Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology

Ambio

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 527-540

  Heger, Tina ^a,b   Pahl, Anna T ^a   Botta Dukát, Zoltan ^c   Gherardi, Francesca ^d   Hoppe, Christina ^e   Hoste, Ivan ^f   Jax, Kurt ^a,g   Lindström, Leena ^h   Boets, Pieter ⁱ   Haider, Sylvia ^a,l   Kollmann, Johannes ^a   Wittmann, Meike J ^j   Jeschke, Jonathan M ^a,j,k  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY AND BOTANY   (Hungary)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^e GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^f BOTANIC GARDEN MEISE   (Belgium)

^g HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

ⁱ GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^k CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES   (United States)

^l MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

Communication platforms; Definitions and terminology; Hierarchy of hypotheses; Invasive alien species; Synthesis; Transdisciplinarity

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMMUNICATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; RESEARCH WORK;

ARTICLE; ECOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; RESEARCH;

COMMUNICATION; ECOLOGY; HUMANS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PERCEPTION; RESEARCH;

EID: 84883792846     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x     Document Type: Review

References (120)

1. Andreu, J., M. Vilà, and P.E. Hulme. 2009. An assessment of stakeholder perception and management of noxious alien plants in Spain. Environmental Management 43: 1244-1255.
2. Arndt, E. 2006. Niche occupation by invasive ground-dwelling predator species in Canarian laurel forests. Biological Invasions 8: 893-902.
3. Aronson, J., J.N. Blignaut, R.S. de Groot, A. Clewell, P.P. Lowry II, P. Woodworth, R.M. Cowling, D. Renison, et al. 2010. The road to sustainability must bridge three great divides. In Ecological economics reviews, ed. K. Limburg, and R. Costanza, 225-236. Boston: Blackwell.
4. Barabási, A.-L. 2002. Linked. The new science of networks. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
5. Bardsley, D.K., and G. Edwards-Jones. 2007. Invasive species policy and climate change: Social perceptions of environmental change in the Mediterranean. Environmental Science & Policy 10: 230-242.
6. Bayliss, H.R., A. Wilcox, G.B. Stewart, and N.P. Randall. 2012. Does research information meet the needs of stakeholders? Exploring evidence selection in the global management of invasive species. Evidence & Policy 8: 37-56.
7. Berghöfer, U., R. Rozzi, and K. Jax. 2010. Many eyes on nature: Diverse perspectives in the Cap Horn Biosphere Reserve and their relevance for conservation. Ecology and Society 15: Art. 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol15/iss1/art18/.
8. Blackburn, T.M., and R.P. Duncan. 2001. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414: 195-197.
9. Blackburn, T.M., J.L. Lockwood, and P. Cassey. 2009. Avian invasions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Blackburn, T.M., K.J. Gaston, and M. Parnell. 2010. Changes in non-randomness in the expanding introduced avifauna of the world. Ecography 33: 168-174.
11. Blackburn, T.M., P. Pysek, S. Bacher, J.T. Carlton, R.P. Duncan, V. Jarosík, J.R.U. Wilson, and D.M. Richardson. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 333-339.
12. Blakeslee, A.M.H., and J.E. Byers. 2008. Using parasites to inform ecological history: Comparisons among three congeneric marine snails. Ecology 89: 1068-1078.
13. Blumenthal, D.M. 2006. Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. Ecology Letters 9: 887-895.
14. Bodey, T.W., S. Bearhop, S.S. Roy, J. Newton, and R.A. McDonald. 2010. Behavioural responses of invasive American mink Neovison vison to an eradication campaign, revealed by stable isotope analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 114-120.
15. Born, W., F. Rauschmayer, and I. Bräuer. 2005. Economic evaluation of biological invasions - A survey. Ecological Economics 55: 321-336.
16. Bremner, A., and K. Park. 2007. Public attitude to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland. Biological Conservation 139: 306-314.
17. Burt, J., A. Muir, J. Piovia-Scott, K. Veblen, A. Chang, J. Grossman, and H. Weiskel. 2007. Preventing horticultural introductions of invasive plants: Potential efficacy of voluntary initiatives. Biological Invasions 9: 909-923.
