Longitudinal variations in fitting parameters for adult cochlear implant recipients;Le variazioni longitudinali dei parametri del mappaggio in pazienti adulti portatori di impianto cocleare

Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 111-116

  Mosca, Francesco ^a   Grassia, R ^a   Leone, C A ^a  

^a MONALDI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adults; Cochlear implant; Fitting values

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FITTING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900528934     PISSN: 0392100X     EISSN: 1827675X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, et al. Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:873-80.
2. Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J, et al. Electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implant: a one year follow-up. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2005;16:127-37.
3. Vargas JL, Sainz M, Roldan C, et al. Long-term evolution of electrical stimulation levels for cochlear implant patients. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2012;5:194-200.
4. Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, et al. Changes over time in psycho-electric parameters in children with cochlear implant. Int J Audiol 2003;42:274-8.
5. Jia H, Venail F, Piron JP, et al. Effect of surgical technique on electrode impedance after cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120:529-34.
6. Berrettini S, Arslan E, Baggiani A, et al. Analysis of the impact of professional involvement in evidence generation for the HTA Process, subproject "cochlear implants": methodology, results and recommendations. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2011;31:273-80.
7. Smoorenburg G. Cochlear implant ear marks. Utrecht: University Medical Centre Ed.; 2007. p. 1-3.
8. Lehnhardt E. Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique. HNO 1993;41:356-9.
9. Cohen NL. Cochlear implant soft surgery: fact or fantasy? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:214-6.
10. Laszig R. Cochlear implants in children (soft surgery). Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2000;57:87-9.
11. James C, Albegger K, Battmer R, et al. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:481-91.
12. Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, et al. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T-and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear 2007;28:495-511.
13. Hughes ML, Vander KR, Brown CJ, et al. A longitudinal study of electrode impedence, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2001;22:471-86.
14. Kubo T, Iwaki T, Ohkusa M, et al. Auditory plasticity in cochlear implant patients. Acta Otolaryngol 1996;116:224-7.
15. Butts SL, Hodges AV, Dolan-Ash S, et al. Changes in stimulation levels over time in Nucleus 22 cochlear implant users. In: Gants GJ, Tyler RS, Rubistein JT, eds. 7th Symposium on cochlear implant in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000;109:53-6.
16. Fayad JN, Makarem AO, Linthicum FH, et al. Histopathological assessment of fibrosis and new bone formation in implanted human temporal bones using 3D-reconsruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;141:247-52.
17. Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clark GM, et al. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 1998;118:313-26.