An overview of learning object repositories

Learning Objects for Instruction: Design and Evaluation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 29-55

  Tzikopoulos, Argiris ^a   Manouselis, Nikos ^a   Vuorikari, Riina ^b,c  

^a AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c European Schoolnet ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900603979     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-334-0.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Academic ADL Co-Lab. (n.d.). Content repositories as eLearning tools community building with repository services. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/Repositories_Tools.pdf
2. Balanskat, A. (2005). Country reports. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://insight.eun.org/ww/en/pub/insight/misc/country_report.cfm
3. Balanskat, A., & Vuorikari, R. (2000). Survey on school educational repositories (D 2.1). European Treasury Browser, European Schoolnet.
4. Benbya, H., & Belbaly, N. (2002, December). The "new" new economy lessons learned from the burst of dot-com's bubble: Dispelling the myths of the new economy. Journal of E-Business, 2(2).
5. Broisin, J. (2005). Sharing & re-using learning objects: Learning management systems and learning object repositories. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005, Norfolk, VA (pp. 4558-4565).
6. CanCore. (2002). Canadian core learning resource metadata application profile. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.cancore.ca/indexen.html
7. Cardinaels, K., Meire, M., & Duval, E. (2005, May 10-14). Automating metadata generation: The simple indexing interface. Paper presented at the International World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2005, Chiba, Japan.
8. CEN/ISSS. (2005). Harmonisation of vocabularies for elearning. CEN/ISSS Learning Technologies Workshop, CWA 15453.
9. Chatzinotas, S., & Sampson, D. (2005, February). Exploiting the learning object paradigm for supporting Web-based learning communities. In Proceedings of the 4th IASTED International Conference on Web-based Education (WBE 2005), Grindelwald, Switzerland (pp. 165-170).
10. Downes, S. (2003, January 7). Design and reusability of learning objects in an academic context: A new economy of education? USDLA Journal.
11. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1 (2004). Reference description. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://dublincore.org/documents/2004/12/20/dces/
12. Duncan, C. (2002, September). Digital repositories: The 'back-office of e-learning or all e-learning?' In Proceedings of ALT-C 2002, Sunderland.
13. Duval, E. (2005, May 19-20). A learning object manifesto towards share and reuse on a global scale. Paper presented at the elearning Conference, Brussels, Belgium.
14. Duval, E., & Hodgins, W. (2003). A LOM research agenda. In Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 1-9).
15. Friesen, N. (2001). What are educational objects? Interactive Learning Environments, 9(3) 219-230.
16. Hatala, M., Richards, G., Scott, T., & Merriman, J. (2004, June 21-26). Closing the interoperability gap: Connecting open service interfaces with digital repository interoperability. In Proceedings of the International Conference (Ed-Media), Lugano, Switzerland (pp. 78-83).
17. Haughey, M., & Muirhead, B. (2004). Evaluating learning objects for schools. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 8(1). University of Southern Queensland, Australia.
18. Holden, C. (2003, November 11). From local challenges to a global community: Learning repositories and the global learning repositories summit (Version 1.0). Academic ADL Co-Lab.
19. Ianella, R. (2002, June 20). Digital rights management (DRM) in education: The need for open standards. Paper presented at the Digital Rights Expression Language Study Workshop. Kirkland WA.
20. IEEE LOM. (2002, July 15). Draft standard for learning object metadata. IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee.
21. IMS. (2001). IMS learning resource meta-data specification. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.imsglobal.org/metadata
22. IMS Global Consortium. (2003). IMS digital repositories v1.0: Final specification. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.imsglobal.org/digitalrepositories/
23. ISO/IEC. (2004). Report: LOM implementation in Japan. ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36 Information technology for learning, education, and training. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://jtc1sc36.org/doc/36N0720.pdf
24. ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36. (n.d.). Working group 1: Vocabulary, international standardisation organisation (ISO). Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://vocabulary.jtc1sc36.org/
25. Lemire, D., Boley, H., McGarth, S., & Ball, M. (2005). Collaborative filtering and inference rules for context-aware learning object recommendation. International Journal of Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2(3). Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.daniel-lemire.com/fr/abstracts/ITSE2005.html
26. Ma, W. (2005). Learning object recommender systems. Paper presented at the IASTED International Conference, Education and Technology, Simon Fraser University.
