Differential responses of osteoblast lineage cells to nanotopographically-modified, microroughened titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy surfaces

Biomaterials

Volumn 33, Issue 35, 2012, Pages 8986-8994

  Gittens, Rolando A ^a   Olivares Navarrete, Rene ^b   McLachlan, Taylor ^a   Cai, Ye ^a   Hyzy, Sharon L ^b   Schneider, Jennifer M ^c   Schwartz, Zvi ^b   Sandhage, Kenneth H ^a,b   Boyan, Barbara D ^a,b  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Titan Spine LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone; Metallic implants; Nanostructures; Osteoblast differentiation; Osteointegration; Titanium aluminum vanadium alloy

Indexed keywords

BONE MARROW MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; CELL RESPONSE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE; DIFFERENTIATION MARKERS; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; IMPLANT SURFACE; METALLIC IMPLANTS; NANO-METER SCALE; ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANTS; OSTEOBLAST DIFFERENTIATION; OSTEOBLASTIC DIFFERENTIATION; OSTEOINTEGRATION; PRIMARY HUMAN OSTEOBLASTS; STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS; SURFACE MICROROUGHNESS; SURFACE NANOSTRUCTURE; SYNERGISTIC EFFECT; TI-6AL-4V; TITANIUM-ALUMINUM-VANADIUM ALLOYS; TOPOGRAPHICAL CUES; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR;

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; BONE; CELL CULTURE; DENTAL PROSTHESES; FLOWCHARTING; NANOSTRUCTURES; STEM CELLS; TITANIUM ALLOYS; VANADIUM ALLOYS;

OSTEOBLASTS;

ALUMINUM; NANOMATERIAL; TITANIUM; VANADIUM; VASCULOTROPIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MATURATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ALLOYS; ALUMINUM; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; MALE; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSTEOBLASTS; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; VANADIUM;

