The effect of Fenton chemistry on the properties of microfibrillated cellulose

Cellulose

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1489-1503

  Hellström, Pia ^a,b   Heijnesson Hultén, Anette ^a   Paulsson, Magnus ^a,c   Håkansson, Helena ^b   Germgård, Ulf ^b  

^a AKZO NOBEL CENTRAL RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b KARLSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Carbohydrate composition; Carbonyl groups; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Fenton chemistry; Microfibrillated cellulose; Suspension stability; Total and surface charge

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; KRAFT PULP;

CARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITIONS; CARBONYL GROUPS; FENTON CHEMISTRY; MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; SUSPENSION STABILITY;

FUNCTIONAL GROUPS;

CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; HYDROLYSIS; KRAFT PULPING;

EID: 84901035117     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0243-1     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87(2): 963-979.
2. Andresen M, Johansson L-S, Tanem BS, Stenius P (2006) Properties and characterization of hydrophobized microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 13(6): 665-677.
3. Barb WG, Baxendale JH, George P, Hargrave HG (1951) Reactions of ferrous and ferric ions with hydrogen peroxide. J Chem Soc Faraday T 47: 462-500.
4. Bhandari PN, Jones DD, Hanna MA (2012) Carboxymethylation of cellulose using reactive extrusion. Carbohydr Polym 87(3): 2246-2254.
5. Bhardwaj NK, Duong TD, Nguyen KL (2004) Pulp charge determination by different methods: effect of beating/refining. Colloid Surf A 236(1-3): 39-44.
6. Brännvall E, Annergren G (2004) Pulp characterisation. In: Ek M, Henriksson G (eds) Pulp and paper chemistry and technology, vol 2. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 430-459.
7. Chinga-Carrasco G (2011) Cellulose fibres, nanofibril and microfibrils: the morphological sequence of MFC components from a plant physiology and fibre technology point of view. Nanoscale Res Lett 6(417): 1-7.
8. Eriksen Ø, Syverud K, Gregersen Ø (2008) The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 23(3): 299-303.
9. Fenton HJH (1894) Oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron. J Chem Soc Faraday T 65: 899-910.
10. Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase ativities. Pure Appl Chem 59(2): 257-268.
11. 2·) and hydroxyl (OH·) radicals in TCF bleaching processes: a review. Holzforschung 51(1): 34-46.
12. Haber F, Weiss J (1934) The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by iron salts. Proc R Soc 147: 332-351.
13. Henniges U, Okubayashi S, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2012) Irradiation of cellulosic pulps: understanding its impact on cellulose oxidation. Biomacromolecules 13(12): 4171-4178.
14. Henriksson G, Christiernin M, Agnemo R (2005) Monocomponent endoglucanase treatment increases the reactivity of softwood sulphite dissolving pulp. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 32(5): 211-214.
15. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43(8): 3434-3441.
16. Horvath AE, Lindström T, Laine J (2005) On the indirect polyelectrolyte titration of cellulosic fibers. Conditions for charge stoichiometry and comparison with ESCA. Langmuir 22(2): 824-830.
17. Hubbe M, Orlando J (2008) Colloidal stability and aggregation of lignocellulosic materials in aqueous suspension: a review. Bioresources 3(4): 1419-1491.
18. Isogai A (2009) Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils achieved by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst. paper presented at the international conference of nanotechnology for the forest products industry, Edmonton, Canada, 23-26 June.
19. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3(1): 71-85.
20. Iwamoto S, Kai W, Isogai T, Saito T, Isogai A, Iwata T (2010) Comparison study of TEMPO-analogous compounds on oxidation efficiency of wood cellulose for preparation of cellulose nanofibrils. Polym Degrad Stab 95(8): 1394-1398.
21. Jain P, Vigneshwaran N (2012) Effect of Fenton's pretreatment on cotton cellulosic substrates to enhance its enzymatic hydrolysis response. Bioresource Technol 103(1): 219-226.
22. Jeong M-J, Dupont A-L, de la Rie ER (2014) Degradation of cellulose at the wet-dry interface. II. Study of oxidation reactions and effect of antioxidants. Carbohydr Polym 101: 671-683.
23. Katz S, Beatson R, Scallan A (1984) The determination of strong and weak acidic groups in sulfite pulps. Svensk Papperstidning 6(87): 48-53.
24. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H-P, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: faszinierendes biopolymer und nachhaltiger Rohstoff. Angew Chem Ger Edit 117(22): 3422-3458.
25. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Edit 50(24): 5438-5466.
26. Lai Y-Z (2001) Chemical degradation. In: Hon DN-S, Shiraishi N (eds) Wood and cellulsic chemistry, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, Basel, pp 443-512.
27. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose-Its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90(2): 735-764.
28. Marton R, Robie J (1969) Characterization of mechanical pulps by settling technique. Tappi J 52(12): 2400-2406.
29. Marx-Figini M (1978) Significance of the intrinsic viscosity ratio of unsubstituted and nitrated cellulose in different solvents. Angew Macromol Chem 72(1): 161-171.
30. Mishra S, Thirree J, Manent A-S, Chabot B, Daneault C (2011) Ultrasound-catalyzed TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose for the production of nanocellulose: effect of process variables. Bioresources 6(1): 121-143.
31. Mishra SP, Manent A-S, Chabot B, Daneault C (2012) The use of sodium chlorite in post-oxidation of tempo-oxidized pulp: effect on pulp characteristics and nanocellulose yield. J Wood Chem Technol 32(2): 137-148.
32. Norimoto M (2001) Chemical modification of wood. In: Hon DN-S, Shiraishi N (eds) Wood and cellulosic chemistry. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 573-598.
33. Oliva JM, Manzanares P, Ballesteros I, Negro MJ, González A, Ballesteros M (2005) Application of Fentonś reaction to steam explosion prehydrolysates from poplar biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 124(1-3): 887-899.
34. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8(6): 1934-1941.
35. Pignatello JJ, Oliveros E, MacKay A (2006) Advanced oxidation processes for organic contaminant destruction based on the Fenton reaction and related chemistry. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 36(1): 1-84.
36. Potthast A, Rosenau T, Kosma P, Saariaho A-M, Vuorinen T (2005) On the nature of carbonyl groups in cellulosic pulps. Cellulose 12(1): 43-50.
37. Roncero B, Colomb JF, Vidal T (2002) Application of post-treatments to the ozone bleaching of eucalypt pulp to increase the selectivity. Appita J 55(4): 305-309.
38. Roncero MB, Queral MA, Colom JF, Vidal T (2003) Why acid pH Increases the selectivity of the ozone bleaching processes. Ozone Sci Eng 25(6): 523-534.
39. Sandquist D (2013) New horizons for microfibrillated cellulose. Appita J 66(2): 156-162.
40. Schumb W, Satterfield C, Wenthworth R (1955) Hydrogen peroxide. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, pp 557-558.
41. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2(4): 728-765.
42. Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17(3): 459-494.
43. Stenstad P, Andresen M, Tanem B, Stenius P (2008) Chemical surface modifications of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 15(1): 35-45.
44. Süss H, Kronis J (1998)The correlation of COD and yield in chemical pulp bleaching. In: Tappi Breaking the Pulp Yield Barrier Symposium, Atlanta, GA, USA, 17-18 Feb, pp 153-162.
45. 2 and the oxidation of organic substrates. Russ Chem Rev 64(12): 1105-1129.
46. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16(1): 75-85.
47. Taipale T, Österberg M, Nykänen A, Ruokolainen J, Laine J (2010) Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength. Cellulose 17(5): 1005-1020.
48. Tejado A, Alam M, Antal M, Yang H, van de Ven T (2012) Energy requirements for the disintegration of cellulose fibers into cellulose nanofibers. Cellulose 19(3): 831-842.
49. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci, Appl Polym Symp 37: 815-827.
50. Walter K, Paulsson M, Wackerberg E (2009) Energy efficient refining of black source TMP by using acid hydrogen peroxide: part 1. A pilot plant study. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 24(3): 255-265.
51. Walter K, Paulsson M, Hellström P (2013) Acid hydrogen peroxide treatment of Norway spruce TMP: a model study using free ferrous ions and ferric ions chelated with EDTA as catalysts. J Wood Chem Technol 33(4): 267-285.
52. Wang Z-X, Li G, Yang F, Chen Y-L, Gao P (2011) Electro-Fenton degradation of cellulose using graphite/PTFE electrodes modified by 2-ethylanthraquinone. Carbohydr Polym 86(4): 1807-1813.
53. Zimmermann T, Pöhler E, Geiger T (2004) Cellulose fibrils for polymer reinforcement. Adv Eng Mater 6(9): 754-761.