27. Massart, D., & Le, D.T. (2004). Federated search of learning object repositories: The CELEBRATE approach. In M. Bui (Ed.), Actes de la Deuxieme Conference Internationale Associant Chercheurs Vietnameniens et Francophones en Informatique, (pp. 143-146). Hanoï, Vietnam. Studia Informatica Universalis.
28. th Biennial Conference, Improving Learning: Fostering the Will to Learn.
29. McCormick, R., Scrimshaw, P., Li, N., & Clifford, C. (2004). CELEBRATE evaluation report. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.eun.org/eun.org2/eun/Include_to_content/celebrate/file/Deliverable7_2EvaluationReport-02Dec04.pdf
30. Metros, S.E., & Bennet, K. (2002, November 1). Learning objects in higher education (Research Bulletin). EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, 19.
31. Miller, P. (1996). Metadata for the masses. Ariadne, 5.
32. Najjar, J., Meire, M., & Duval, E. (2005, June 27-July 2). Attention metadata management: Tracking the use of learning objects through attention XML. In Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Montréal, Canada.
33. Najjar, J., Ternier, S., & Duval, E. (2003). The actual use of metadata in ARIADNE: An empirical analysis. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Ariadne Conference (pp. 1-6).
34. Nelson, T. (1965). A file structure for the complex, the changing and the indeterminate. In Proceedings of the ACM National Conference.
35. Nesbit, J., Belfer, K., & Vargo, J. (2002, Fall). A convergent participation model for evaluation of learning objects. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 28(3).
36. Nesbit, J. C., & Li, J. (2004, July 21-25). Web-based tools for learning object evaluation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education and Information Systems: Technologies and Application, Orlando, FL.
37. Neven, F., & Duval, E. (2002). Reusable learning objects: A survey of LOM-based repositories. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 291-294).
38. OKI the Repository Open Services Interface Definitions (OSID). (n.d.). Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.okiproject.org/specs/osid_12.html
39. Pisik, G.B. (1997, July-August). Is this course instructionally sound? A guide to evaluating online training courses. Educational Technology, pp. 50-59.
40. Polsani, P. (2003). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4). Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v03/i04/Polsani/
41. Rafaeli, S., Dan-Gur, Y., & Barak, M. (2005, April-June). Social recommender systems: Recommendations in support of e-learning. Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 3(2), 29-45.
42. Recker, M., Walker, A., & Lawless, K. (2003). What do you recommend? Implementation and analyses of collaborative filtering of Web resources for education. Instructional Science, 31(4/5), 229-316.
43. Retalis, S. (2004). Usable and interoperable e-learning resources and repositories. S. Mishra & R.C. Sharma (Eds.), Interactive multimedia in education and training. London: IGI Global.
44. Riddy, P., & Fill, K. (2004). Evaluating e-learning resources. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference, Lancaster, UK.
45. Simon, J., & Colin, J.N. (2004, July 5-7). A digital licensing model for the exchange of learning objects in a federated environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Electronic Commerce, San Diego, CA.
46. Simon, B., David, M., Van Assche, F., Ternier, S., Duval, E., Brantner, S., Olmedilla, D., & Miklós, Z. (2005, May 10-14). A simple query interface for interoperable learning repositories. Paper presented at the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2005), Chiba, Japan.
47. Smith, R.S. (2004). Guidelines for authors of learning objects (White paper). Retrieved February 20, 2007, from New Media Consortium, http://www.nmc.org/guidelines
48. Stringer, R. (1992). Theseus: A project at Liverpool Polytechnic to develop a hypermedia library for open and flexible learning. Attention Metadata Management, 18(3), 267-273. International Federation of Library Assistants.
49. Turnbull, G. (2005). eCOLOURS: Analysis of copyright and licensing issues (CO-developing and localizing learning resources for schools: A feasibility project EDC 40291.2005).
50. Tzikopoulos, A., Manouselis, N., Costopoulou, C., Yalouris, C., & Sideridis, A. (2005, October 12-14). Investigating digital learning repositories' coverage of agriculture-related topics. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Information Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment (ITAFE05), Adana, Turkey.
51. Van Assche, F., & Massart, D. (2004, August). Federation and brokerage of learning objects and their metadata. In Proceedings. of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2004), Joensuu, Finland.
52. Vuorikari, R., Manouselis, N., & Duval E. (in press). Using metadata for storing, sharing, and reusing evaluations in social recommendation: The case of learning resources. In D. H. Go & S. Foo (Eds.), Social information retrieval systems: Emerging technologies and applications for searching the Web effectively. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
53. Wiley, D. (Ed.) (2002). The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington. IN: AECT. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://reusability.org/read/