Low fine tuning in the MSSM with higgsino dark matter and unification constraints

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Kowalska, Kamila ^a   Roszkowski, Leszek ^a   Sessolo, Enrico Maria ^a   Trojanowski, Sebastian ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTRE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH   (Poland)

Author keywords

Supersymmetry phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901418938     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2014)166     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235].
2. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214].
3. S. Akula, P. Nath and G. Peim, Implications of the Higgs boson discovery for mSUGRA, Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 188 [arXiv:1207.1839].
4. M.E. Cabrera, J.A. Casas and R.R. de Austri, The health of SUSY after the Higgs discovery and the XENON100 data, JHEP 07 (2013) 182 [arXiv:1212.4821].
5. K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski and E.M. Sessolo, Two ultimate tests of constrained supersymmetry, JHEP 06 (2013) 078 [arXiv:1302.5956].
6. J.L. Feng, P. Kant, S. Profumo and D. Sanford, Three-loop corrections to the Higgs boson mass and implications for supersymmetry at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 131802 [arXiv:1306.2318].
7. O. Buchmueller et al., The CMSSM and NUHM1 after LHC Run 1, arXiv:1312.5250.
8. M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY endures, JHEP 09 (2012) 035 [arXiv:1110.6926].
9. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126 GeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1112.2703].
10. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang and X. Tata, Natural supersymmetry: LHC, dark matter and ILC searches, JHEP 05 (2012) 109 [arXiv:1203.5539].
11. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail and T.G. Rizzo, The Higgs sector and fine-tuning in the pMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075015 [arXiv:1206.5800].
12. J.R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D.V. Nanopoulos and F. Zwirner, Observables in low-energy superstring models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1 (1986) 57.
13. R. Barbieri and G. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63.
14. G.G. Ross and R. Roberts, Minimal supersymmetric unification predictions, Nucl. Phys. B 377 (1992) 571.
15. B. de Carlos and J. Casas, One loop analysis of the electroweak breaking in supersymmetric models and the fine tuning problem, Phys. Lett. B 309 (1993) 320 [hep-ph/9303291].
16. G.W. Anderson and D.J. Castano, Measures of fine tuning, Phys. Lett. B 347 (1995) 300 [hep-ph/9409419].
17. G.W. Anderson and D.J. Castano, Naturalness and superpartner masses or when to give up on weak scale supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 1693 [hep-ph/9412322].
18. S. Dimopoulos and G. Giudice, Naturalness constraints in supersymmetric theories with nonuniversal soft terms, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 573 [hep-ph/9507282].
19. P.H. Chankowski, J.R. Ellis and S. Pokorski, The fine tuning price of LEP, Phys. Lett. B 423 (1998) 327 [hep-ph/9712234].
20. L. Giusti, A. Romanino and A. Strumia, Natural ranges of supersymmetric signals, Nucl. Phys. B 550 (1999) 3 [hep-ph/9811386].
21. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, About the fine tuning price of LEP, Phys. Lett. B 433 (1998) 63 [hep-ph/9801353].
22. D. Wright, Naturally nonminimal supersymmetry, hep-ph/9801449.
23. P.H. Chankowski, J.R. Ellis, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, Haggling over the fine tuning price of LEP, Nucl. Phys. B 544 (1999) 39 [hep-ph/9808275].
24. Z. Chacko, Y. Nomura and D. Tucker-Smith, A minimally fine-tuned supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 725 (2005) 207 [hep-ph/0504095].
25. K. Choi, K.S. Jeong, T. Kobayashi and K.-i. Okumura, Little SUSY hierarchy in mixed modulus-anomaly mediation, Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006) 355 [hep-ph/0508029].
26. K.L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Naturalness, weak scale supersymmetry and the prospect for the observation of supersymmetry at the Tevatron and at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 096004 [hep-ph/9710473].
27. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Multi-TeV scalars are natural in minimal supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2322 [hep-ph/9908309].
28. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Focus points and naturalness in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 075005 [hep-ph/9909334].
29. G.L. Kane and S. King, Naturalness implications of LEP results, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 113 [hep-ph/9810374].