18. Byron, J. 2008. Safe alternatives to replace invasives in California gardens. California Agriculture 62: 88-89.
19. Callaway, R.M., and W.M. Ridenour. 2004. Novel weapons: Invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 436-443.
20. Capers, R.S., R. Selsky, G.J. Bugbee, and J.C. White. 2007. Aquatic plant community invasibility and scale-dependent patterns in native and invasive species richness. Ecology 88: 3135-3143.
21. Carey, M.P., B.L. Sanderson, K.A. Barnas, and J.D. Olden. 2012. Native invaders - Challenges for science, management, policy, and society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10: 373-381.
22. Carlsson, N.O.L., J.M. Jeschke, N. Holmqvist, and J. Kindberg. 2010. Long-term data on invaders: When the fox is away, the mink will play. Biological Invasions 12: 633-641.
23. Carlton, J.T., and G.M. Ruiz. 2005. Vector science and integrated vector management in bioinvasion ecology: Conceptual frameworks. In Invasive alien species. A new synthesis, ed. H.A. Mooney, R.N. Mack, J.A. McNeely, L.E. Neville, P.J. Schei, and J.K. Waage, 36-58. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24. Carpenter, D., and N. Cappuccino. 2005. Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plants. Journal of Ecology 93: 315-321.
25. Carthey, A.J.R., and P.B. Banks. 2012. When does an alien become a native species? A vulnerable native mammal recognizes and responds to its long-term alien predator. PLoS ONE 7: e31804.
26. Cassey, P., T.M. Blackburn, R.P. Duncan, and J.L. Lockwood. 2005. Lessons from the establishment of exotic species: A meta-analytical case study using birds. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 250-258.
27. Catford, J.A., R. Jansson, and C. Nilsson. 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity and Distributions 15: 22-40.
28. Chew, M. 2006. Ending with Elton: Preludes to invasion biology. Tempe: Arizona State University.
29. Colautti, R.I., and H.J. MacIsaac. 2004. A neutral terminology to define 'invasive' species. Diversity and Distributions 10: 135-141.
30. Davis, M.A. 2009. Invasion biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Davis, M.A. 2011. Researching invasive species 50 years after Elton: A cautionary tale. In Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton, ed. D.M. Richardson, 269-276. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
32. Davis, M.A., K. Thompson, and J.P. Grime. 2001. Charles S. Elton and the dissociation of invasion ecology from the rest of ecology. Diversity and Distributions 7: 97-102.
33. Dehnen-Schmutz, K., and M. Williamson. 2006. Rhododendron ponticum in Britain and Ireland: social, economic and ecological factors in its successful invasion. Environment and History 12: 325-350.
34. Dehnen-Schmutz, K., J. Touza, C. Perrings, and M. Williamson. 2007. The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conservation Biology 21: 224-231.
35. Dickinson, J.L., J. Shirk, D. Bonter, R. Bonney, R.L. Crain, J. Martin, T. Phillips, and K. Purcell. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10: 291-297.
36. Drake, J.A., H.A. Mooney, F. Di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, and M. Williamson (eds.). 1989. Biological invasions: A global perspective. Chichester: Wiley.
37. Driscoll, C.T., L. Kathy Fallon, and K.C. Weathers. 2011. Integrating science and policy: A case study of the Hubbard Brook Research Foundation Science Links Program. BioScience 61: 791-801.
38. Ebeling, S.K., I. Hensen, and H. Auge. 2008. The invasive shrub Buddleja davidii performs better in its introduced range. Diversity and Distributions 14: 225-233.
39. Elton, C.S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
40. Essl, F., S. Dullinger, W. Rabitsch, P.E. Hulme, K. Hülber, V. Jarošík, I. Kleinbauer, F. Krausmann, et al. 2010. Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 203-207.
41. Fischer, A., and R. van der Wal. 2007. Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird - The construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options. Biological Conservation 135: 256-267.
42. Frenzel, M., and R. Brandl. 2003. Diversity and abundance patterns of phytophagous insect communities on alien and native host plants in the Brassicaceae. Ecography 26: 723-730.
43. Fridley, J.D., J.J. Stachowicz, S. Naeem, D.F. Sax, E.W. Seabloom, M.D. Smith, T.J. Stohlgren, D. Tilman, et al. 2007. The invasion paradox: Reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88: 3-17.
