Influence of artifact removal on rare species recovery in natural complex communities using high-throughput sequencing

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Zhan, Aibin ^a,b   Xiong, Wei ^a   He, Song ^a   MacIsaac, Hugh J ^b  

^a RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REMOVAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; COMMUNITY; DNA ISOLATION; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; HABITAT; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MUSSEL; NONHUMAN; PLANKTON; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PYROSEQUENCING; QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES; SCALLOP; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TAXONOMY; ARTIFACT; CHEMISTRY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; STANDARD; STANDARDS;

DNA;

ARTIFACTS; DNA; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; PLANKTON; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84900458220     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096928     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sala OE, Chapin III FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, et al. (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770-1774. (Pubitemid 30143956)
2. Hooper DU, Chapin III FS, Ewel JJ, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, et al. (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75: 3-35. (Pubitemid 40301269)
3. Tilman D (1999) Ecological consequences of biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80: 1455-1474.
4. Chapin III FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PE, et al. (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405: 234-242. (Pubitemid 30313547)
5. Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Callaway RM, Van der Putten WH (2011) Terrestrial ecosystem responses to species gains and losses. Science 332: 1273-1277.
6. Ji Y, Ashton L, Pedley SM, Edwards DP, Tang Y, et al. (2013) Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding. Ecol Lett 16: 1245-1257.
7. Amano T, Sutherland WJ (2013) Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security. P Roy Soc B - Biol Sci DOI:10.1098/rspb.2012.2649.
8. May RM (1988) How many species are there on Earth. Science 241: 1441-1449.
9. Blaxter M (2003) Molecular systematics - counting angels with DNA. Nature 421: 122-124.
10. Fonseca VG, Carvalho GR, Sung W, Johnson HF, Power DM, et al. (2010) Second-generation environmental sequencing unmasks marine metazoan biodiversity. Nat Commun 1: 98.
11. Zhan A, Hulák M, Sylvester F, Huang X, Adebayo AA, et al. (2013) High sensitivity of 454 pyrosequencing for detection of rare species in aquatic communities. Meth Ecol Evol 4: 558-565.
12. Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2011) "Sight- unseen" detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conserv Lett 4: 150-157.
13. Creer S (2010) Second-generation sequencing derived insights into the temporal biodiversity dynamics of freshwater protists. Mol Ecol 19: 2829-2831.
14. Gihring TM, Green SJ, Schadt CW (2012) Massively parallel rRNA gene sequencing exacerbates the potential for biased community diversity comparisons due to variable library. Environ Microbiol 14: 285-290.
15. Quince C, Curtis TP, Sloan WT (2008) The rational exploration of microbial diversity. ISME J 2: 997-1006.
16. Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P (2010) Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol 12: 118-123.
17. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL (2011) Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS ONE 6: e27310.
18. Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Meth 10: 996-998.
19. Bowen De León K, Ramsay BD, Fields MW (2012) Quality-score refinement of SSU rRNA gene pyrosequencing differs across gene region for environmental samples. Microb Ecol 64: 499-508.
20. Bokulich NA, Subramanian S, Faith JJ, Gevers D, Gordon JI, et al. (2013) Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat Meth 10: 57-59.
21. Zhan A, Bao Z, Hu X, Lu W, Wang S, et al. (2008) Accurate methods of DNA extraction and PCR-based genotyping for single scallop embryos/larvae long-preserved in ethanol. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 790-795. (Pubitemid 351989521)
22. Zhan A, Bailey SA, Heath DD, MacIsaac HJ (2014) Performance comparison of genetic markers for high-throughput sequencing-based biodiversity assessment in complex communities. Mol Ecol Resour doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12254.
23. Parameswaran P, Jalili R, Tao L, Shokralla S, Gharizadeh B, et al. (2007) A pyrosequencing-tailored nucleotide barcode design unveils opportunities for large-scale sample multiplexing. Nucleic Acids Res 35: e130.
24. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, et al. (2009) Introducing mother: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7537-7541.
25. Kauserud H, Kumar S, Brysting AK, Norden J, Carlsen T (2012) High consistency between replicate 454 pyrosequencing analyses of ectomycorrhizal plant root samples. Mycorrhiza 22: 309-315.
26. Tedersoo L, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Jairus T, Sadam A, et al. (2010) 454 Pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing of tropical mycorrhizal fungi provide similar results but reveal substantial methodological biases. New Phytol 188: 291-301.