EID: 84867141941     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.059     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Jacobs J.J., Andersson G.B.J., Bell J.E., Weinstein S.L., Dormans J.P., Gnatz S.M., et al. United States bone and joint decade: the burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States 2008, AAOS, Rosemont. 1st ed.
2. Fransson C., Wennstrom J., Berglundh T. Clinical characteristics at implants with a history of progressive bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008, 19(2):142-147.
3. Granstrom G. Osseointegration in irradiated cancer patients: an analysis with respect to implant failures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005, 63(5):579-585.
4. Rho J.Y., Kuhn-Spearing L., Zioupos P. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys 1998, 20(2):92-102.
5. 2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. Biomaterials 2009, 30(29):5319-5329.
6. Geblinger D., Addadi L., Geiger B. Nano-topography sensing by osteoclasts. J Cell Sci 2010, 123(9):1503-1510.
7. Mulari M.T.K., Qu Q., Harkonen P.L., Vaananen H.K. Osteoblast-like cells complete osteoclastic bone resorption and form new mineralized bone matrix in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int 2004, 75(3):253-261.
8. Boyan B.D., Schwartz Z., Lohmann C.H., Sylvia V.L., Cochran D.L., Dean D.D., et al. Pretreatment of bone with osteoclasts affects phenotypic expression of osteoblast-like cells. J Orthop Res 2003, 21(4):638-647.
9. Parfitt A.M. The vascular contribution to bone remodeling. J Bone Miner Res 2000, 15(4):823.
10. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009, 20:172-184.
11. Gittens R.A., McLachlan T., Olivares-Navarrete R., Cai Y., Berner S., Tannenbaum R., et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials 2011, 32(13):3395-3403.
12. Tsukimura N., Ueno T., Iwasa F., Minamikawa H., Sugita Y., Ishizaki K., et al. Bone integration capability of alkali- and heat-treated nanobimorphic Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3Al. Acta Biomater 2011, 7(12):4267-4277.
13. Orsini G., Piattelli M., Scarano A., Petrone G., Kenealy J., Piattelli A., et al. Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla. J Periodontol 2007, 78(2):209-218.
14. Collaert B., Wijnen L., De Bruyn H. A 2-year prospective study on immediate loading with fluoride-modified implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011, 22(10):1111-1116.
15. Isa Z.M., Schneider G.B., Zaharias R., Seabold D., Stanford C.M. Effects of fluoride-modified titanium surfaces on osteoblast proliferation and gene expression. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006, 21(2):203-211.
16. Giavaresi G., Fini M., Chiesa R., Giordano C., Sandrini E., Bianchi A.E., et al. A novel multiphase anodic spark deposition coating for the improvement of orthopedic implant osseointegration: an experimental study in cortical bone of sheep. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008, 85(4):1022-1031.
17. Jimbo R., Xue Y., Hayashi M., Schwartz H.O., Andersson M., Mustafa K., et al. Genetic responses to nanostructured calcium-phosphate-coated implants. J Dent Res 2011, 90(12):1422-1427.
18. Kokubo T., Kim H.M., Kawashita M., Nakamura T. Bioactive metals: preparation and properties. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004, 15(2):99-107.
19. 2 nanotubes on titanium substrate. Acta Biomater 2007, 3(3):359-367.
20. MacDonald D.E., Rapuano B.E., Schniepp H.C. Surface oxide net charge of a titanium alloy: comparison between effects of treatment with heat or radiofrequency plasma glow discharge. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2011, 82(1):173-181.
21. Richert L., Variola F., Rosei F., Wuest J.D., Nanci A. Adsorption of proteins on nanoporous Ti surfaces. Surf Sci 2010, 604(17-18):1445-1451.
22. Davies J.E. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface. Anat Rec 1996, 245(2):426-445.
23. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6(12):997-1003.
24. Mendonca D.B.S., Miguez P.A., Mendonca G., Yamauchi M., Aragao F.J.L., Cooper L.F. Titanium surface topography affects collagen biosynthesis of adherent cells. Bone 2011, 49(3):463-472.
25. You M.H., Kwak M.K., Kim D.H., Kim K., Levchenko A., Kim D.Y., et al. Synergistically enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by culture on nanostructured surfaces with induction media. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11(7):1856-1862.
26. Boyan B.D., Bonewald L.F., Paschalis E.P., Lohmann C.H., Rosser J., Cochran D.L., et al. Osteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography. Calcif Tissue Int 2002, 71(6):519-529.
27. Olivares-Navarrete R., Hyzy S.L., Hutton D.L., Erdman C.P., Wieland M., Boyan B.D., et al. Direct and indirect effects of microstructured titanium substrates on the induction of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards the osteoblast lineage. Biomaterials 2010, 31(10):2728-2735.
28. Olivares-Navarrete R., Hyzy S.L., Chaudhri R.A., Zhao G., Boyan B.D., Schwartz Z. Sex dependent regulation of osteoblast response to implant surface properties by systemic hormones. Biol Sex Differ 2010, 1(1):4.
29. Bretaudiere J.P., Spillman T. Alkaline phosphatases 1984, Verlag Chemica, Weinheim, Germany.
30. Boyan B.D., Batzer R., Kieswetter K., Liu Y., Cochran D.L., Szmuckler-Moncler S., et al. Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)(2)D-3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998, 39(1):77-85.
31. Zhao L., Mei S., Chu P.K., Zhang Y., Wu Z. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials 2010, 31(19):5072-5082.
32. 2 treatment and its effects on osteoblast-specific gene expression of hMSCs. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010, 94A(1):169-179.
33. Wilkinson A., Hewitt R.N., McNamara L.E., McCloy D., Dominic Meek R.M., Dalby M.J. Biomimetic microtopography to enhance osteogenesis in vitro. Acta Biomater 2011, 7(7):2919-2925.
34. MacDonald D.E., Rapuano B.E., Deo N., Stranick M., Somasundaran P., Boskey A.L. Thermal and chemical modification of titanium-aluminum-vanadium implant materials: effects on surface properties, glycoprotein adsorption, and MG63 cell attachment. Biomaterials 2004, 25(16):3135-3146.
35. Luthra K.L. Stability of protective oxide-films on ti-base alloys. Oxid Met 1991, 36(5-6):475-490.
36. Du H.L., Datta P.K., Lewis D.B., Burnellgray J.S. Air oxidation behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy between 650-degrees-C and 850-degrees-C. Corros Sci 1994, 36(4):631-642.
37. Aita H., Hori N., Takeuchi M., Suzuki T., Yamada M., Anpo M., et al. The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on integration with bone. Biomaterials 2009, 30(6):1015-1025.
38. Saito T., Hayashi H., Kameyama T., Hishida M., Nagai K., Teraoka K., et al. Suppressed proliferation of mouse osteoblast-like cells by a rough-surfaced substrate leads to low differentiation and mineralization. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2010, 30(1):1-7.
39. Pittrof A., Park J., Bauer S., Schmuki P. ECM spreading behaviour on micropatterned TiO(2) nanotube surfaces. Acta Biomater 2012, 8(7):2639-2647.
40. Webster T.J., Ejiofor J.U. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004, 25(19):4731-4739.
41. Cochran D.L. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999, 70(12):1523-1539.
42. Stein G.S., Lian J.B., Stein J.L., VanWijnen A.J., Montecino M. Transcriptional control of osteoblast growth and differentiation. Physiol Rev 1996, 76(2):593-629.
43. Raines A.L., Olivares-Navarrete R., Wieland M., Cochran D.L., Schwartz Z., Boyan B.D. Regulation of angiogenesis during osseointegration by titanium surface microstructure and energy. Biomaterials 2010, 31(18):4909-4917.
44. Wall I., Donos N., Carlqvist K., Jones F., Brett P. Modified titanium surfaces promote accelerated osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro. Bone 2009, 45(1):17-26.
45. Khang D., Choi J., Im Y.M., Kim Y.J., Jang J.H., Kang S.S., et al. Role of subnano-, nano- and submicron-surface features on osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2012, 33(26):5997-6007.
46. Calzado-Martin A., Mendez-Vilas A., Multigner M., Saldana L., Gonzalez-Carrasco J.L., Gonzalez-Martin M.L., et al. On the role of RhoA/ROCK signaling in contact guidance of bone-forming cells on anisotropic Ti6Al4V surfaces. Acta Biomater 2011, 7(4):1890-1901.
47. Bjursten L.M., Rasmusson L., Oh S., Smith G.C., Brammer K.S., Jin S. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010, 92(3):1218-1224.
48. Mendonca G., Mendonca D.B.S., Simoes L.G.P., Araujo A.L., Leite E.R., Golin A.L., et al. Nanostructured implant surface effect on osteoblast gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2011, 31(8):1809-1818.