30. M. Bastero-Gil, G.L. Kane and S. King, Fine tuning constraints on supergravity models, Phys. Lett. B 474 (2000) 103 [hep-ph/9910506].
31. G. Kane, J.D. Lykken, B.D. Nelson and L.-T. Wang, Reexamination of electroweak symmetry breaking in supersymmetry and implications for light superpartners, Phys. Lett. B 551 (2003) 146 [hep-ph/0207168].
32. H. Abe, T. Kobayashi and Y. Omura, Relaxed fine-tuning in models with non-universal gaugino masses, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 015002 [hep-ph/0703044].
33. D. Horton and G. Ross, Naturalness and focus points with non-universal gaugino masses, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 221 [arXiv:0908.0857].
34. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, A solution to the supersymmetric fine-tuning problem within the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 58 [hep-ph/0509039].
35. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, Supersymmetry, naturalness and signatures at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 095004 [hep-ph/0602096].
36. A.G. Cohen, D. Kaplan and A. Nelson, The more minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 588 [hep-ph/9607394].
37. P. Lodone, Supersymmetry phenomenology beyond the MSSM after 5/fb of LHC data, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 1230010 [arXiv:1203.6227].
38. H.M. Lee, V. Sanz and M. Trott, Hitting sbottom in natural SUSY, JHEP 05 (2012) 139 [arXiv:1204.0802].
39. J. Cao, C. Han, L. Wu, J.M. Yang and Y. Zhang, Probing natural SUSY from stop pair production at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2012) 039 [arXiv:1206.3865].
40. J.R. Espinosa, C. Grojean, V. Sanz and M. Trott, NSUSY fits, JHEP 12 (2012) 077 [arXiv:1207.7355].
41. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail and T.G. Rizzo, More energy, more searches, but the phenomenological MSSM lives on, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035002 [arXiv:1211.1981].
42. A. Chakraborty, D.K. Ghosh, D. Ghosh and D. Sengupta, Stop and sbottom search using dileptonic MT2 variable and boosted top technique at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2013) 122 [arXiv:1303.5776].
43. C. Boehm, P.S.B. Dev, A. Mazumdar and E. Pukartas, Naturalness of light neutralino dark matter in pMSSM after LHC, XENON100 and Planck data, JHEP 06 (2013) 113 [arXiv:1303.5386].
44. O. Buchmueller and J. Marrouche, Universal mass limits on gluino and third-generation squarks in the context of Natural-like SUSY spectra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1450032 [arXiv:1304.2185].
45. C. Han, K.-i. Hikasa, L. Wu, J.M. Yang and Y. Zhang, Current experimental bounds on stop mass in natural SUSY, JHEP 10 (2013) 216 [arXiv:1308.5307].
46. G.D. Kribs, A. Martin and A. Menon, Natural supersymmetry and implications for Higgs physics, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035025 [arXiv:1305.1313].
47. K. Kowalska and E.M. Sessolo, Natural MSSM after the LHC 8TeV run, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 075001 [arXiv:1307.5790].
48. M. Blanke, G.F. Giudice, P. Paradisi, G. Perez and J. Zupan, Flavoured naturalness, JHEP 06 (2013) 022 [arXiv:1302.7232].
49. M. Bastero-Gil, C. Hugonie, S. King, D. Roy and S. Vempati, Does LEP prefer the NMSSM, Phys. Lett. B 489 (2000) 359 [hep-ph/0006198].
50. A. Delgado, C. Kolda, J.P. Olson and A. de la Puente, Solving the little hierarchy problem with a singlet and explicit terms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 091802 [arXiv:1005.1282].
51. U. Ellwanger, G. Espitalier-Noel and C. Hugonie, Naturalness and fine tuning in the NMSSM: implications of early LHC results, JHEP 09 (2011) 105 [arXiv:1107.2472].
52. G.G. Ross and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, The fine-tuning of the generalised NMSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 862 (2012) 710 [arXiv:1108.1284].
