Natural supersymmetry: LHC, dark matter and ILC searches

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Baer, Howard ^a   Barger, Vernon ^b   Huang, Peisi ^b   Tata, Xerxes ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Supersymmetry phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861800127     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2012)109     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981) 150 [INSPIRE].
2. N. Sakai, Naturalness in supersymmetric guts, Z. Phys. C 11 (1981) 153 [INSPIRE].
3. H. Baer and X. Tata, Weak scale supersymmetry: from superfields to scattering events, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2006).
4. M. Drees, R. Godbole and P. Roy, Theory and phenomenology of sparticles, World Scientific, Singapore (2004).
5. P. Binetruy, Supersymmetry, Oxford University Press, Oxford U.K. (2006).
6. S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356 [INSPIRE].
7. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for supersymmetry at the LHC in events with jets and missing transverse energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 221804 [arXiv:1109.2352] [INSPIRE].
8. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in √s = 7TeV proton-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 67 [arXiv:1109.6572] [INSPIRE].
9. S. Lowette, SUSY searches in LHC, talk at Rencontres de Moriond, March 3-10, La Thuile, Aosta Valley, Italy (2012).
10. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [arXiv:1112.3028] [INSPIRE].
11. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Neutralino dark matter in mSUGRA/CMSSM with a 125 GeV light Higgs scalar, arXiv:1202.4038 [INSPIRE].
12. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for LHC SUSY and neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1112.3017] [INSPIRE].
13. V.S. Kaplunovsky and J. Louis, Model independent analysis of soft terms in effective supergravity and in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 306 (1993) 269 [hep-th/9303040] [INSPIRE].
14. N. Arkani-Hamed and H. Murayama, Can the supersymmetric flavor problem decouple?, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 6733 [hep-ph/9703259] [INSPIRE].
15. Y. Nomura, M. Papucci and D. Stolarski, Flavorful supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 075006 [arXiv:0712.2074] [INSPIRE].
16. M. Redi and B. Gripaios, Partially supersymmetric composite Higgs models, JHEP 08 (2010) 116 [arXiv:1004.5114] [INSPIRE].
17. R. Barbieri, E. Bertuzzo, M. Farina, P. Lodone and D. Zhuridov, Minimal flavour violation with hierarchical squark masses, JHEP 12 (2010) 070 [Erratum ibid. 1102 (2011) 044] [arXiv:1011.0730] [INSPIRE].
18. F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero and L. Silvestrini, A complete analysis of FCNC and CP constraints in general SUSY extensions of the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 321 [hep-ph/9604387] [INSPIRE].
19. M. Dine, A. Kagan and S. Samuel, Naturalness in supersymmetry, or raising the supersymmetry breaking scale, Phys. Lett. B 243 (1990) 250 [INSPIRE].
20. A.G. Cohen, D. Kaplan and A. Nelson, The more minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 588 [hep-ph/9607394] [INSPIRE].
21. H. Baer, S. Kraml, A. Lessa, S. Sekmen and X. Tata, Effective supersymmetry at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2010) 018 [arXiv:1007.3897] [INSPIRE].
22. D. Feldman, G. Kane, E. Kuflik and R. Lu, A new (string motivated) approach to the little hierarchy problem, Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 56 [arXiv:1105.3765] [INSPIRE].
23. R.L. Arnowitt and P. Nath, Loop corrections to radiative breaking of electroweak symmetry in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 3981 [INSPIRE].
24. K.L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Naturalness, weak scale supersymmetry and the prospect for the observation of supersymmetry at the Tevatron and at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 096004 [hep-ph/9710473] [INSPIRE].
25. R. Barbieri and G. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63 [INSPIRE].
26. S. Dimopoulos and G. Giudice, Naturalness constraints in supersymmetric theories with nonuniversal soft terms, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 573 [hep-ph/9507282] [INSPIRE].
27. N. Arkani-Hamed, Natural SUSY: stops, sbottoms, gluinos and friends, talk at WG2 meeting, October 31, CERN, Geneva (2012).
28. C. Brust, A. Katz, S. Lawrence and R. Sundrum, SUSY, the third generation and the LHC, JHEP 03 (2012) 103 [arXiv:1110.6670] [INSPIRE].
29. R. Essig, E. Izaguirre, J. Kaplan and J.G. Wacker, Heavy flavor simplified models at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2012) 074 [arXiv:1110.6443] [INSPIRE].
30. M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY endures, arXiv:1110.6926 [INSPIRE].
31. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126 GeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1112.2703] [INSPIRE].
