Analysis of the impact of professional involvement in evidence generation for the HTA Process, subproject "Cochlear Implants": Methodology, results and recommendations;Analisi dell'impatto del coinvolgimento dei professionisti nella produzione dell'evidenza per i processi di HTA, sottoprogetto "Impianti Cocleari": Metodologia, risultati, raccomandazioni

Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 273-280

  Berrettini, Stefano ^a   Arslan, E ^b   Baggiani, A ^a   Burdo, S ^c   Casandro, E ^d   Cuda, D ^e   Filipo, R ^f   Giorgi Rossi, P ^g   Mancini, P ^f   Martini, A ^b   Quaranta, A ^h   Quaranta, N ^h   Turchetti, G ⁱ   Forli, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c Operative Unit of Audiovestibology of the Hospital of the Circolo di Varese   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY MAGNA GRAECIA OF CATANZARO   (Italy)

^e GUGLIELMO DA SALICETO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^g Lazio Sanità Agenzia di Sanità Pubblica Public Health Agency   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

ⁱ SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Clinical effectiveness; Cochlear implant; Cost effectiveness; Health Tecnology Assessment; Registry

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84856952161     PISSN: 0392100X     EISSN: 1827675X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Battista RN. Innovation and diffusion of health-related technologies. A conceptual framework. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989;5:227-48.
2. Battista RN. Expanding the scientific basis of health technology assessment: a research agenda for the next decade. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006;22:275-80.
3. Battista RN. Health care technology assessment: linking science and policy-making. CMAJ 1992 15;146:461-2.
4. Battista RN, Hodge MJ. The evolving paradigm of health technology assessment: reflections for the millennium. CMAJ. 1999 18;160:1464-7.
5. Favaretti C, Cicchetti A, Guarrera G, et al. Health technology assessment in Italy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009;25(Suppl 1):127-33.
6. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. London: Abba Litho 2004.
7. Quaranta A, Arslan E, Burdo S, et al. Documento del Gruppo S.I.O. Impianti Cocleari: Linee Guida per l'applicazione dell'Impianto Cocleare e la gestione del centro Impianti Cocleari. Acta Otolaryngol Ital 2009;3:1-5.
8. Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2009;13:1-330.
9. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness. NICE technology appraisal guidance 166. www.nice.org.uk/TA166.
10. Migliore A, Ratti M, Cerbo M, et al. Health Technology Assessment: managing the introduction and use of medical devices in clinical practice in Italy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2009;6:251-7.
11. Sacchini D, Virdis A, Refolo P, et al. Health technology assessment (HTA): ethical aspects. Med Health Care Philos 2009;12:453-7.