Dynamics of community engagement: The role of interpersonal communicative genres in online community evolutions

Research in Consumer Behavior

Volumn 11, Issue , 2007, Pages 371-400

  Alon, Anat Toder ^a   Brunel, Frédéric F ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901399674     PISSN: 08852111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0885-2111(06)11015-7     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19-34. (Pubitemid 41017925)
2. Arnould, E., & Price, L. L. (1993). River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(June), 24-45.
3. Arnould, E., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(March), 868-882. (Pubitemid 40517894)
4. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.
5. Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the concept of intentional social action in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 388-396.
6. Bales, R. F. (1951). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley Press, Inc.
7. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
8. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 139-168.
9. Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B., & Rainie L. (2006). The strength of Internet ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American life project.
10. Bormann, E. (1996). Symbolic convergence theory and communication in group decision making. In: R. Hirokawa & M. Poole (Eds), Communication and group decision making, (2nd ed.) (pp. 81-113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Brent, S. (1984). Psychological and social structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Briley, D. A., & Wyer, R. S. (2002). The effects of group membership on the avoidance of negative outcomes: Implications for social and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(December), 400-415.
13. Callan, V. J. (1993). Individual and organizational strategies for coping with organizational change. Work and Stress, 7(1), 63-75. (Pubitemid 23123727)
14. Cissna, K. (1984). Phases of group development. Small Group Behavior, 15(1), 3-32.
15. Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2002). Tribal marketing - The tribalization of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5-6), 596-620.
16. Erickson, T. (1997). Social interaction on the net: Virtual community as participatory genre. In: R. H. Sprague Jr. (Ed.), The proceedings of the thirtieth annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 13-21). CA: IEEE Press.
17. Erickson, T. (2000). Making sense of computer-mediated communication (CMC): Conversations as genres, CMC systems as genre ecologies. In: J. F. Nunamaker Jr. & R. H. Sprague Jr. (Eds.), The proceedings of the thirty-third Hawaii international conference on systems science (Vol. 2, pp., 1-10). CA: IEEE Press.
18. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Green, H. (2006). It takes a web village: Private online communities are providing special Insights Into Customers' Needs. Business Week Sep 4.
20. Hagel, J., III, & Armstrong, A. G. (1997). Net gains: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
21. Healy, D. (1996). Cyberspace and place: The Internet as middle landscape on the electronic frontier. In: D. Porter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp. 55-68). New York: Routledge Inc.
22. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic wordof- mouth via consumers-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 38-52. (Pubitemid 38582736)
23. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1998). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London and New York: Routledge.
24. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
25. Keyton, J. (1999). Relational communication in groups. In: L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran & M. S. Poole (Eds), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 192-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized marketing?: The strategic implications of virtual communities on consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), 252-264.
27. Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-73.
28. Lacoursiere, R. B. (1980). The life cycle of groups: Group development stage theory. NY: Human Science Press.
29. Lerman, K., & Austin, M. (2006). What companies gain from listening: The effect of community membership on member's attitudes and behavior in relation to the sponsoring company, White Paper, Communispace Corporation.
30. Levinger, G. (1983). Development and change. In: H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. Harvey, T. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau & D. Peterson (Eds), Close relationships (pp. 315-359). New York: Freeman.
31. Madden, K. M. (2006). Internet penetration and impact. Pew Internet & American life project, Washington, DC.
32. Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London: Sage Publications.
33. McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38-54.
34. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167
35. A. Freedman, & P. Medway (Eds), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 23-42). London: Taylor and Francis.
36. Miller, C. R. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In: A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67-78). London: Taylor and Francis.
37. Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(March), 412-432.
38. Muniz, A. M., & Schau, H. J. (2005). Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4, March), 737-747.
39. Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541-574.
40. Poole, M. S. (1981). Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models. Communication Monographs, 48, 1-24.
41. Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behavior as social action. In: J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oaks, S. D. Reicher & M. Wetherell (Eds), Rediscovering the social group: A selfcategorization theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford and New York: Blackwell.
42. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43. Sacks, H. (1992). In: G. Jefferson (Ed.), Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
44. Sahlstein, E., & Duck, S. W. (2001). How to do things with relationships. In: H. Giles & W. Robinson (Eds), Handbook of language and social behavior (pp. 371-382). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
45. Scanzoni, J. (1979). Social exchange and behavioral interdependence. In: R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 61-98). New York: Academic Press.
46. Socha, T. (1999). Communication in family units: Studying the first 'group'. In: L. Frey, D. Gouran & M. Poole (Eds), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 475-492). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
47. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Postmes, T. (2000). Social psychological theories of computer-mediated communication: Social pain or social gaiñIn: P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds), The handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
48. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
50. Tepper, M. (1996). Usenet communities and the cultural politics of information. In: D. Porter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp. 39-54). New York: Routledge Inc.
51. Thompson, C. J., & Haytko, D. L. (1997). Speaking of fashion: Consumers' uses of fashion discourses and the appropriation of countervailing cultural meanings. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(June), 15-42.
52. Thompson, C. J., & Tambyah, S. K. (1999). Trying to be cosmopolitan. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(December), 214-241. (Pubitemid 33253138)
53. Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
54. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorisation theory. In: J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher & M. S. Wetherell (Eds), Rediscovering the social group: A selfcategorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
56. Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberspace: The rise of personalized networks. International Urban and Regional Research, 25, 227-252.
57. Wilbur, S. P. (1996). An archaeology of cyberspaces: Virtuality, community, identity. In: D. Porter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp. 5-22). New York: Routledge Inc.