32. S. King, M. Muhlleitner and R. Nevzorov, NMSSM Higgs benchmarks near 125 GeV, Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 207 [arXiv:1201.2671] [INSPIRE].
33. C. Csáki, L. Randall and J. Terning, Light stops from Seiberg duality, arXiv:1201.1293 [INSPIRE].
34. G. Larsen, Y. Nomura and H.L. Roberts, Supersymmetry with light stops, arXiv:1202.6339 [INSPIRE].
35. H. Baer, S. Kraml, S. Sekmen and H. Summy, Dark matter allowed scenarios for Yukawa-unified SO(10) SUSY GUTs, JHEP 03 (2008) 056 [arXiv:0801.1831] [INSPIRE].
36. S. Weinberg, Cosmological constraints on the scale of supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1303 [INSPIRE].
37. M.Y. Khlopov and A.D. Linde, Is it easy to save the gravitino?, Phys. Lett. B 138 (1984) 265 [INSPIRE].
38. M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, T. Moroi and A. Yotsuyanagi, Big-bang nucleosynthesis and gravitino, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 065011 [arXiv:0804.3745] [INSPIRE].
39. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, A solution to the supersymmetric fine-tuning problem within the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 58 [hep-ph/0509039] [INSPIRE].
40. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, Supersymmetry, naturalness and signatures at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 095004 [hep-ph/0602096] [INSPIRE].
41. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, Supersymmetry with small μ: connections between naturalness, dark matter and (possibly) flavor, hep-ph/0606134 [INSPIRE].
42. H. Baer, V. Barger and P. Huang, Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world scenario and the role of a lepton collider, JHEP 11 (2011) 031 [arXiv:1107.5581] [INSPIRE].
43. P. Moxhay and K. Yamamoto, Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking by radiative corrections in supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 151 (1985) 363 [INSPIRE].
44. E. Chun and A. Lukas, Axino mass in supergravity models, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 43 [hep-ph/9503233] [INSPIRE].
45. C. Cheung, G. Elor and L.J. Hall, The cosmological axino problem, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 015008 [arXiv:1104.0692] [INSPIRE].
46. K.-Y. Choi, J.E. Kim, H.M. Lee and O. Seto, Neutralino dark matter from heavy axino decay, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 123501 [arXiv:0801.0491] [INSPIRE].
47. H. Baer, A. Lessa, S. Rajagopalan and W. Sreethawong, Mixed axion/neutralino cold dark matter in supersymmetric models, JCAP 06 (2011) 031 [arXiv:1103.5413] [INSPIRE].
48. H. Baer, A. Lessa and W. Sreethawong, Coupled Boltzmann calculation of mixed axion/neutralino cold dark matter production in the early universe, JCAP 01 (2012) 036 [arXiv:1110.2491] [INSPIRE].
49. J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive and Y. Santoso, The MSSM parameter space with nonuniversal Higgs masses, Phys. Lett. B 539 (2002) 107 [hep-ph/0204192] [INSPIRE].
50. J.R. Ellis, T. Falk, K.A. Olive and Y. Santoso, Exploration of the MSSM with nonuniversal Higgs masses, Nucl. Phys. B 652 (2003) 259 [hep-ph/0210205] [INSPIRE].
51. H. Baer, A. Mustafayev, S. Profumo, A. Belyaev and X. Tata, Neutralino cold dark matter in a one parameter extension of the minimal supergravity model, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 095008 [hep-ph/0412059] [INSPIRE].
52. H. Baer, A. Mustafayev, S. Profumo, A. Belyaev and X. Tata, Charges of exceptionally twisted branes, JHEP 07 (2005) 065 [hep-th/0504006] [INSPIRE].
53. H. Baer, A. Belyaev, T. Krupovnickas and A. Mustafayev, SUSY normal scalar mass hierarchy reconciles (g - 2)(μ), b → s and relic density, JHEP 06 (2004) 044 [hep-ph/0403214] [INSPIRE].
54. - reactions, hep-ph/0312045 [INSPIRE].
55. - colliders, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1046 [hep-ph/9408265] [INSPIRE].
56. H. Baer, J. Ferrandis, S. Kraml and W. Porod, On the treatment of threshold effects in SUSY spectrum computations, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 015010 [hep-ph/0511123] [INSPIRE].
57. J. Hisano, H. Murayama and T. Yanagida, Nucleon decay in the minimal supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification, Nucl. Phys. B 402 (1993) 46 [hep-ph/9207279] [INSPIRE].
