High-quality image acquisition by double exposure overlap in dental cone beam computed tomography

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

Volumn 117, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 760-767

  Plachtovics, Mark ^a   Bujtar, Peter ^b   Mommaerts, Maurice ^c   Nagy, Katalin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^c VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84901309869     PISSN: 22124403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. W.C. Scarfe, and A.G. Farman Cone-beam computed tomography C.W. Stuart, J.P. Michael, Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation 2009 Mosby St Louis, MO 225 237
2. A.C. Miracle, and S.K. Mukherji Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles Am J Neuroradiol 30 2009 1088 1095
3. M.O. Lagravére, J. Carey, M. Ben-Zvi, G.V. Packota, and P.W. Major Effect of object location on the density measurement and Hounsfield conversion in a NewTom 3 G cone beam computed tomography unit Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37 2008 305 308
4. R. González-García, and F. Monje The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT Clin Oral Implants Res 23 2012 1 9
5. P. Mah, T.E. Reeves, and W.D. McDavid Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39 2010 323 335
6. P. Metzler, W. Zemann, and H.T. Lübbers et al. Bone mineral density measurements performed by cone-beam computed tomography in the bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis-affected jaw Oral Radiol 28 2012 101 108
7. O. Nackaerts, F. Maes, H. Yan, P. Couto Souza, R. Pauwels, and R. Jacobs Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography Clin Oral Implants Res 22 2011 873 879
8. P. Mozzo, C. Procacci, A. Tacconi, P.T. Martini, and I.A. Andreis A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results Eur Radiol 8 1998 1558 1564
9. M.L. Oliveira, G.M. Tosoni, D.H. Lindsey, K. Mendoza, S. Tetradis, and S.M. Mallya Influence of anatomical location on CT numbers in cone beam computed tomography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115 2013 558 564
10. I.M. Silva, D.Q. Freitas, G.M. Ambrosano, F.N. Bóscolo, and S.M. Almeida Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography Braz Oral Res 26 2012 550 556
11. F. Azeredo, L.M. de Menezes, R. Enciso, A. Weissheimer, and R.B. de Oliveira Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144 2013 147 155
12. A. Yamashina, K. Tanimoto, P. Sutthiprapaporn, and Y. Hayakawa The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37 2008 245 251
13. K. Araki, K. Maki, and K. Seki et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial x-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33 2004 51 59
14. R. Molteni Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 116 2013 105 119
15. A. Katsumata, H. Akiko, and O. Shinji et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized topographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107 2009 420 425
16. T.E. Reeves, P. Mah, and W.D. McDavid Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41 2012 500 508
17. A. Willi Kalender. Computertomographie 2nd ed. 2006 Publicis Corporate Publishing Erlangen, Germany
18. A. Katsumata, A. Hirukawa, and S. Okumura et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104 2007 829 836
19. M.O. Lagravére, Y. Fang, J. Carey, R.W. Toogood, G.V. Packota, and P.W. Major Density conversion factor determined using a cone-beam computed tomography unit NewTom QR-DVT 9000 Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 2006 407 409
20. F. Khoury, Th Hanser, and Ch Khoury et al. Komplikationen und Risiken bei augmentativen Maßnahmen F. Khoury, Augmentative Verfahren in der Implantologie 2009 Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH Berlin, Germany 429 514
21. F. Khoury, Th Hanser, and Ch Khoury et al. Planung und Diagnostik F. Khoury, Augmentative Verfahren in der Implantologie 2009 Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH Berlin, Germany 41 86
22. J.A. Bryant, N.A. Drage, and S. Richmond Study of the scan uniformity from an iCAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37 2008 365 374
23. G.R. Swennen, and F. Schutyser Three dimensional cephalometry: spiral multislice vs cone-beam computed tomography Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 2006 410 416
24. W. De Vos, J. Casselman, and G.R. Swennen Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38 2009 609 625
25. H.K. Tuy An inversion formula for cone-beam reconstruction SIAM J Appl Math 43 1983 546 552
26. R. Schulze, U. Heil, and D. Groß et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40 2011 265 273
27. T.H. Köhler, R. Proksa, and M. Grass A fast and efficient method for sequential cone-beam tomography Med Phys 28 2001 2318 2327
28. K. Horner, M. Islam, L. Flygare, K. Tsiklakis, and E. Whaites Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38 2009 187 195