The enemy release hypothesis as a hierarchy of hypotheses

Oikos

Volumn 123, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 741-750

  Heger, Tina ^a   Jeschke, Jonathan M ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENEMY RELEASE HYPOTHESIS; HABITAT TYPE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; INVASIBILITY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 84900441529     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.01263.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Blumenthal D. et al. 2009. Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 7899 - 7904.
2. Catford J. A. et al. 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. - Divers. Distrib. 15: 22 - 40.
3. Chun Y. J. et al. 2010. The role of enemy release, tolerance and resistance in plant invasions: linking damage to performance. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 937 - 946.
4. Colautti R. I. and MacIsaac H. J. 2004. A neutral terminology to define 'invasive' species. - Divers. Distrib. 10: 135 - 141.
5. Colautti R. I. et al. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? - Ecol. Lett. 7: 721 - 733.
6. Fox J. 2011. Zombie ideas in ecology. Oikos Blog. < http://oikosjournal.wordpress.com/2011/06/17/zombie-ideas-in-ecology/ > accessed 28 June 2013.
7. Gurevitch J. and Hedges L. V. 1999. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. - Ecology 80: 1142 - 1149.
8. Hawkes C. V. 2007. Are invaders moving targets? The generality and persistence of advantages in size, reproduction, and enemy release in invasive plant species with time since introduction. - Am. Nat. 170: 832 - 843.
9. Heck K. L. J. et al. 2003. Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. - Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 253: 123 - 136.
10. Hedges L. V. and Olkin I. 1980. Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. - Psychol. Bull. 88: 359 - 369.
11. Heger T. et al. 2013. Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology. - Ambio 42: 527 - 540.
12. Hierro J. L. et al. 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. - J. Ecol. 93: 5 - 15.
13. Ives A. R. and Carpenter S. R. 2007. Stability and diversity of ecosystems. - Science 317: 58 - 62.
14. Jeschke J. M. et al. 2012a. Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. - NeoBiota 14: 1 - 20.
15. Jeschke J. M. et al. 2012b. Taxonomic bias and lack of cross-taxonomic studies in invasion biology. - Front. Ecol. Environ. 10: 349 - 350.
16. Keane R. M. and Crawley M. J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 164 - 170.
17. Koricheva J. et al. (eds) 2013. Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution. - Princeton Univ. Press.
18. Kowarik I. and Pyšek P. 2012. The first steps towards unifying concepts in invasion ecology were made one hundred years ago: revisiting the work of the Swiss botanist Albert Thellung. - Divers. Distrib. 18: 1243 - 1252.
19. Küffer C. et al. 2013. Integrative invasion science: model systems, multi-site studies, focused meta-analysis and invasion syndromes. - New Phytol. 200: 615 - 633
20. Lamarque L. J. et al. 2011. Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits. - Biol. Invas. 13: 1969 - 1989.
21. Lawton J. H. 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? - Oikos 84: 177 - 192.
22. Liu H. and Stiling P. 2006. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. - Biol. Invas. 8: 1535 - 1545.
23. Lowry E. et al. 2013. Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature. - Ecol. Evol. 3: 182 - 196.
24. Maletta H. 2007. Weighting. < www.spsstools.net/Tutorials/ > accessed 11 September 2013.
25. Maron J. L. and Vilà M. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. - Oikos 95: 361 - 373.
26. Mitchell C. E. and Power A. G. 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. - Nature 421: 625 - 627.
27. Mitchell C. E. et al. 2006. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. - Ecol. Lett. 9: 726 - 740.
28. Mitchell C. E. et al. 2010. Controls on pathogen species richness in plants' introduced and native ranges: roles of residence time, range size and host traits. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 1525 - 1535.
29. Norris R. H. et al. 2012. Analyzing cause and effect in environmental assessments: using weighted evidence from the literature. - Freshwater Sci. 31: 5 - 21.
30. O'Hara R. B. 2005. The anarchist's guide to ecological theory. Or, we don't need no stinkin' laws. - Oikos 110: 390 - 393.
31. Roy H. E. et al. 2011. Can the enemy release hypothesis explain the success of invasive alien predators and parasitoids? - Biocontrol 56: 451 - 468.
32. Torchin M. E. et al. 2003. Introduced species and their missing parasites. - Nature 421: 628 - 630.
33. Tylianakis J. M. et al. 2008. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. - Ecol. Lett. 11: 1351 - 1363.
34. Willer C. J. et al. 2010. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide accociation scans. - Bioinformatics (Oxf.) 26: 2190 - 2191.
35. Zaykin D. V. 2011. Optimally weighted Z-test is a powerful method for combining probabilities in meta analysis. - J. Evol. Biol. 24: 1836 - 1841.