44. Gellis Communications. 2008. Scoping study for an EU wide communications campaign on biodiversity and nature. Final report to the Commission/DG ENV.
45. Gherardi, F. 2011. Public perception of invasive alien species in Mediterranean Europe. In Invasive and introduced plants and animals: Human perceptions, attitudes and approaches to management, ed. R.A. Lambert, and I.D. Rotherham, 185-200. London: Earthscan.
46. Gozlan, R.E. 2008. Introduction of non native freshwater fish: Is it all bad? Fish and Fisheries 9: 106-115.
47. Gozlan, R.E., J.R. Britton, I. Cowx, and G.H. Copp. 2010. Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. Journal of Fish Biology 76: 751-786.
48. Gurevitch, J., I.W. Howard, E.A. Ashton, E.A. Leger, E. Howe, E. Woo, and M. Lerdau. 2008. Effects of experimental manipulation of light and nutrients on establishment of seedlings of native and invasive woody species in Long Island, NY forests. Biological Invasions 10: 821-831.
49. Gurevitch, J., G.A. Fox, G.M. Wardle, Inderjit, and D. Taub. 2011. Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. Ecology Letters 14: 407-418.
50. Hayes, K.R., and S.C. Barry. 2008. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biological Invasions 10: 483-506.
51. Heger, T., W.-C. Saul, and L. Trepl. in press. What biological invasions 'are' is a matter of perspective. Journal for Nature Conservation. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.002.
52. Heger, T., and L. Trepl. 2003. Predicting biological invasions. Biological Invasions 5: 313-321.
53. Hodges, K.E. 2008. Defining the problem: Terminology and progress in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 35-42.
54. Hoste, I., R. van Moorsel, and R. Barendse. 2008. Een nieuwkomer in sierteeltbedrijven en tuinen: Cardamine corymbosa in Nederland en België. Dumortiera 93: 15-24.
55. Hulme, P.E. 2006. Beyond control: Wider implications for the management of biological invasions. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 835-847.
56. Hulme, P.E. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 10-18.
57. ISSG. 2000. IUCN Guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/ SSCwebsite/Policy-statements/IUCN-Guidelines-for-the-Prevention-of-Biodiversity- Loss-caused-by-Alien-Invasive-Species.pdf.
58. Jeschke, J.M. 2009. Across islands and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds (Reply to Rodriguez-Cabal et al.). Diversity and Distributions 15: 913-914.
59. Jeschke, J.M., and P. Genovesi. 2011. Do biodiversity and human impact influence the introduction or establishment of alien mammals? Oikos 120: 57-64.
60. Jeschke, J.M., L. Gómez Aparicio, S. Haider, T. Heger, C.J. Lortie, P. Pyšek, and D.L. Strayer. 2012a. Taxonomic bias and lack of cross-taxonomic studies in invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10: 349-350.
61. Jeschke, J.M., L. Gómez Aparicio, S. Haider, T. Heger, C.J. Lortie, P. Pyšek, and D.L. Strayer. 2012b. Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. NeoBiota 14: 1-20.
62. Jogesh, T., D. Carpenter, and N. Cappuccino. 2008. Herbivory on invasive exotic plants and their non-invasive relatives. Biological Invasions 10: 797-804.
63. Jones-Walters, L., and A. Çil. 2011. Biodiversity and stakeholder participation. Journal for Nature Conservation 19: 327-329.
64. Keane, R.M., and M.J. Crawley. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 164-170.
65. Kowarik, I. 2003. Human agency in biological invasions: Secondary releases foster naturalisation and population expansion of alien plant species. Biological Invasions 5: 293-312.
66. Küffer, C., and G. Hirsch Hadorn. 2008. How to achieve effectiveness in problem-oriented landscape research: The example of research on biotic invasions. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 2: 2. http://landscaperesearch. livingreviews.org/Articles/lrlr-2008-2/.
67. Lambert, R.A., and I.D. Rotherham (eds.). 2011. Invasive and introduced plants and animals: Human perceptions, attitudes and approaches to management. London: Earthscan.
68. Levine, J.M. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: Relating local process to community pattern. Science 288: 852-854.
69. Levine, J.M., and C.M. D'Antonio. 1999. Elton revisited: A review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15-26.
70. Lewis, K.C., F.A. Bazzaz, Q. Liao, and C.M. Orians. 2006. Geographic patterns of herbivory and resource allocation to defense, growth, and reproduction in an invasive biennial, Alliaria petiolata. Oecologia 148: 384-395.