53. G.G. Ross, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and F. Staub, The generalised NMSSM at one loop: fine tuning and phenomenology, JHEP 08 (2012) 074 [arXiv:1205.1509].
54. P. Athron, M. Binjonaid and S.F. King, Fine tuning in the constrained exceptional supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115023 [arXiv:1302.5291].
55. S. Antusch, L. Calibbi, V. Maurer, M. Monaco and M. Spinrath, Naturalness and GUT scale Yukawa coupling ratios in the CMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 035025 [arXiv:1111.6547].
56. S. Antusch, L. Calibbi, V. Maurer, M. Monaco and M. Spinrath, Naturalness of the non-universal MSSM in the light of the recent Higgs results, JHEP 01 (2013) 187 [arXiv:1207.7236].
57. H. Baer et al., Radiative natural supersymmetry: reconciling electroweak fine-tuning and the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115028 [arXiv:1212.2655].
58. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, A. Mustafayev and X. Tata, Radiative natural SUSY with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 161802 [arXiv:1207.3343].
59. H. Baer et al., Post-LHC7 fine-tuning in the mSUGRA/CMSSM model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 035017 [arXiv:1210.3019].
60. H. Baer et al., Radiatively-driven natural supersymmetry at the LHC, JHEP 12 (2013) 013 [arXiv:1310.4858].
61. H. Baer, V. Barger and M. Padeffke-Kirkland, Electroweak versus high scale finetuning in the 19-parameter SUGRA model, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055026 [arXiv:1304.6732].
62. H. Baer, V. Barger and D. Mickelson, How conventional measures overestimate electroweak fine-tuning in supersymmetric theory, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 095013 [arXiv:1309.2984].
63. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea and G. Ross, Fine tuning as an indication of physics beyond the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 825 (2010) 203 [arXiv:0903.1115].
64. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and D. Sanford, Focus point supersymmetry redux, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075007 [arXiv:1112.3021].
65. J.L. Feng and D. Sanford, A Natural 125 GeV Higgs boson in the MSSM from focus point supersymmetry with a-terms, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 055015 [arXiv:1205.2372].
66. I. Gogoladze, F. Nasir and Q. Shafi, Non-universal gaugino masses and natural supersymmetry, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1350046 [arXiv:1212.2593].
67. I. Gogoladze, F. Nasir and Q. Shafi, SO(10) as a framework for natural supersymmetry, JHEP 11 (2013) 173 [arXiv:1306.5699].
68. A. Kaminska, G.G. Ross and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Non-universal gaugino masses and fine tuning implications for SUSY searches in the MSSM and the GNMSSM, JHEP 11 (2013) 209 [arXiv:1308.4168].
69. A. Kaminska, G.G. Ross, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and F. Staub, A precision study of the fine tuning in the DiracNMSSM, arXiv:1401.1816.
70. V.E. Mayes, Universal soft terms in the MSSM on D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 877 (2013) 401 [arXiv:1305.2842].
71. F. Brummer and W. Buchmuller, A low Fermi scale from a simple gaugino-scalar mass relation, JHEP 03 (2014) 075 [arXiv:1311.1114].
72. P. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1303.5076.
73. K.-Y. Choi, J.E. Kim and L. Roszkowski, Review of axino dark matter, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 63 (2013) 1685 [arXiv:1307.3330].
74. L. Roszkowski, R. Ruiz de Austri, R. Trotta, Y.-L.S. Tsai and T.A. Varley, Global fits of the non-universal Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 015014 [arXiv:0903.1279].
75. S. Profumo and C.E. Yaguna, A statistical analysis of supersymmetric dark matter in the MSSM after WMAP, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 095004 [hep-ph/0407036].
76. A. Fowlie, K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Dark matter and collider signatures of the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055012 [arXiv:1306.1567].
77. G. Giudice and A. Masiero, A natural solution to the problem in supergravity theories, Phys. Lett. B 206 (1988) 480.
78. A. Masiero, D.V. Nanopoulos, K. Tamvakis and T. Yanagida, Naturally massless Higgs doublets in supersymmetric SU(5), Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 380.
