Current concepts in orthopaedic surgery and future directions

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 96 B, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 569-573

  Sullivan, M P ^a   McHale, K J ^a   Parvizi, J ^a,b   Mehta, S ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEFAZOLIN; CHROMIUM; COBALT; FIBRONECTIN; GOLD NANOPARTICLE; HYDROXYAPATITE; MOLYBDENUM; NANOCOMPOSITE; NANOCRYSTAL; NANOFILM; SELENIUM; SILVER NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM; VITRONECTIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANTIINFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BONE CELL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SURFACE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONDUCTANCE; CYTOTOXICITY; DEVICE SAFETY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FRACTURE HEALING; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INFECTION PREVENTION; INFLAMMATION; MELTING POINT; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; MESENCHYME CELL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NANOENGINEERING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOTOXICOLOGY; NERVE REGENERATION; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; ORTHOPEDIC PROSTHESIS; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; OSTEOBLAST; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PARTICLE SIZE; PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; QUANTUM MECHANICS; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENDON DISEASE; TRABECULAR BONE; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; WOUND HEALING; BONE PROSTHESIS; EQUIPMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NANO-ORTHOPAEDICS; NANOMEDICINE; NANOPHASE; OSSEO-INTEGRATION; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES;

DRUG DELIVERY; HYDROXYAPATITE; NANO-ORTHOPAEDICS; NANOPHASE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSSEO-INTEGRATION;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BONE SUBSTITUTES; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; NANOMEDICINE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84900531049     PISSN: 20494394     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.33606     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Tasker LH, Sparey-Taylor GJ, Nokes LD. Applications of nanotechnology in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;456:243-249. (Pubitemid 46662425)
2. Mehta S, Parvizi J. Nanotechnology in Orthopaedic Surgery. US Musculoskelet Rev 2009;4:8-10.
3. Paull J, Lyons K. Nanotechnology: the next challenge for organics. J Org Syst 2008;3:3-22.
4. Feynman R. There's plenty of room at the bottom. Eng Sci 1960;23:22-36.
5. Laurencin CT, Kumbar SG, Nukavarapu SP. Nanotechnology and orthopedics: a personal perspective. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2009;1:6-10.
6. No authors listed. BCC Research. http://www.bccresearch.com/market- research/nanotechnology/nanotechnology-market-applications-products-nan031e. html (date last accessed 17 March 2014).
7. Balasundaram G, Webster TJ. An overview of nano-polymers for orthopedic applications. Macromol Biosci 2007;7:635-642. (Pubitemid 47264637)
8. Streicher RM, Schmidt M, Fiorito S. Nanosurfaces and nanostructures for artificial orthopedic implants. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2007;2:861-874.
9. Torrecillas R, Moya JS, Díaz LA, et al. Nanotechnology in joint replacement. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2009;1:540-552.
10. Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, McLachlan T, et al. Differential responses of osteoblast lineage cells to nanotopographically-modified, microroughened titanium-aluminum- vanadium alloy surfaces. Biomaterials 2012;33:8986-8994.
11. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007;6:997-1003. (Pubitemid 350210577)
12. Schofer MD, Roessler PP, Schaefer J, et al. Electrospun PLLA nanofiber scaffolds and their use in combination with BMP-2 for reconstruction of bone defects. PLoS One 2011;6:25462.
13. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:2130-2135.
14. McMurray RJ, Gadegaard N, Tsimbouri PM, et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater 2011;10:637-644.
15. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004;25:4731-4739. (Pubitemid 38561160)
16. Appleford MR, Oh S, Oh N, Ong JL. In vivo study on hydroxyapatite scaffolds with trabecular architecture for bone repair. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;89:1019-1027.
17. Price RL, Waid MC, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. Biomaterials 2003;24:1877-1887. (Pubitemid 36293333)
18. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;21:1803-1810. (Pubitemid 30365044)
19. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;20:1221-1227. (Pubitemid 29279815)
20. Perla V, Webster TJ. Better osteoblast adhesion on nanoparticulate selenium: A promising orthopedic implant material. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;75:356-364. (Pubitemid 41463905)
21. Yang L, Sheldon BW, Webster TJ. Orthopedic nano diamond coatings: control of surface properties and their impact on osteoblast adhesion and proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;91:548-556.
22. Misra SK, Mohn D, Brunner TJ, et al. Comparison of nanoscale and microscale bioactive glass on the properties of P(3HB)/Bioglass composites. Biomaterials 2008;29:1750-1761.
23. Palin E, Liu H, Webster TJ. Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation. Nanotechnology 2005;16:1828-1835. (Pubitemid 41107852)