71. Liu, H., P. Stiling, and R.W. Pemberton. 2007. Does enemy release matter for invasive plants? Evidence from a comparison of insect herbivore damage among invasive, non-invasive and native congeners. Biological Invasions 9: 773-781.
72. Lockwood, J.L., M.F. Hoopes, and M.P. Marchetti. 2007. Invasion ecology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
73. Lockwood, J.L., P. Cassey, and T.M. Blackburn. 2009. The more you introduce the more you get: The role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Diversity and Distributions 15: 904-910.
74. Lodge, D.M. 1993. Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8: 133-137.
75. Lodge, D.M., S. Williams, H.J. MacIsaac, K.R. Hayes, B. Leung, S.E. Reichard, R.N. Mack, P.B. Moyle, et al. 2006. Biological invasions: Recommendations for U.S. policy and management. Ecological Applications 16: 2035-2054.
76. Mack, R.N., D. Simberloff, W.M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F.A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10: 689-710.
77. Mattingly, B.W., R. Hewlate, and H.L. Reynolds. 2007. Species evenness and invasion resistance of experimental grassland communities. Oikos 116: 1164-1170.
78. McGeoch, M.A., S.H.M. Butchardt, D. Spear, E. Marais, E.J. Kleynhans, A. Symes, J. Chanson, and M. Hoffmann. 2010. Global indicators of biological invasions: Species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Diversity and Distributions 16: 95-108.
79. McGeoch, M.A., D. Spear, E.J. Kleynhans, and E. Marais. 2012. Uncertainty in invasive alien species listing. Ecological Applications 22: 959-971.
80. Meiners, S.J., M.L. Cadenasso, and S.T.A. Pickett. 2004. Beyond biodiversity: Individualistic controls of invasion in a self-assembled community. Ecology Letters 7: 121-126.
81. Memmott, J., S.V. Fowler, Q. Paynter, A.W. Sheppard, and P. Syrett. 2000. The invertebrate fauna on broom, Cytisus scoparius, in two native and two exotic habitats. Acta Oecologica 21: 213-222.
82. Mitchell, C.E., and A.G. Power. 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421: 625-627.
83. Moles, A.T., H. Flores-Moreno, S.P. Bonser, D.I. Warton, A. Helm, L. Warman, D.J. Eldridge, E. Jurado, et al. 2012. Invasions: The trail behind, the path ahead, and a test of a disturbing idea. Journal of Ecology 100: 116-127.
84. Moore, J.L., T.M. Rout, C.E. Hauser, D. Moro, M. Jones, C. Wilcox, and H.P. Possingham. 2010. Protecting islands from pest invasion: Optimal allocation of biosecurity resources between quarantine and surveillance. Biological Conservation 143: 1068-1078.
85. Myster, R.M. 1993. Tree invasion and establishment in old fields at Hutcheson Memorial Forest. Botanical Reviews 59: 251-272.
86. Niggemann, M., J. Jetzkowitz, S. Brunzel, M.C. Wichmann, and R. Bialozyt. 2009. Distribution patterns of plants explained by human movement behaviour. Ecological Modelling 220: 1339-1346.
87. Nisbet, M.C., M.A. Hixon, K.D. Moore, and M. Nelson. 2010. Four cultures: New synergies for engaging society on climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 329-331.
88. Perrings, C., H.A. Mooney, and M. Williamson (eds.). 2010a. Bioinvasions and globalization. Ecology, economics, management, and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89. Perrings, C., S. Burgiel, M. Lonsdale, H.A. Mooney, and M. Williamson. 2010b. Globalization and bioinvasions: The international policy problem. In Bioinvasions and globalization. Ecology, economics, management, and policy, ed. C. Perrings, H.A. Mooney, and M. Williamson, 235-250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90. Puth, L.M., and D.M. Post. 2005. Studying invasion: Have we missed the boat? Ecology Letters 8: 715-721.
91. Pyšek, P., D.M. Richardson, M. Rejmánek, G.L. Webster, M. Williamson, and J. Kirscher. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: Towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53: 131-143.
92. Pyšek, P., D.M. Richardson, J. Pergl, V. Jarosik, Z. Sixtova, and E. Weber. 2008. Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 237-244.
93. Reichard, S.H., and C.W. Hamilton. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology 11: 193-203.
94. Richardson, D.M. (ed.). 2011a. Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
95. Richardson, D.M. 2011b. Invasion science: The roads travelled and the roads ahead. In Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton, ed. D.M. Richardson, 397-407. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
