Natal habitat effects drive density-dependent scaling of dispersal decisions

Oikos

Volumn 123, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 699-704

  Van Allen, Benjamin G ^a   Bhavsar, Preeya ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT STRUCTURE; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATAL DISPERSAL; PERSISTENCE; POPULATION DENSITY; REINTRODUCTION;

COLEOPTERA; TENEBRIONIDAE; TRIBOLIUM (BEETLE);

EID: 84900384840     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/oik.01240     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agashe D. et al. 2011. Effects of founding genetic variation on adaptation to a novel resource. - Evolution 65 : 2481 - 2491.
2. Amarasekare P. 1998. Interactions between local dynamics and dispersal: insights from single species models. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 53 : 44 - 59.
3. Amarasekare P. 2004. The role of density-dependent dispersal in source-sink dynamics. - J. Theor. Biol. 226 : 159 - 168.
4. Baker M. B. and Rao S. 2004. Incremental costs and benefits shape natal dispersal: theory and example with Hemilepistrus reamuri. - Ecology 85 : 1039 - 1051.
5. Benard M. F. and McCauley S. J. 2008. Integrating across life-history stages: consequences of natal habitat effects on dispersal. - Am. Nat. 171 : 553 - 567.
6. Benton T. G. and Bowler D. E. 2012. Dispersal in invertebrates: influences on individual decisions. - In: Clobert J. et al. (eds), Dispersal ecology and evolution. OUP.
7. Bonte D. and de la Pena E. 2009. Evolution of body-condition dependent dispersal in metapopulations. - J. Evol. Biol. 22 : 1242 - 1241.
8. Bonte D. et al. 2012. Costs of dispersal. - Biol. Rev. 87 : 290 - 312.
9. Bowler D. E. and Benton T. G. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behavior to spatial dynamics. - Biol. Rev. 80 : 205 - 225.
10. Cote J. and Clobert J. 2007. Social personalities influence natal dispersal in a lizard. - Proc. R. Soc. B. 274 : 383 - 390.
11. Clobert J. et al. 2009. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. - Ecol. Lett. 12 : 197 - 209.
12. Davis J. M. and Stamps J. A. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 411 - 416.
13. Fagan W. F. et al. 1999. How habitat edges change species interactions. - Am. Nat. 153 : 165 - 182.
14. Fowler M. S. 2005. Interactions between maternal effects and dispersal. - Oikos 110 : 81 - 90.
15. Fowler M. S. 2009. Density dependent dispersal decisions and the alee effect. - Oikos 118 : 604 - 614.
16. Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. - Nature 396 : 41 - 49.
17. Hanski I. 1999. Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamics landscapes. - Oikos 87 : 209 - 219.
18. Leibold M. A. et al. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale ecology. - Ecol. Lett. 7 : 601 - 613.
19. Marsh D. M. and Trenham P. C. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. - Conserv. Biol. 15 : 40 - 49.
20. McNamara J. M. et al. 2013. An adaptive response to uncertainty generate positive and negative contrast effects. - Science 340 : 1084 - 1086.
21. Melbourne B. A. and Hastings A. 2009. Highly variable spread rates in replicated biological invasions: fundamental limits to predictability. - Science 325 : 1536 - 1539.
22. Mestre L. and Bonte D. 2012. Food stress during juvenile and maternal development shapes natal and breeding dispersal in a spider. - Behav. Ecol. 23 : 759 - 764.
23. Pulliam H. R. 1988. Source, sinks and population regulation. - Am. Nat. 132 : 652 - 661.
24. Stamps J. A. and Davis J. M. 2006. Adaptive effects of natal experience on habitat selection by dispersers. - Anim. Behav. 72 : 1279 - 1289.
25. Stamps J. A. et al. 2009. How different types of natal experience affect habitat preference. - Am. Nat. 174 : 623 - 630.
26. Travis J. M. et al. 2012. Modeling dispersal: an eco-evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behavior and the multiple costs involved. - Meth. Ecol. Evol. 3 : 628 - 641.
27. Van Allen B. G. and Rudolf V. H. W. 2013. Ghosts of habitats past: environmental carry-over effects drive population dynamics in novel habitat. - Am. Nat. 181 : 596 - 608.
28. Via S. 1999. Cannibalism facilitates the use of a novel envi ronment in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. - Heredity 82 : 267 - 275.
29. Zeigler J. R. 1976. Evolution of the migration response: emigration by Tribolium and the influence of age. - Evolution 30 : 579 - 592.