79. B. Grinstein, A supersymmetric SU(5) gauge theory with no gauge hierarchy problem, Nucl. Phys. B 206 (1982) 387.
80. M. Cabrera, J. Casas and R. Ruiz de Austri, Bayesian approach and Naturalness in MSSM analyses for the LHC, JHEP 03 (2009) 075 [arXiv:0812.0536].
81. S. Fichet, Quantified naturalness from Bayesian statistics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 125029 [arXiv:1204.4940].
82. M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo and A. Strumia, A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests, JHEP 08 (2013) 022 [arXiv:1303.7244].
83. S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2282 [Erratum ibid. D 78 (2008) 039903] [hep-ph/9311340].
84. B. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145].
85. CMS collaboration, Combination of standard model Higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005 (2013).
86. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/rare/2012/radll/index.html.
87. I. Adachi et al., Evidence for B with a hadronic tagging method using the full data sample of Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 131801 [arXiv:1208.4678].
88. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001.
89. Measurement of the B0 s + branching fraction and search for B0 + decays at the LHCb experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 101805 [arXiv:1307.5024].
90. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the B0 s + branching fraction and search for B0 + with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 101804 [arXiv:1307.5025].
91. D. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, arXiv:1310.8214.
92. A. Fowlie, M. Kazana, K. Kowalska, S. Munir, L. Roszkowski et al., The CMSSM favoring new territories: the impact of new LHC limits and a 125 GeV Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1206.0264].
93. K. Kowalska et al., Constrained next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model with a 126 GeV Higgs boson: a global analysis, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115010 [arXiv:1211.1693].
94. F. Feroz, M. Hobson and M. Bridges, MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 398 (2009) 1601 [arXiv:0809.3437].
95. A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, SuperIso Relic: a program for calculating relic density and flavor physics observables in supersymmetry, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 1277 [arXiv:0906.0369].
96. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: a program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 367 [hep-ph/0607059].
97. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik and G. Weiglein, The masses of the neutral CP-even Higgs bosons in the MSSM: accurate analysis at the two loop level, Eur. Phys. J. C 9 (1999) 343 [hep-ph/9812472].
98. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik and G. Weiglein, FeynHiggs: a program for the calculation of the masses of the neutral CP even Higgs bosons in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 124 (2000) 76 [hep-ph/9812320].
99. G. Degrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, P. Slavich and G. Weiglein, Towards high precision predictions for the MSSM Higgs sector, Eur. Phys. J. C 28 (2003) 133 [hep-ph/0212020].
100. M. Frank et al., The Higgs boson masses and mixings of the complex MSSM in the Feynman-diagrammatic approach, JHEP 02 (2007) 047 [hep-ph/0611326].
101. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K.E. Williams, HiggsBounds: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 138 [arXiv:0811.4169].
102. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K.E. Williams, HiggsBounds 2.0.0: Confronting Neutral and Charged Higgs Sector Predictions with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2605 [arXiv:1102.1898].
103. P. Bechtle et al., HiggsBounds-4: improved tests of extended Higgs sectors against exclusion bounds from LEP, the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2693 [arXiv:1311.0055].
104. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein, HiggsSignals: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2711 [arXiv:1305.1933].
105. K. Cheung, Y.-L.S. Tsai, P.-Y. Tseng, T.-C. Yuan and A. Zee, Global study of the simplest scalar phantom dark matter model, JCAP 10 (2012) 042 [arXiv:1207.4930].
106. J.R. Ellis, T. Falk and K.A. Olive, Neutralino-stau coannihilation and the cosmological upper limit on the mass of the lightest supersymmetric particle, Phys. Lett. B 444 (1998) 367 [hep-ph/9810360].
107. J.R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, Gaugino masses and grand unification, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 381.
108. G. Anderson et al., Motivations for and implications of nonuniversal GUT scale boundary conditions for soft SUSY breaking parameters, eConf C 960625 (1996) SUP107 [hep-ph/9609457].
109. J.R. Ellis, C. Kounnas and D.V. Nanopoulos, No scale supersymmetric guts, Nucl. Phys. B 247 (1984) 373.
110. M. Drees, Phenomenological consequences of N = 1 supergravity theories with nonminimal kinetic energy terms for vector superfields, Phys. Lett. B 158 (1985) 409.