96. Richardson, D.M., and P. Pyšek. 2007. Elton, C.S. 1958: The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Methuen. Progress in Physical Geography 31: 659-666.
97. Richardson, D.M., and P. Pyšek. 2008. Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton. Diversity and Distributions 14: 161-168.
98. Richardson, D.M., P. Pyšek, M. Rejmánek, M.G. Barbour, F.D. Panetta, and C.J. West. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6: 93-107.
99. Richardson, D.M., P. Pyšek, and J.T. Carlton. 2011. A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology. In Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton, ed. D.M. Richardson. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
100. Rodriguez-Cabal, M., N. Barrios-Garcia, and D. Simberloff. 2009. Across island and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds (Reply). Diversity and Distributions 15: 911-912.
101. Sax, D.F., J.H. Brown, E.P. White, and S.D. Gaines. 2005. The dynamics of species invasions. Insights into the mechanisms that limit species diversity. In Species invasions: Insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography, ed. D.F. Sax, J.J. Stachowicz, and S.D. Gaines, 447-465. Sunderland: Sinauer.
102. Simberloff, D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 40: 81-102.
103. Skou, A.M.T., S. Pauleit, and J. Kollmann. in press. Tracing the introduction history of a potentially invasive ornamental shrub - Variation in frost hardiness and climate change. Nordic Journal of Botany. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2012.01399.x.
104. Stohlgren, T.J., D.T. Barnett, and J. Kartesz. 2003. The rich get richer: Patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 11-14.
105. Stohlgren, T.J., C. Jarnevich, G.W. Chong, and P.H. Evangelista. 2006. Scale and plant invasions: A theory of biotic acceptance. Preslia 78: 405-426.
106. Strayer, D.L., V.T. Eviner, J.M. Jeschke, and M.L. Pace. 2006. Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 645-651.
107. Sugiura, S. 2010. Associations of leaf miners and leaf gallers with island plants of different residency histories. Journal of Biogeography 37: 237-244.
108. Tatem, A.J. 2009. The worldwide airline network and the dispersal of exotic species: 2007-2010. Ecography 32: 94-102.
109. te Beest, M., N. Stevens, H. Olff, and W.H. van der Putten. 2009. Plant-soil feedback induces shifts in biomass allocation in the invasive plant Chromolaena odorata. Journal of Ecology 97: 1281-1290.
110. Valéry, L., F. Hervé, J.-C. Levfeuvre, and D. Simberloff. 2008. In search of a real definition of the biological invasion phenomenon itself. Biological Invasions 10: 1345-1351.
111. van Kleunen, M., W. Dawson, D. Schlaepfer, J.M. Jeschke, and M. Fischer. 2010. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecology Letters 13: 947-958.
112. Verbrugge, L.N.H., R.S.E.W. Leuven, and G.v.d Velde. 2010. Evaluation of international risk assessment protocols for exotic species. Series of Reports on Environmental Science: Radboud University Nijmegen.
113. Vignon, M., P. Sasal, and R. Galzin. 2009. Host introduction and parasites: A case study on the parasite community of the peacock grouper Cephalopholis argus (Serranidae) in the Hawaiian Islands. Parasitology Research 104: 775-782.
114. Walther, G.-R., A. Roques, P.E. Hulme, M.T. Sykes, P. Pyšek, I. Kühn, M. Zobel, S. Bacher, et al. 2009. Alien species in a warmer world: Risks and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 686-693.
115. Webb, D.A. 1985. What are the criteria for presuming native status? Watsonia 15: 231-236.
116. Wilsey, B.J., and H.W. Polley. 2002. Reductions in grassland species evenness increase dicot seedling invasion and spittle bug infestation. Ecology Letters 5: 676-684.
117. Wilson, J.R.U., S. Proches, B. Braschler, E.S. Dixon, and D.M. Richardson. 2007. The (bio)diversity of science reflects the interests of society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 409-414.
118. Wilson, J.R.U., E.E. Dormontt, P.J. Prentis, A.J. Lowe, and D.M. Richardson. 2009. Something in the way you move: Dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 136-144.
119. Wolfe, L.M. 2002. Why alien invaders succeed: Support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. The American Naturalist 160: 705-711.
120. Zedler, J.B., and S. Kercher. 2004. Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: Opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23: 431-452.