Choice-based preference elicitation for collaborative filtering recommender systems

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3085-3094

  Loepp, Benedikt ^a   Hussein, Tim ^a   Ziegler, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interactive Recommending; Matrix Factorization; Recommender Systems; User Interfaces

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

ALGORITHMIC TECHNIQUES; COLLABORATIVE FILTERING RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE EXPLORATION; INTERACTIVE FUNCTIONS; INTERACTIVE RECOMMENDING; MATRIX FACTORIZATIONS; PARAMETER COMPARISON; PREFERENCE ELICITATION;

RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84900403635     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2556288.2557069     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Amatriain, X., Pujol, J. M., Tintarev, N., and Oliver, N. Rate it again: Increasing recommendation accuracy by user re-rating. In Proc. RecSys 2009, ACM (2009), 173-180
2. Bell, R. M., Koren, Y., and Volinsky, C. Modeling relationships at multiple scales to improve accuracy of large recommender systems. In Proc. KDD 2007, ACM (2007), 95-104
3. Bennett, J., and Lanning, S. The netflix prize. In Proc. KDD Cup and Workshop 2007, ACM (2007), 3-6
4. Bostandjiev, S., O'Donovan, J., and Höllerer, T. Taste-Weights: A visual interactive hybrid recommender system. In Proc. RecSys 2012, ACM (2012), 35-42
5. Cantador, I., Brusilovsky, P., and Kuflik, T. 2nd workshop on information heterogeneity and fusion in recommender systems (HetRec 2011). In Proc. RecSys 2011, ACM (2011)
6. Chen, L., and Pu, P. Critiquing-based recommenders: Survey and emerging trends. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1-2 (2012), 125-150
7. Chi, E. H. Transient user profiling. In Proc. Workshop on User Profiling (2004), 521-523
8. Davidson, J., Liebald, B., Liu, J., Nandy, P., van Vleet, T., Gargi, U., Gupta, S., He, Y., Lambert, M., Livingston, B., and Sampath, D. The YouTube video recommendation system. In Proc. RecSys 2010, ACM (2010), 293-296
9. Feuerverger, A., He, Y., and Khatri, S. Statistical significance of the netflix challenge. Statistical Science 27, 2 (2012), 202-231
10. Gantner, Z., Rendle, S., Freudenthaler, C., and Schmidt-Thieme, L. MyMediaLite: A free recommender system library. In Proc. RecSys 2011, ACM (2011), 305-308
11. Ge, M., Delgado-Battenfeld, C., and Jannach, D. Beyond accuracy: Evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In Proc. RecSys 2010, ACM (2010), 257-260
12. Green, P. E., and Srinivasan, V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 5, 2 (1978), 103-123
13. Gretarsson, B., O'Donovan, J., Bostandjiev, S., Hall, C., and Höllerer, T. SmallWorlds: Visualizing social recommendations. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 3 (2010), 833-842
14. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., and Riedl, J. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22, 1 (2004), 5-53
15. Iacobelli, F., Birnbaum, L., and Hammond, K. J. Tell me more, not just more of the same. In Proc. IUI 2010, ACM (2010), 81-90
16. Jones, N., Brun, A., and Boyer, A. Comparison instead of ratings: Towards more stable preferences. In Proc. WI-IAT 2011, IEEE (2011), 451-456
17. Karimi, R., Freudenthaler, C., Nanopoulos, A., and Schmidt-Thieme, L. Exploiting the characteristics of matrix factorization for active learning in recommender systems. In Proc. RecSys 2012, ACM (2012), 317-320
18. Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. Recommender systems: From algorithms to user experience. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1-2 (2012), 101-123
19. Koren, Y., Bell, R. M., and Volinsky, C. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Computer 42, 8 (2009), 30-37
20. Linden, G., Smith, B., and York, J. Amazon. com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing 7, 1 (2003), 76-80
21. Mahmood, T., and Ricci, F. Improving recommender systems with adaptive conversational strategies. In Proc. HT 2009, ACM (2009), 73-82
22. McNee, S., Riedl, J., and Konstan, J. A. Being accurate is not enough: How accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM (2006), 1097-1101
23. Pariser, E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You. Penguin Press, 2011
24. Pu, P., Chen, L., and Hu, R. Evaluating recommender systems from the users perspective: Survey of the state of the art. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 4-5 (2012), 317-355
25. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., and Shapira, B. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2010, ch. Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook, 1-35
26. Salton, G., and Buckley, C. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. In Readings in Information Retrieval. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997, 355-364
27. Senecal, S., and Nantel, J. The influence of online product recommendations on consumers online choices. Journal of Retailing 80, 2 (2004), 159-169
28. Sinha, R., and Swearingen, K. The role of transparency in recommender systems. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2002, ACM (2002), 830-831
29. Su, X., and Khoshgoftaar, T. M. A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Advances in Artificial Intelligence 2009 (2009), 1-19
30. Tintarev, N., and Masthoff, J. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2010, ch. Designing and Evaluating Explanations for Recommender Systems, 479-510
31. Vargas, S., and Castells, P. Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In Proc. RecSys 2011, ACM (2011), 109-116
32. Vig, J., Sen, S., and Riedl, J. Navigating the tag genome. In Proc. IUI 2011, ACM (2011), 93-102
33. Xiao, B., and Benbasat, I. E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly 31, 1 (2007), 137-209
34. Zhao, X., Zhang, W., and Wang, J. Interactive collaborative filtering. In Proc. CIKM 2013, ACM (2013), 1411-1420
35. Zhou, K, Yang, S.-H., and Zha, H. Functional matrix factorizations for cold-start recommendation. In Proc. SIGIR 2011, ACM (2011), 315-324.