58. Y. Yamada, SUSY and GUT threshold effects in SUSY SU(5) models, Z. Phys. C 60 (1993) 83 [INSPIRE].
59. J. Chkareuli and I. Gogoladze, Unification picture in minimal supersymmetric SU(5) model with string remnants, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 055011 [hep-ph/9803335] [INSPIRE].
60. S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2282 [Erratum ibid. D 78 (2008) 039903] [hep-ph/9311340] [INSPIRE].
61. H.E. Haber and R. Hempfling, The renormalization group improved Higgs sector of the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4280 [hep-ph/9307201] [INSPIRE].
62. D.M. Pierce, J.A. Bagger, K.T. Matchev and R.-j. Zhang, Precision corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 491 (1997) 3 [hep-ph/9606211] [INSPIRE].
63. Joint LEP 2 Supersymmetry working group, Combined LEP chargino results up to 208GeV, http://lepsusy.web.cern.ch/lepsusy/www/inos-moriond01/charginos-pub. html.
64. H. Baer, C. Balázs, P. Mercadante, X. Tata and Y. Wang, Viable supersymmetric models with an inverted scalar mass hierarchy at the GUT scale, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 015011 [hep-ph/0008061] [INSPIRE].
65. -1 of pp collision data at √s = 7TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 49 [arXiv:1202.1408] [INSPIRE].
66. S. Kortner, Results from ATLAS, talk at Rencontres de Moriond, March 3-10, La Thuile, Aosta Valley, Italy (2012).
67. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [arXiv:1202.1488] [INSPIRE].
68. M. Pieri, Results form CMS, talk at Rencontres de Moriond, March 3-10, La Thuile, Aosta Valley, Italy (2012).
69. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah and C.E. Wagner, A 125 GeV SM-like Higgs in the MSSM and the γ γ rate, JHEP 03 (2012) 014 [arXiv:1112.3336] [INSPIRE].
70. H. Baer, M. Brhlik, C.-h. Chen and X. Tata, Signals for the minimal gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking model at the Fermilab Tevatron collider, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 4463 [hep-ph/9610358] [INSPIRE].
71. H. Baer, M. Brhlik, D. Castano and X. Tata, b → s γ gconstraints on the minimal supergravity model with large tanß, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 015007 [hep-ph/9712305] [INSPIRE].
72. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, D. Asner et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ -lepton Properties, arXiv:1010.1589 [INSPIRE].
73. Muon (G-2) collaboration, G. Bennett et al., An improved limit on the muon electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 052008 [arXiv:0811.1207] [INSPIRE].
74. K. Cheung, C.-W. Chiang and J. Song, A minimal supersymmetric scenario with only μ at the weak scale, JHEP 04 (2006) 047 [hep-ph/0512192] [INSPIRE].
75. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker and M. Spira, PROSPINO: a program for the production of supersymmetric particles in next-to-leading order QCD, hep-ph/9611232 [INSPIRE].
76. -1, JHEP 06 (2010) 102 [arXiv:1004.3594] [INSPIRE].
77. -1, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 051701 [arXiv:1112.3044] [INSPIRE].
78. H. Baer, X. Tata and J. Woodside, Multi-lepton signals from supersymmetry at hadron super colliders, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 142 [INSPIRE].
79. H. Baer, C.-h. Chen, F. Paige and X. Tata, Signals for minimal supergravity at the CERN Large Hadron Collider: multi-jet plus missing energy channel, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 2746 [hep-ph/9503271] [INSPIRE].
80. H. Baer, C.-h. Chen, F. Paige and X. Tata, Signals for minimal supergravity at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. 2: multi-lepton channels, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 6241 [hep-ph/9512383] [INSPIRE].
81. H. Baer, C.-h. Chen, M. Drees, F. Paige and X. Tata, Probing minimal supergravity at the CERN LHC for large tanß, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 055014 [hep-ph/9809223] [INSPIRE].
82. H. Baer, C. Balázs, A. Belyaev, T. Krupovnickas and X. Tata, Updated reach of the CERN LHC and constraints from relic density, b → s γ and a(μ) in the mSUGRA model, JHEP 06 (2003) 054 [hep-ph/0304303] [INSPIRE].
83. H. Baer, V. Barger, A. Lessa and X. Tata, Supersymmetry discovery potential of the LHC at √s = 10TeV and 14TeV without and with missing E(T), JHEP 09 (2009) 063 [arXiv:0907.1922] [INSPIRE].
