Auditory plasticity in cochlear implant patients

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 224-227

  Kubo, T ^a   Iwaki, T ^a   Ohkusa, M ^a   Doi, K ^a   Uno, A ^a   Yamamoto, K ^a   Fujii, K ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Deaf patients; Dynamic range; Monosyllable recognition; Superior segment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0029868514     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016489609137829     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH. Long-term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage. Laryngoscope 1986; 96: 1083-7.
2. Tyler RS, Kelsay D. Advantages and disadvantages reported by some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Am J Otol 1990; 11: 282-9.
3. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH. Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on patients using a cochlear prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 105: 797-801.
4. Hinderink JB, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Broek van den P. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 618-22.
5. Sutton D. Cochlear pathology. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110: 164-6.
6. Hartshorn DO, Miller JM, Altschuler RA. Protective effect of electrical stimulation in the deafened guinea pig cochlea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 104: 311-9.
7. Leake PA, Snyder RL, Hradek GT, Rebscher SJ. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: Effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. Hear Res 1992; 64: 99-117.
8. Shepherd RK, Matsushima J, Martin RL, Clark GM. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: deafened kittens. Hear Res 1994; 81: 150-66.
9. Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Abbas PJ, Knutson JF, Tyler RS. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 909-6.
10. Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Fisher SG. Prospective randomized clinical trial of advanced cochlear implants: preliminary results of a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100: 823-9.
11. Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler R, Kelsay D, Gantz B. Performance over time of congenitally and postlingually deafned children using multichannel cochlear implants. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 913-20.
12. Shiroma M, Honda K, Yamanaka N, Kawano J, Yukawa K, Kumakawa K, Funasaka S. Factors contributing to phoneme recognition ability of users of the 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101: 32-7.
13. Tyler RS. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 2107-12.