Naturalness of the non-universal MSSM in the light of the recent Higgs results

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Antusch, Stefan ^a,b   Calibbi, Lorenzo ^b   Maurer, Vinzenz ^a   Monaco, Maurizio ^c   Spinrath, Martin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK   (Germany)

^c SEZIONE DI TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beyond standard model; GUT; Supersymmetric standard model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888768358     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2013)187     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. T. Corbett, O. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M. Gonzalez-Garcia, Constraining anomalous Higgs interactions, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075013 [arXiv:1207.1344] [INSPIRE].
4. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Is the resonance at 125 GeV the Higgs boson?, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 469 [arXiv:1207.1347] [INSPIRE].
5. J. Ellis and T. You, Global Analysis of the Higgs Candidate with Mass ∼ 125 GeV, JHEP 09 (2012) 123 [arXiv:1207.1693] [INSPIRE].
6. M. Montull and F. Riva, Higgs discovery: the beginning or the end of natural EWSB?, JHEP 11 (2012) 018 [arXiv:1207.1716] [INSPIRE].
7. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, First Glimpses at Higgs' face, JHEP 12 (2012) 045 [arXiv:1207.1717] [INSPIRE].
8. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, Higgs After the Discovery: A Status Report, JHEP 10 (2012) 196 [arXiv:1207.1718] [INSPIRE].
9. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [arXiv:1112.3028] [INSPIRE].
10. CMS collaboration, Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with a Z boson, jets and missing transverse energy in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 260 [arXiv:1204.3774] [INSPIRE].
11. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in √s = 7 TeV proton-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 67 [arXiv:1109.6572] [INSPIRE].
12. ATLAS collaboration, Search for gluinos in events with two same-sign leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 241802 [arXiv:1203.5763] [INSPIRE].
13. - jets with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 112006 [arXiv:1203.6193] [INSPIRE].
14. ATLAS collaboration, Search for scalar bottom pair production with the ATLAS detector in pp Collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 181802 [arXiv:1112.3832] [INSPIRE].
15. A.H. Chamseddine, R.L. Arnowitt and P. Nath, Locally Supersymmetric Grand Unification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 970 [INSPIRE].
16. R. Barbieri, S. Ferrara and C.A. Savoy, Gauge Models with Spontaneously Broken Local Supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 119 (1982) 343 [INSPIRE].
17. L.E. Ibáñez, Locally Supersymmetric SU(5) Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 118 (1982) 73 [INSPIRE].
18. L.J. Hall, J.D. Lykken and S. Weinberg, Supergravity as the Messenger of Supersymmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2359 [INSPIRE].
19. N. Ohta, Grand unified theories based on local supersymmetry, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70 (1983) 542 [INSPIRE].
20. S. Antusch, L. Calibbi, V. Maurer, M. Monaco and M. Spinrath, Naturalness and GUT Scale Yukawa Coupling Ratios in the CMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 035025 [arXiv:1111.6547] [INSPIRE].
21. H. Abe, T. Kobayashi and Y. Omura, Relaxed fine-tuning in models with non-universal gaugino masses, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 015002 [hep-ph/0703044] [INSPIRE].
22. R, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 105002 [arXiv:0907.0728] [INSPIRE].
23. D. Horton and G. Ross, Naturalness and Focus Points with Non-Universal Gaugino Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 221 [arXiv:0908.0857] [INSPIRE].
24. D.M. Ghilencea, H.M. Lee and M. Park, Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level, JHEP 07 (2012) 046 [arXiv:1203.0569] [INSPIRE].
25. F. Brummer and W. Buchmüller, The Fermi scale as a focus point of high-scale gauge mediation, JHEP 05 (2012) 006 [arXiv:1201.4338] [INSPIRE].
26. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A Natural SUSY Higgs Near 126 GeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1112.2703] [INSPIRE].
27. A. Arvanitaki and G. Villadoro, A Non Standard Model Higgs at the LHC as a Sign of Naturalness, JHEP 02 (2012) 144 [arXiv:1112.4835] [INSPIRE].
28. Z. Kang, J. Li and T. Li, On Naturalness of the MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 11 (2012) 024 [arXiv:1201.5305] [INSPIRE].
29. M. Asano and T. Higaki, Natural supersymmetric spectrum in mirage mediation, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 035020 [arXiv:1204.0508] [INSPIRE].
30. H.M. Lee, V. Sanz and M. Trott, Hitting sbottom in natural SUSY, JHEP 05 (2012) 139 [arXiv:1204.0802] [INSPIRE].
31. J.L. Feng and D. Sanford, A Natural 125 GeV Higgs Boson in the MSSM from Focus Point Supersymmetry with A-Terms, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 055015 [arXiv:1205.2372] [INSPIRE].
