Functional haemodynamic monitoring

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 288-293

  Pinsky, Michael R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

cardiovascular physiology; minimally invasive monitoring; noninvasive; resuscitation shock

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY TONE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; DISEASE MARKER; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MONITORING; OXYGEN SATURATION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREDICTION; PULSE OXIMETER; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW; VENOUS RETURN; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; MALE; MORTALITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; RESUSCITATION;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESUSCITATION; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 84900398098     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000090     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Pinsky MR. Payen D: Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 2005; 9:566-572.
2. Hadian M, Pinsky MR. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007; 13:318-323.
3. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138.
4. Cannesson M, Ahioy M, Hofer CK, Rehman M. Pulse pressure variation: where are we today? J Clin Monitor Comput 2011; 25:45-56.
5. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variable and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2642-2647.
6. Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, sampling duration and cardiac contractility on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation during positivepressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:2858-2862.
7. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008.
8. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:984-989.
9. Mesquida J, Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:1672-1679.
10. Lanspa MJ, Grissom CK, Hirshberg EL, et al. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic responses to volume expansion in spontaneous breathing patients with septic shock. Shock 2013; 39:155-160.
11. Yazigi A, Khoury E, Hlais S, et al. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26:387-390.
12. Lekhal K, Ehrmann S, Perrotin D, et al. Fluid challenge: tracking changes in cardiac output with blood pressure monitoring (invasive and noninvasive). Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:1953-1962.
13. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:659-663.
14. Biais M, Ouattara A, Janvier G, Sztark F. Case scenario: respiratory variations in arterial pressure for guiding fluid management in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2012; 116:1354-1361.
15. Debacker D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:517-523.
16. Renner J, Gruenewald M, Quaden R, et al. Influence of increased intraabdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med Feb 2009; 37:650-658.
17. Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, et al. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-abdominal pressure: an experimental study. Crit Care 2011; 15:R33.
18. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N, et al. The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:1824-1829.
19. Lopes RL, Oliveira MA, Pereira VOS, et al. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R100.
20. Hadian M, Kim H, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care 2010; 14:R212.
21. Stagt C, Malagon I, Groeneveld ABJ. Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation. Brit J Anaesth 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
22. Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Euro J Anaesthiol 2012; 29:64-69.
23. Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MMRF, et al. Comparison of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waveform-based dynamic preload variables in assessing fluid responsiveness and dynamic arterial tone in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Brit J Anaesth 2013; 110:940-946.
24. Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, et al. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:615-622.
25. Hatib F, Jansen JRC, Pinsky MR. Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock. J Appl Physiol 2011; 111:853-860.
26. Marik PE, Levitov A, Young A, Andrews L. The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients. Chest 2013; 143:364-370.
27. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368-1377.
28. Dellinger R, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:17-60.
29. Giraud R, Slegenthaler N, Bendjelid K. Pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and dynamic arterial elastance. Crit Care 2011; 15:414.
30. Monge MI, Gil A, Garcia RM. Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care 2011; 15:R15.
31. Hadian M, Severyn D, Pinsky MR. The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients. J Crit Care 2011; 26:328.el-328.e8.
32. Cherpanath TGV, Smeding L, Lagrand WK, et al. Pulse pressure variation does not reflect stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated rats with lipopolysaccharide-induced pneumonia. Clin Exper Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 41:98-104.
33. 2 saturation response. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:1600-1607.
34. De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC, et al. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166:98-104.
35. Sakr Y, Dubois MJ, De Backer D, et al. Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 2004; 34:1825-1831.
36. 2 in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:1549-1556.
37. Mesquida J, Espinal C, GraurtmonerG, et al. Prognostic implications of tissue oxygenation in human septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38:592-597.
38. García X, Simon P, Guyette FX, et al. Noninvasive assessment of dyspnea in the Emergency Department. Chest 2013; 144:610-615.
39. 2 saturation response predicts in-hospital mortality in trauma patients. Crit Care Med 2009; 37 (Suppl 12):A28.