Effect of Fenton's pretreatment on cotton cellulosic substrates to enhance its enzymatic hydrolysis response

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 219-226

  Jain, Prateek ^a   Vigneshwaran, Nadanathangam ^a  

^a ICAR CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COTTON TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Cellulase; Fenton's pretreatment; Microcrystalline cellulose; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

CELLULASE; CELLULASE ENZYME; CELLULOSE SUBSTRATES; CELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES; CONCENTRATION OF FE; DEGREE OF POLYMERIZATION; DIFFERENT PROCESS; ENZYME HYDROLYSIS; FENTON'S REACTION; FENTON'S REAGENTS; HIGH ASPECT RATIO; HYDROXYL RADICALS; LOW ASPECT RATIO; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; PRE-TREATMENT; PRETREATMENT AGENTS; PRETREATMENT CONDITIONS; REACTION PERIOD; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SUBSTRATE SIZES;

ASPECT RATIO; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; COTTON; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; OPTIMIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

SUBSTRATES;

FERROUS GLUCONATE;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIODEGRADATION; CELLULOSE; COTTON; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; HYDROLYSIS; HYDROXYL RADICAL; ION; IRON; POLYMERIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SUBSTRATE;

ARTICLE; COTTON; ENZYME DEGRADATION; HYDROLYSIS; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; GOSSYPIUM; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; HYDROLYSIS; IRON; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; POLYMERIZATION; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