32. K. Blum, R.T. D'Agnolo and J. Fan, Natural SUSY Predicts: Higgs Couplings, JHEP 01 (2013) 057 [arXiv:1206.5303] [INSPIRE].
33. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail and T.G. Rizzo, The Higgs Sector and Fine-Tuning in the pMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075015 [arXiv:1206.5800] [INSPIRE].
34. L. Randall and M. Reece, Single-Scale Natural SUSY, arXiv:1206.6540 [INSPIRE].
35. B. Kyae and J.-C. Park, A Singlet-Extension of the MSSM for 125 GeV Higgs with the Least Tuning, arXiv:1207.3126 [INSPIRE].
36. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, A. Mustafayev and X. Tata, Radiative natural SUSY with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 161802 [arXiv:1207.3343] [INSPIRE].
37. P. Grothaus, M. Lindner and Y. Takanishi, Naturalness of Neutralino Dark Matter, arXiv:1207.4434 [INSPIRE].
38. M. Passera, W. Marciano and A. Sirlin, The Muon g - 2 and the bounds on the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013009 [arXiv:0804.1142] [INSPIRE].
39. 2) re-evaluated using new precise data, J. Phys. G 38 (2011) 085003 [arXiv:1105.3149] [INSPIRE].
40. R. Barbieri and G. Giudice, Upper Bounds on Supersymmetric Particle Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63 [INSPIRE].
41. M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY Endures, JHEP 09 (2012) 035 [arXiv:1110.6926] [INSPIRE].
42. B. de Carlos and J. Casas, One loop analysis of the electroweak breaking in supersymmetric models and the fine tuning problem, Phys. Lett. B 309 (1993) 320 [hep-ph/9303291] [INSPIRE].
43. L. Giusti, A. Romanino and A. Strumia, Natural ranges of supersymmetric signals, Nucl. Phys. B 550 (1999) 3 [hep-ph/9811386] [INSPIRE].
44. A. Romanino and A. Strumia, Are heavy scalars natural in minimal supergravity?, Phys. Lett. B 487 (2000) 165 [hep-ph/9912301] [INSPIRE].
45. J.L. Feng and K.T. Matchev, Focus point supersymmetry: Proton decay, flavor and CP-violation and the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 095003 [hep-ph/0011356] [INSPIRE].
46. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [INSPIRE].
47. MSSM Working Group collaboration, A. Djouadi et al., The Minimal supersymmetric standard model: Group summary report, hep-ph/9901246 [INSPIRE].
48. S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2282 [Erratum ibid. D 78 (2008) 039903] [hep-ph/9311340] [INSPIRE].
49. -, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 231801 [arXiv:1203.4493] [INSPIRE].
50. B. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145] [INSPIRE].
51. K.L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Naturalness, weak scale supersymmetry and the prospect for the observation of supersymmetry at the Tevatron and at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 096004 [hep-ph/9710473] [INSPIRE].
52. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Multi - TeV scalars are natural in minimal supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2322 [hep-ph/9908309] [INSPIRE].
53. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Focus points and naturalness in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 075005 [hep-ph/9909334] [INSPIRE].
54. S. Akula, M. Liu, P. Nath and G. Peim, Naturalness, Supersymmetry and Implications for LHC and Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 192 [arXiv:1111.4589] [INSPIRE].
55. S. Akula, B. Altunkaynak, D. Feldman, P. Nath and G. Peim, Higgs Boson Mass Predictions in SUGRA Unification, Recent LHC-7 Results and Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075001 [arXiv:1112.3645] [INSPIRE].
56. -1 of Data, arXiv:1007.3178 [INSPIRE].
57. H. Georgi and S. Glashow, Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438 [INSPIRE].
58. J.C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton Number as the Fourth Color, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 275 [Erratum ibid. D 11 (1975) 703] [INSPIRE].
59. H. Georgi, The State of the Art - Gauge Theories. (Talk), AIP Conf. Proc. 23 (1975) 575.
60. H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons, Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 193 [INSPIRE].
61. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia and F. Mahmoudi, Implications of LHC Searches on SUSY Particle Spectra: The pMSSM Parameter Space with Neutralino Dark Matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1847 [arXiv:1110.3726] [INSPIRE].
62. H.K. Dreiner, M. Krämer and J. Tattersall, How low can SUSY go? Matching, monojets and compressed spectra, Europhys. Lett. 99 (2012) 61001 [arXiv:1207.1613 ] [INSPIRE].