84. miss final states, Nucl. Phys. B 547 (1999) 60 [hep-ph/9811402] [INSPIRE].
85. CMS collaboration, S. Abdullin et al., Discovery potential for supersymmetry in CMS, J. Phys. G 28 (2002) 469 [hep-ph/9806366] [INSPIRE].
86. B. Allanach, J. Hetherington, M.A. Parker and B. Webber, Naturalness reach of the Large Hadron Collider in minimal supergravity, JHEP 08 (2000) 017 [hep-ph/0005186] [INSPIRE].
87. U. Chattopadhyay, A. Datta, A. Datta, A. Datta and D. Roy, LHC signature of the minimal SUGRA model with a large soft scalar mass, Phys. Lett. B 493 (2000) 127 [hep-ph/0008228] [INSPIRE].
88. P. Mercadante, J. Mizukoshi and X. Tata, Using b-tagging to enhance the SUSY reach of the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 035009 [hep-ph/0506142] [INSPIRE].
89. S.P. Das, A. Datta, M. Guchait, M. Maity and S. Mukherjee, Focus point SUSY at the LHC revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 54 (2008) 645 [arXiv:0708.2048] [INSPIRE].
90. R. Kadala, P. Mercadante, J. Mizukoshi and X. Tata, Heavy-flavour tagging and the supersymmetry reach of the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 56 (2008) 511 [arXiv:0803.0001] [INSPIRE].
91. A. Marzin, Searches for 3rd generation SUSY in ATLAS, talk at Rencontres de Moriond, March 3-10, La Thuile, Aosta Valley, Italy (2012).
92. H. Baer, A. Belyaev, T. Krupovnickas and X. Tata, Linear collider capabilities for supersymmetry in dark matter allowed regions of the mSUGRA model, JHEP 02 (2004) 007 [hep-ph/0311351] [INSPIRE].
93. H. Baer, T. Krupovnickas and X. Tata, Two photon background and the reach of a linear collider for supersymmetry in WMAP favored coannihilation regions, JHEP 06 (2004) 061 [hep-ph/0405058] [INSPIRE].
94. T. Moroi and L. Randall, Wino cold dark matter from anomaly mediated SUSY breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 570 (2000) 455 [hep-ph/9906527] [INSPIRE].
95. G.B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo, Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any supersymmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 023510 [hep-ph/0602230] [INSPIRE].
96. G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, A. Soldatenko and C.E. Yaguna, The effect of a late decaying scalar on the neutralino relic density, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 083514 [hep-ph/0605016] [INSPIRE].
97. G.B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, A. Soldatenko and C. Yaguna, Direct detection of neutralino dark mattter in non-standard cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 015010 [hep-ph/0610379] [INSPIRE].
98. B.S. Acharya, K. Bobkov, G.L. Kane, P. Kumar and J. Shao, Explaining the electroweak scale and stabilizing moduli in M-theory, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 126010 [hep-th/0701034] [INSPIRE].
99. 2-MSSM: an M-theory motivated model of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 065038 [arXiv:0801.0478] [INSPIRE].
100. B.S. Acharya et al., Non-thermal dark matter and the moduli problem in string frameworks, JHEP 06 (2008) 064 [arXiv:0804.0863] [INSPIRE].
101. H. Baer, C. Balázs, A. Belyaev and J. O'Farrill, Direct detection of dark matter in supersymmetric models, JCAP 09 (2003) 007 [hep-ph/0305191] [INSPIRE].
102. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 131302 [arXiv:1104.2549] [INSPIRE].
103. IceCube collaboration, R. Abbasi et al., Multi-year search for dark matter annihilations in the Sun with the AMANDA-II and IceCube detectors, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 042002 [arXiv:1112.1840] [INSPIRE].
104. E. Behnke et al., Improved limits on spin-dependent WIMP-proton interactions from a two liter CF3I bubble chamber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 021303 [arXiv:1008.3518] [INSPIRE].
105. COUPP collaboration, W.H. Lippincott, Searching for dark matter with COUPP, talk at International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics, September 5-9, Munich, Germany (2011).
106. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Constraining dark matter models from a combined analysis of Milky Way satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 241302 [arXiv:1108.3546] [INSPIRE].
107. A. Geringer-Sameth and S.M. Koushiappas, Exclusion of canonical WIMPs by the joint analysis of Milky Way dwarfs with Fermi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 241303 [arXiv:1108.2914] [INSPIRE].