CELLULASE; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; COTTON; ENZYMES; ENZYMOLYSIS; MICROSCOPY; OPTIMIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACES;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 82455191731     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.110     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allardyce B.J., Linton S.M., Saborowski R. The last piece in the cellulase puzzle: the characterisation of beta-glucosidase from the herbivorous gecarcinid land crab Gecarcoidea natalis. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213(17):2950-2957.
2. Bhat M.K. Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2000, 18(5):355-383.
3. Cao Y., Tan H. Study on crystal structures of enzyme-hydrolyzed cellulosic materials by X-ray diffraction. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2005, 36:314-317.
4. Carere C., Sparling R., Cicek N., Levin D. Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9(7):1342-1360.
5. Flournoy D.S. Chemical changes in wood components and cotton cellulose as a result of brown rot: is Fenton chemistry involved?. Biodeterioration Research 4. Mycotoxins, Wood Decay, Plant Stress, Biocorrosion, and General Biodeterioration 1994, 257-293. Plenum Press, New York. G.C. Llewellyn, W.V. Dashek, C.E. O'Rear (Eds.).
6. Fujii T., Murakami K., Sawayama S. Cellulase hyperproducing mutants derived from the fungus Trichoderma reesei QM9414 produced large amounts of cellulase at the enzymatic and transcriptional levels. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74(2):419-422.
7. Ghose T.K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59(2):257-268.
8. Haber F., Weiss J. The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by iron salts. Proc. R. Soc. A 1934, 147(861):332-351.
9. Habibi Y., Chanzy H., Vignon M.R. TEMPO-mediated surface oxidation of cellulose whiskers. Cellulose 2006, 13:679-687.
10. Hendriks A.T.W.M., Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(1):10-18.
11. Jeong G.-T., Kim D.-H., Park D.-H. Response surface methodological approach for optimization of free fatty acid removal in feedstock. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2007, 137-140(1):583-593.
12. Kane R.W., Timpa J.D. A high-performance liquid chromatography study of d-cellobiose degradation under Fenton conditions. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1992, 11(6):779-797.
13. Kirk T.K., Ibach R., Mozuch M.D., Conner A.H., Highley L. Characteristics of cotton cellulose depolymerized by a brown-rot fungus, by acid, or by chemical oxidants. Holzforschung 1991, 45(4):239-244.
14. Kumar V.S., Meenakshisundaram S., Selvakumar N. Conservation of cellulase enzyme in biopolishing application of cotton fabrics. J. Text. Inst. 2008, 99(4):339-346.
15. Lu Y., Yang B., Gregg D., Saddler J., Mansfield S. Cellulase adsorption and an evaluation of enzyme recycle during hydrolysis of steam-exploded softwood residues. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2002, 98-100(1):641-654.
16. Lynd L.R., Weimer P.J., van Zyl W.H., Pretorius I.S. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66(3):506-577.
17. Manini P., La Pietra P., Panzella L., Napolitano A., d'Ischia M. Glyoxal formation by fenton-induced degradation of carbohydrates and related compounds. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341:1828-1833.
18. Martinez D., Challacombe J., Morgenstern I., Hibbett D., Schmoll M., Kubicek C.P., Ferreira P., Ruiz-Duenas F.J., Martinez A.T., Kersten P., Hammel K.E., Vanden Wymelenberg A., Gaskell J., Lindquist E., Sabat G., Splinter BonDurant S., Larrondo L.F., Canessa P., Vicuna R., Yadav J., Doddapaneni H., Subramanian V., Pisabarro A.G., Lavín J.L., Oguiza J.A., Master E., Henrissat B., Coutinho P.M., Harris P., Magnuson J.K., Baker S.E., Bruno K., Kenealy W., Hoegger P.J., Kües U., Ramaiya P., Lucas S., Salamov A., Shapiro H., Tu H., Chee C.L., Misra M., Xie G., Teter S., Yaver D., James T., Mokrejs M., Pospisek M., Grigoriev I.V., Brettin T., Rokhsar D., Berka R., Cullen D. Genome, transcriptome, and secretome analysis of wood decay fungus Postia placenta supports unique mechanisms of lignocellulose conversion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106(6):1954-1959.
19. Oh S.Y., Yoo D.I., Shin Y., Seo G. FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340(3):417-428.
20. Oliva J., Manzanares P., Ballesteros I., Negro M., González A., Ballesteros M. Application of Fentonś reaction to steam explosion prehydrolysates from poplar biomass. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 124(1):887-899.
21. Olsson L., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996, 18(5):312-331.
22. Park J.S.B., Wood P.M., Gilbert B.C., Whitwood A.C. EPR Evidence for hydroxyl- and substrate-derived radicals in Fe(II)-oxalate/hydrogen peroxide reactions The importance of the reduction of Fe(III)-oxalate by oxygen-conjugated radicals to regenerate Fe(II) in reactions of carbohydrates and model compounds. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 5:923-932.
23. Ponrasu T., Manohar B., Divakar S. A response surface methodological study on prediction of glucosylation yields of thiamin using immobilized [beta]-glucosidase. Process Biochem. 2009, 44(2):251-255.
24. Qian Y., Goodell B., Genco J.M. The effect of a chelator mediated Fenton system on the fiber and paper properties of hardwood kraft pulp. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2002, 22(4):267-284.
25. Qing Q., Yang B., Wyman C.E. Impact of surfactants on pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:5941-5951.
26. Rättö M., Ritschkoff A.C., Viikari L. The effect of oxidative pretreatment on cellulose degradation by Poria placenta and Trichoderma reesei cellulases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 48(1):53-57.
27. Satyamurthy P., Jain P., Balasubramanya R.H., Vigneshwaran N. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanowhiskers from cotton fibres by controlled microbial hydrolysis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83(1):122-129.
28. Tejirian A., Xu F. Inhibition of cellulase-catalyzed lignocellulosic hydrolysis by iron and oxidative metal ions and complexes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76(23):7673-7682.
29. Tereschenko L.Y., Shamolina I.I. The use of cellulases to improve the sorption properties of cellulosic wound dressings. J. Text I. 1998, 89(3):9.
30. Wang J.L., Zhao H., Ling X., Jiang B., Ouyang P. Application of response surface methodology optimization for the production of caffeic acid from tobacco waste. Afr. J. Biotechnol 2009, 8(8):9.
31. 4). Holzforschung 2003, 57(4):447-452.