Exposure to Outgroup Members Criticizing Their Own Group Facilitates Intergroup Openness

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 791-802

  Saguy, Tamar ^a   Halperin, Eran ^a  

^a INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

hope; ingroup criticism; outgroup openness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901038081     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167214525475     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akaike H.A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19:716-723.
2. Bar-Tal D.Why does fear override hope in societies engulfed by intractable conflict, as it does in the Israeli society?.Political Psychology. 2001;22:601-627.
3. Bar-Tal D.Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts.American Behavioral Scientist. 2007;50:1430-1453.
4. Bar-Tal D.,Halperin E.Prosocial motives, emotions and behavior. Mikulincer M.Shaver P. R., ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press; 2009:431-448.
5. Bar-Tal D.,Rosen Y.Peace education in societies involved in intractable conflicts: Direct and indirect models.Review of Educational Research. 2009;79:557-575.
6. Brauer M.,Er-rafiy A.Increasing perceived variability reduces prejudice and discrimination.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011;47:871-877.
7. Breznitz S.Dynamics of stress: Physiological, psychological, and social perspectives. Appley M. H.Trumbull R., ed. New York, NY: Plenum; 1986:295-306.
8. Čehajić S.,Effron D.,Halperin E.,Liberman V.,Ross L.Affirmation, acknowledgment of ingroup responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;101:256-270.
9. Chan M. K. H.,Louis W. R.,Hornsey M. J.The effects of exclusion and reintegration on the evaluation of deviant opinion holders.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2009;35:1619-1631.
10. Cohen-Chen S.,Halperin E.,Crisp R. J.,Gross J. J.Hope in the Middle East: Malleability beliefs, hope, and the willingness to compromise for peace.Social Psychological & Personality Science. 2014;5:67-75.
11. Coleman P. T.Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Towards the development of a meta-framework-I.Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 2003;9:1-37.
12. Crowley A. W.,Hoyer W. D.An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion.Journal of Consumer Research. 1994;20:561-574.
13. Eidelman S.,Biernat M.Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection?.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2003;39:602-609.
14. Eidelman S.,Silvia P. J.,Biernat M.Responding to deviance: Target exclusion and differential devaluation.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006;32:1153-1164.
15. Faison E. W. J.Effectiveness of one-sided and two-sided mass communication in advertising.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1961;25:468-469.
16. Halperin E.,Bar-Tal D.The fall of the peace camp in Israel.Conflict and Communication Online. 2007;6:1-18.
17. Halperin E.,Bar-Tal D.Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: An empirical examination within the Israeli Jewish society.Journal of Peace Research. 2011;48:637-651.
18. Halperin E.,Crisp R.,Husnu S.,Dweck C.,Gross J.Promoting intergroup contact by changing beliefs: Group malleability intergroup anxiety and contact motivation.Emotion. 2012;12:1192-1195.
19. Halperin E.,Russell G. A.,Trzesniewski H. K.,Gross J. J.,Dweck S. C.Promoting the peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability.Science. 2011;333:1767-1969.
20. HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
21. Hornsey M. J.Why being right is not enough: Predicting defensiveness in the face of group criticism.European Review of Social Psychology. 2005;16:301-334.
22. Hornsey M. J.,Grice T.,Jetten J.,Paulsen N.,Callan V.Group-directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more defensiveness than old-timers.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2007;33:1036-1048.
23. Hornsey M. J.,Imani A.Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004;30:365-383.
24. Hornsey M. J.,Robson E.,Smith J. R.,Esposo S.,Sutton R.Sugaring the pill: Assessing rhetorical strategies designed to minimize defensive reactions to group criticism.Human Communication Research. 2008;34:70-98.
25. Hornsey M. J.,Trembath M.,Gunthorpe S."You can criticize because you care": Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2004;34:499-518.
26. Hovland C. I.,Janis I. L.,Kelley H. H.Communications and persuasion: Psychological studies in opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1953:.
27. Hu L.,Bentler P. M.Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6:1-55.
28. Iwao S.Internal versus external criticism of group standards.Sociometry. 1963;26:410-421.
29. Jarymowicz M.,Bar-Tal D.The dominance of fear over hope in the life of individuals and collectives.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2006;36:367-392.
30. Kelman H. C.,Hovland C. I."Re instatement" of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1953;48:327-335.
31. Kruglanski A. W.The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Psychology Press; 2004:.
32. Kteily N.,Saguy T.,Sidanius J.,Taylor D. M.Negotiating power: Agenda ordering and the willingness to negotiate in asymmetric intergroup conflicts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2013;105:978-995.
33. Levine J. M.Psychology of group influence. Paulus P. B., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1989:187-231.
34. Lewin K.Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Cartwright D., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1976:143-153.
35. Marques J. M.,Paez D.The black sheep effect: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability.European Review of Social Psychology. 1994;5:37-68.
36. Marques J.M.,Yzerbyt V.Y.,Leyens J.P.The black sheep effect: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1988;18:1-16.
37. Packer D. J.On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2008;12:50-72.
38. Pronin E.Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007;11:37-43.
39. Pronin E.,Gilovich T.,Ross L.Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others.Psychological Review. 2004;111:781-799.
40. Rydell R. J.,Hugenberg K.,Ray D.,Mackie D. M.Implicit theories about groups and stereotyping: The role of group entitativity.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2007;33:549-558.
41. Saguy T.,Tausch N.,Dovidio J. F.,Pratto F.The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality.Psychological Science. 2009;20:114-112.
42. Snyder C. R.The psychology of hope. New York, NY: Free Press; 1994:.
43. Tata J.,Anthony T.,Lin H.,Newman B.,Tang S.,Millson M.,Sivakumar K.Proportionate group size and rejection of the deviate: A meta analytic integration.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1996;11:739-752.