63. S. Antusch, L. Calibbi, V. Maurer and M. Spinrath, From Flavour to SUSY Flavour Models, Nucl. Phys. B 852 (2011) 108 [arXiv:1104.3040] [INSPIRE].
64. S. Antusch and M. Spinrath, New GUT predictions for quark and lepton mass ratios confronted with phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095004 [arXiv:0902.4644] [INSPIRE].
65. L.J. Hall, R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid, The Top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7048 [hep-ph/9306309] [INSPIRE].
66. M.S. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski and C. Wagner, Electroweak symmetry breaking and bottom-top Yukawa unification, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 269 [hep-ph/9402253] [INSPIRE].
67. R. Hempfling, Yukawa coupling unification with supersymmetric threshold corrections, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6168 [INSPIRE].
68. T. Blazek, S. Raby and S. Pokorski, Finite supersymmetric threshold corrections to CKM matrix elements in the large tan Beta regime, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 4151 [hep-ph/9504364] [INSPIRE].
69. - revisited, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 014016 [hep-ph/0702267] [INSPIRE].
70. S. Antusch and M. Spinrath, Quark and lepton masses at the GUT scale including SUSY threshold corrections, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 075020 [arXiv:0804.0717] [INSPIRE].
71. M. Spinrath, New Aspects of Flavour Model Building in Supersymmetric Grand Unification, arXiv:1009.2511 [INSPIRE].
72. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea and G. Ross, Fine tuning as an indication of physics beyond the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 825 (2010) 203 [arXiv:0903.1115] [INSPIRE].
73. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea and G. Ross, Testing SUSY, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 214 [arXiv:0911.1134] [INSPIRE].
74. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea and G. Ross, Testing SUSY at the LHC: Electroweak and Dark matter fine tuning at two-loop order, Nucl. Phys. B 835 (2010) 110 [arXiv:1001.3884] [INSPIRE].
75. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea, S. Kraml, A. Lessa and G. Ross, Fine-tuning implications for complementary dark matter and LHC SUSY searches, JHEP 05 (2011) 120 [arXiv:1101.4664] [INSPIRE].
76. F. Mahmoudi, SuperIso: A Program for calculating the isospin asymmetry of B → K*γ in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 745 [arXiv:0710.2067] [INSPIRE].
77. F. Mahmoudi, SuperIso v2.3: A Program for calculating flavor physics observables in Supersymmetry, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1579 [arXiv:0808.3144] [INSPIRE].
78. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, D. Asner et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ-lepton Properties, arXiv:1010.1589 [INSPIRE].
79. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, E. Barberio et al., Averages of b-hadron and c-hadron Properties at the End of 2007, arXiv:0808.1297 [INSPIRE].
80. J-PARC g-2 collaboration, T. Mibe, New g - 2 experiment at J-PARC, Chin. Phys. C 34 (2010) 745 [INSPIRE].
81. R.M. Carey et al., The New (g - 2) Experiment: A proposal to measure the muon anomalous magnetic moment to ±0:14 ppm precision, FERMILAB-PROPOSAL-0989.
82. BABAR collaboration, J. Lees et al., Evidence of B → τν decays with hadronic B tags, arXiv:1207.0698 [INSPIRE].
83. J. Alwall, P. Schuster and N. Toro, Simplified Models for a First Characterization of New Physics at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 075020 [arXiv:0810.3921] [INSPIRE].
84. D.S. Alves, E. Izaguirre and J.G. Wacker, Where the Sidewalk Ends: Jets and Missing Energy Search Strategies for the 7 TeV LHC, JHEP 10 (2011) 012 [arXiv:1102.5338] [INSPIRE].
85. LHC New Physics Working Group collaboration, D. Alves et al., Simplified Models for LHC New Physics Searches, J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 105005 [arXiv:1105.2838] [INSPIRE].
86. J. Chakrabortty and A. Raychaudhuri, A Note on dimension-5 operators in GUTs and their impact, Phys. Lett. B 673 (2009) 57 [arXiv:0812.2783] [INSPIRE].
87. S.P. Martin, Non-universal gaugino masses from non-singlet F-terms in non-minimal unified models, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095019 [arXiv:0903.3568] [INSPIRE].
88. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi and F. Mahmoudi, The Higgs sector of the phenomenological MSSM in the light of the Higgs boson discovery, JHEP 09 (2012) 107 [arXiv:1207.1348] [INSPIRE].
89. A. Brignole, L.E. Ibáñez and C. Muñoz, Towards a theory of soft terms for the supersymmetric Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 422 (1994) 125 [Erratum ibid. B 436 (1995) 747] [hep-ph/9308271] [INSPIRE].