24. Marelli B, Ghezzi CE, Mohn D, et al. Accelerated mineralization of dense collagennano bioactive glass hybrid gels increases scaffold stiffness and regulates osteoblastic function. Biomaterials 2011;32:8915-8926.
25. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001;7:291-301. (Pubitemid 32574927)
26. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. Tissue Eng 2005;11:1-18. (Pubitemid 40515171)
27. Abu-Amer Y, Darwech I, Clohisy JC. Aseptic loosening of total joint replacements: mechanisms underlying osteolysis and potential therapies. Arthritis Res Ther 2007;9 Suppl1:S6.
28. Jacobs JJ, Campbell PA, T Konttinen Y; Implant Wear Symposium 2007 Biologic Work Group. How has the biologic reaction to wear particles changed with newer bearing surfaces? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16Suppl1:S49-S55.
29. Misra N, Kapusetti G, Jaiswal S, Maiti P. Toughening of bone cement using nanoparticle: The effect of solvent. J Appl Polym Sci 2011;121:1203-1213.
30. Harvey EJ, Henderson JE, Vengallatore ST. Nanotechnology and bone healing. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24Suppl1:S25-S30.
31. Huber FX, Hillmeier J, Herzog L, et al. Open reduction and palmar plate-osteosynthesis in combination with a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite spacer in the treatment of comminuted fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Br 2006;31:298-303.
32. Huber FX, McArthur N, Hillmeier J, et al. Void filling of tibia compression fracture zones using a novel resorbable nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste in combination with a hydroxyapatite ceramic core: first clinical results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126:533-540. (Pubitemid 44473278)
33. Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, et al. A novel nano-composite multi-layered biomaterial for treatment of osteochondral lesions: technique note and an early stability pilot clinical trial. Injury 2010;41:693-701.
34. Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, Altadonna G, Marcacci M. Novel nano-composite multi-layered biomaterial for the treatment of multifocal degenerative cartilage lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009;17:1312-1315.
35. Nilsonne G, Sun X, Nyström C, et al. Selenite induces apoptosis in sarcomatoid malignant mesothelioma cells through oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med 2006;41:874-885. (Pubitemid 44262481)
36. Tran PA, Sarin L, Hurt RH, Webster TJ. Titanium surfaces with adherent selenium nanoclusters as a novel anticancer orthopedic material. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;93:1417-1428.
37. Shi Z, Huang X, Liu B, et al. Biological response of osteosarcoma cells to size-controlled nanostructured hydroxyapatite. J Biomater Appl 2010;25:19-37.
38. Lu S, Gao W, Gu HY. Construction, application and biosafety of silver nanocrystalline chitosan wound dressing. Burns 2008;34:623-628.
39. Atiyeh BS, Costagliola M, Hayek SN, Dibo SA. Effect of silver on burn wound infection control and healing: review of the literature. Burns 2007;33:139-148. (Pubitemid 46188672)
40. Zhao L, Wang H, Huo K, et al. Antibacterial nano-structured titania coating incorporated with silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2011;32:5706-5716.
41. Ding T, Luo ZJ, Zheng Y, Hu XY, Ye ZX. Rapid repair and regeneration of damaged rabbit sciatic nerves by tissue-engineered scaffold made from nano-silver and collagen type I. Injury 2010;41:522-527.
42. Dohnert MB, Venâncio M, Possato JC, et al. Gold nanoparticles and diclofenac diethylammonium administered by iontophoresis reduce inflammatory cytokines expression in Achilles tendinitis. Int J Nanomedicine 2012;7:1651-1657.
43. Li H, Ogle H, Jiang B, Hagar M, Li B. Cefazolin embedded biodegradable polypeptide nanofilms promising for infection prevention: a preliminary study on cell responses. J Orthop Res 2010;28:992-999.
44. Tasker LH, Sparey-Taylor GJ, Nokes LD. Applications of nanotechnology in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;456:243-249. (Pubitemid 46662425)
45. Borm PJ. Particle toxicology: from coal mining to nanotechnology. Inhal Toxicol 2002;14:311-324. (Pubitemid 34259548)
46. Polyzois I, Nikolopoulos D, Michos I, Patsouris E, Theocharis S. Local and systemic toxicity of nanoscale debris particles in total hip arthroplasty. J Appl Toxicol 2012;32:255-269.
47. Sato M, Webster TJ. Nanobiotechnology: implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 2004;1:105-114. (Pubitemid 40227367)
48. Tamura K, Takashi N, Akasaka T, et al. Effects of micro/nano particle size on cell function and morphology. Key Eng Mater 2004;254-256:919-922.
49. Warheit D. Nanoparticles: health impact? Mater Today 2004;7:32-35.
50. Pal N, Quah B, Smith PN, et al. Nano-osteoimmunology as an important consideration in the design of future implants. Acta Biomater 2011;7:2926-2934.
51. Firkins PJ, Tipper JL, Saadatzadeh MR, et al. Quantitative analysis of wear and wear debris from metal-on-metal hip prostheses tested in a physiological hip joint simulator. Biomed Mater Eng 2001;11:143-157. (Pubitemid 32299195)
52. Bozic KJ, Browne J, Dangles CJ, et al. Modern metal-on-metal hip implants. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012;20:402-406.
53. Campbell JR, Estey MP. Metal release from hip prostheses: cobalt and chromium toxicity and the role of the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:213-220.