health, responsibility, and choice: contrasting negotiations of air pollution and immunisation information. Environ. Plan. A 2005, 37(5):791-804. 10.1068/a3779.
58. Pidgeon N. Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy 2012, 12:S85-S106. 10.1080/14693062.2012.702982.
59. Pidgeon N., Fischhoff B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat. Climate Change 2011, 1:35-41. 10.1038/nclimate1080.
60. Posas P.J. Roles of religion and ethics in addressing climate change. Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit. 2007, 2007:31-49. 10.3354/esep00080.
61. Rickard L.N. Perception of risk and the attribution of responsibility for accidents. Risk Anal. 2013, 10.1111/risa.12118.
62. Rieh S.Y., Hilligoss B. College students' credibility judgments in the information-seeking process. Digital Media Youth, and Credibility 2008, 49-72. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.J. Metzger, A.J. Flanagin (Eds.).
63. Scannell L., Gifford R. Personally relevant climate change: the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environ. Behav. 2013, 45(1):60-85. 10.1177/0013916511421196.
64. Sellstrom E., Bremberg S., Garling A., Hornquist J.O. Risk of childhood injury: predictors of mothers' perceptions. Scand. J. Public Health 2000, 28(3):188-193. 10.1177/14034948000280030701.
65. Shaver K.G. The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility, and Blameworthiness 1985, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
66. Shove E. Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ. Plan. A 2010, 42:1273-1285. 10.1068/a42282.
67. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236(April (17)):280-285.
68. Spence A., Pidgeon N. Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environ. Change 2010, 20:656-667. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002.
69. Spence A., Poortinga W., Pidgeon N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal. 2012, 32(6):957-972. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x.
70. Stoddart M.C.J., Tindall D., Greenfield K.L. "Governments have the power"? Interpretations of climate change responsibility and solutions among Canadian environmentalists. Org. Environ. 2012, 25(1):39-58. 10.1177/1086026612436979.
71. Swim J.K., Stern P.C., Doherty T.J., Clayton S., Reser J.P., Weber E.U., Gifford R., Howard G.S. Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. Am. Psychol. 2011, 66(4):241-250. 10.1037/a0023220.
72. Taber C.S., Lodge M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 2006, 50:755-769.
73. Tangney J.P., Stuewig J., Mashek D.J. Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2007, 58:345-372. 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145.
74. ter Huurne E.F.J., Griffin R.J., Gutteling J.M. Risk information seeking among U.S. and Dutch residents. Sci. Commun. 2009, 31:215-237. 10.1177/1075547009332653.
75. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211(4481):453-458.
76. Weiner B. Social Motivation, Justice and the Moral Emotions: An Attributional Approach 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
77. Yang Z.J., Kahlor L. What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Sci. Commun. 2013, 35:189-212. 10.1177/1075547012441873.
78. Yang Z.J., Kahlor L., Li H. A U.S.-China comparison of risk information-seeking intentions. Commun. Res. 2013, 10.1177/0093650213479795.
79. Yang Z.J., McComas K.A., Gay G., Leonard J.P., Dannenberg A.J., Dillon H. From information processing to behavioral intentions: exploring cancer patients' motivations for clinical trial enrollment. Patient Educ. Couns. 2010, 79:231-238.
80. Yang Z.J., McComas K.A., Gay G., Leonard J.P., Dannenberg A.J., Dillon H. Motivation for health information seeking and processing about clinical trial enrollment. Health Commun. 2010, 25:423-436.
81. Yang Z.J., McComas K.A., Gay G., Leonard J.P., Dannenberg A.J., Dillon H. Information seeking related to clinical trial enrollment. Commun. Res. 2011, 38:856-882.
82. Yang Z.J., McComas K.A., Gay G., Leonard J.P., Dannenberg A.J., Dillon H. Comparing decision making between cancer patients and the general population: thoughts, emotions, or social influence?. J. Health Commun. 2012, 17:477-494. 10.1080/10810730.2011.635774.
83. Zhao X., Leiserowitz A., Maibach E.W., Roser-Renouf C. Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. J. Commun. 2011, 61:713-731. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01563.x.