111. G.F. Giudice, M.A. Luty, H. Murayama and R. Rattazzi, Gaugino mass without singlets, JHEP 12 (1998) 027 [hep-ph/9810442].
112. H. Georgi and S. Glashow, Unity of all elementary particle forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438.
113. S.P. Martin, Non-universal gaugino masses from non-singlet F-terms in non-minimal unified models, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095019 [arXiv:0903.3568].
114. K. Griest and L. Roszkowski, Effect of relaxing grand unification assumptions on neutralinos in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 3309.
115. H. Baer, V. Barger and D. Mickelson, Direct and indirect detection of higgsino-like WIMPs: concluding the story of electroweak naturalness, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 330 [arXiv:1303.3816].
116. P. Schwaller and J. Zurita, Compressed electroweakino spectra at the LHC, JHEP 03 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1312.7350].
117. H. Baer, A. Mustafayev and X. Tata, Monojets and mono-photons from light higgsino pair production at LHC14, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 055007 [arXiv:1401.1162].
118. J.E. Kim and H.P. Nilles, The problem and the strong CP problem, Phys. Lett. B 138 (1984) 150.
119. L.J. Hall, J.D. Lykken and S. Weinberg, Supergravity as the messenger of supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2359.
120. S.K. Soni and H.A. Weldon, Analysis of the supersymmetry breaking induced by N = 1 supergravity theories, Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 215.
121. K. Choi, J.S. Lee and C. Munoz, Supergravity radiative effects on soft terms and the term, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 3686 [hep-ph/9709250].
122. D. Akerib et al., The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 704 (2013) 111 [arXiv:1211.3788].
123. E. Aprile, The XENON1T dark matter search experiment, arXiv:1206.6288.
124. G. Altarelli, F. Feruglio and I. Masina, From minimal to realistic supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification, JHEP 11 (2000) 040 [hep-ph/0007254].
125. Z. Berezhiani and Z. Tavartkiladze, Anomalous U(1) symmetry and missing doublet SU(5) model, Phys. Lett. B 396 (1997) 150 [hep-ph/9611277].
126. E. Witten, Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 188 (1981) 513.
127. W. Fischler, H.P. Nilles, J. Polchinski, S. Raby and L. Susskind, Vanishing renormalization of the D term in supersymmetric U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981) 757.
128. M. Dine, N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Fayet-Iliopoulos terms in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 289 (1987) 589.
129. J.J. Atick, L.J. Dixon and A. Sen, String calculation of Fayet-Iliopoulos d terms in arbitrary supersymmetric compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B 292 (1987) 109.
130. M. Dine, I. Ichinose and N. Seiberg, F terms and d terms in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 293 (1987) 253.
131. M. Fallbacher, M. Ratz and P.K. Vaudrevange, No-go theorems for R symmetries in four-dimensional GUTs, Phys. Lett. B 705 (2011) 503 [arXiv:1109.4797].
132. S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby and F. Wilczek, Proton decay in supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 112 (1982) 133.
133. J.R. Ellis, D.V. Nanopoulos and S. Rudaz, GUTs 3: SUSY GUTs 2, Nucl. Phys. B 202 (1982) 43.
134. N. Sakai and T. Yanagida, Proton decay in a class of supersymmetric grand unified models, Nucl. Phys. B 197 (1982) 533.
135. S. Weinberg, Supersymmetry at ordinary energies. 1. Masses and conservation laws, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 287.
136. J. Hisano, H. Murayama and T. Yanagida, Nucleon decay in the minimal supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification, Nucl. Phys. B 402 (1993) 46 [hep-ph/9207279].
137. N. Polonsky and A. Pomarol, Nonuniversal GUT corrections to the soft terms and their implications in supergravity models, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 6532 [hep-ph/9410231].
138. R.M. Fonseca, Calculating the renormalisation group equations of a SUSY model with Susyno, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2298 [arXiv:1106.5016].