Making a Mark: A computational and visual analysis of one researcher's intellectual domain

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1209-1232

  Skupin, André ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

geographic information science; knowledge visualization; scientometric analysis; spatialization

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; BIOGRAPHY; GIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DATA; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84901355371     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2014.906040     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adriaanse, L.S. and Rensleigh, C., 2013. Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: a content comprehensiveness comparison. The Electronic Library, 31 (6), 727-744. doi:10.1108/EL-12-2011-0174.
2. Ahearn, S.C., et al., 2013. Re-engineering the GIS&T body of knowledge. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (11), 2227-2245. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.802324.
3. Alonso, S., et al., 2009. h-index: a review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273-289. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
4. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., and Jacomy, M., 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: E. Adar, et al., eds. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM, 17-20 May 2009, San Jose, CA. Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press, 361-362.
5. Blondel, V.D., et al., 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, October (10), P10008. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.
6. Börner, K., 2007. Making sense of mankind's scholarly knowledge and expertise: collecting, interlinking, and organizing what we know and different approaches to mapping (network) science. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34, 808-825. doi:10.1068/b3302t.
7. Börner, K., 2011. Plug-and-play macroscopes. Communications of the ACM, 54, 60-69. doi:10.1145/1897852.1897871.
8. Börner, K., Chen, C., and Boyack, K.W., 2003. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37 (1), 179-255. doi:10.1002/aris.1440370106.
9. Börner, K., Sanyal, S., and Vespignani, A., 2007. Network science. In: B. Cronin, ed. Annual review of information science & technology. Vol. 41. Medford, NJ: Information Today/American Society for Information Science and Technology, 537-607.
10. Börner, K., et al., 2012. Design and update of a classification system: the UCSD map of science. PloS ONE, 7 (7), e39464. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039464.
11. Boudin, F., 2013. A comparison of centrality measures for graph-based keyphrase extraction. In: R. Mitkov and J.C. Park, eds. 6th international joint conference on natural Language processing, 14-18 October, Nagoya. Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, 834-838.
12. Boyack, K.W. and Klavans, R., 2010. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (12), 2389-2404. doi:10.1002/asi.21419.
13. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., and Börner, K., 2005. Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64, 351-374. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6.
14. Boyack, K.W., Small, H., and Klavans, R., 2013. Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 1759-1767. doi:10.1002/asi.22896.
15. Braam, R.R., Moed, H.F., and Van Raan, A.F., 1991. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (4), 233-251. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4<233::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-I.
16. Brandes, U., 2001. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25, 163-177. doi:10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249.
17. Carson, M.A. and Kirkby, M.J., 1972. Hillslope form and process. Cambridge University Press.
18. Chen, C., 2006. CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 359-377. doi:10.1002/asi.20317.
19. Chen, C. and Morris, S., 2003. Visualizing evolving networks: minimum spanning trees versus Pathfinder networks. In: T. Munzner and S. North, eds. 9th IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis 2003), 20-21 October, Seattle, WA. IEEE Computer Society, 67-74.
20. Chen, C. and Paul, R.J., 2001. Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. Computer, 34 (3), 65-71. doi:10.1109/2.910895.
21. Chen, C. and Paul, R.J., 2001. Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. Computer, 34 (3), 65-71. doi:10.1109/2.910895.
22. Crane, D., 1972. Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press.
23. Davidson, G.S., Wylie, B.N., and Boyack, K.W., 2001. Cluster stability and the use of noise in interpretation of clustering. In: K. Andrews, S.F. Roth, and P.C. Wong, eds. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2001 (INFOVIS 2001), 22-23 October 2001, San Diego, CA. IEEE Computer Society, 23-30.
24. de Solla Price, D.J., 1963. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Eades, P., 1984. A heuristic for graph drawing. Congressus Numerantium, 42, 149-160.
26. Egghe, L., 2010. The Hirsch index and related impact measures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44 (1), 65-114. doi:10.1002/aris.2010.1440440109.
27. Fabrikant, S.I. and Salvini, M., 2011. Charting the ICA world of cartography 1999-2009 [online]. In: A. Ruas, ed. Proceedings of the 25th international cartographic conference. 3-8 July, Paris. International Cartographic Association. Available from: http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2011/Oral%20Presentations%20PDF/C3-Geovisualisation%20and%20data%20exploration/CO-241.pdf [Accessed 20 April 2014].
28. Falagas, M.E., et al., 2008. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22 (2), 338-342. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
29. Freeman, L.C., 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40 (1), 35-41. doi:10.2307/3033543.
30. Gmür, M., 2003. Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: a methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57 (1), 27-57. doi:10.1023/A:1023619503005.
31. Gray, J.E., et al., 2012. Scholarish: Google Scholar and its value to the sciences. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 70. doi:10.5062/F4MK69T9.
32. Herr, B.W., et al., 2006. Designing highly flexible and usable cyberinfrastructures for convergence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1093, 161-179. doi:10.1196/annals.1382.013.
33. Hirsch, J., 2005. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
34. Jacso, P., 2012. Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports databases: reflections on Vanclay's criticism. Scientometrics, 92 (2), 325-354. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0769-7.
35. Kamada, T. and Kawai, S., 1989. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31, 7-15. doi:10.1016/0020-0190(89)90102-6.
36. Kessler, M.M., 1963. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14 (1), 10-25. doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103.
37. Klavans, R. and Boyack, K.W., 2006. Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science. Scientometrics, 68 (3), 475-499. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0125-x.
38. Lancichinetti, A. and Fortunato, S., 2009. Community detection algorithms: a comparative analysis. Physical Review E, 80 (5), 056117. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.80.056117.
39. Larivière, V., et al., 2006. The place of serials in referencing practices: comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (8), 997-1004. doi:10.1002/asi.20349.
40. McCain, K.W., 1990. Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (6), 433-443. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<433::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-Q.
41. Moed, H.F., 2005. Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
42. O'Callaghan, J.F. and Mark, D.M., 1984. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 28, 323-344. doi:10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0.
43. Quirin, A., et al., 2008a. A quick MST-based algorithm to obtain Pathfinder networks (∞, n -1). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1912-1924. doi:10.1002/asi.20904.
44. Quirin, A., et al., 2008b. A new variant of the Pathfinder algorithm to generate large visual science maps in cubic time. Information Processing & Management, 44, 1611-1623. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.005.
45. Ronhovde, P. and Nussinov, Z., 2009. Multiresolution community detection for megascale networks by information-based replica correlations. Physical Review E, 80 (1), 016109. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.80.016109.
46. Rosvall, M. and Bergstrom, C.T., 2008. Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (4), 1118-1123. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706851105.
47. Salton, G., 1989. Automated text processing: the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
48. Schvaneveldt, R., ed., 1990. Pathfinder associative networks: studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49. 2 Team, 2009. Science of Science (Sci2) Tool [online]. Indiana University and SciTech Strategies. Available from: https://sci2.cns.iu.edu [Accessed 26 April 2014].
50. Serra, J.P., 1982. Image analysis and mathematical morphology. London: Academic Press.
51. Skupin, A., 2002. A cartographic approach to visualizing conference abstracts. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 22, 50-58. doi:10.1109/38.974518.
52. Skupin, A., 2008. Spatialization. In: K. Kemp, ed. Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 418-422.
53. Skupin, A., 2009. Discrete and continuous conceptualizations of science: implications for knowledge domain visualization. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 233-245. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.002.
54. Small, H., 1973. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4), 265-269. doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406.
55. Small, H., 1999. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (9), 799-813.
56. Smith, B., 2003. Ontology. In: L. Floridi, ed. Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information. Oxford: Blackwell, 155-166.
57. Smith, B. and Mark, D.M., 2003. Do mountains exist? Towards an ontology of landforms. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 411-427. doi:10.1068/b12821.
58. Van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L., 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523-538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
59. Van Raan, A.F., 2005. Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62 (1), 133-143. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6.
60. Vargas-Quesada, B. and de Moya Anegón, F., 2007. Visualizing the structure of science. Berlin: Springer.
61. Wagner, C.S., et al., 2011. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5 (1), 14-26. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004.
62. Wang, X., Chen, C., and Liu, Z., 2008. Evolution of geographic information systems research front using information visualizing network [online]. In: H. Kretschmer and F. Havemann, eds. Fourth international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics & ninth COLLNET meeting, 28 July-1 August. Berlin: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung. Available from: http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-008/WangXianwenWIS2008egi.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2014].
63. White, H.D. and McCain, K.W., 1998. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (4), 327-355.
64. Yan, E. and Ding, Y., 2012. Scholarly network similarities: how bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (7), 1313-1326. doi:10.1002/asi.22680.
65. Yang, K. and Meho, L.I., 2006. Citation analysis: a comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43 (1), 1-15. doi:10.1002/meet.14504301185.