Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes

Oikos

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 209-219

  Hanski, I ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 0032738914     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3546736     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adler, F. R. and Nüernberger, B. 1994. Persistence in patchy irregular landscapes. Theor. Popul. Biol. 45: 41-75.
2. Bascompte, J. and Solé, R. V. 1994. Spatially induced bifurcations in single-species population dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 256-264.
3. Boorman, F. H. and Likens, G. E. 1979. Pattern and process in forested ecosystem. - Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Gardner, R. H., O'Neill, R. V. and Turner, M. G. 1993. Ecological implications of landscape fragmentation. - In: Pickett, S. T. A. and McDonnell, M. J. (eds). Humans as components of ecosystems: subtle human effects and the ecology of population areas. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 208-226.
5. Gustafson, E. J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 143-156.
6. Gustafson, E. J. and Gardner, R. H. 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77: 94-107.
7. Gyllenberg, M. and Hanski, I. 1992. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: a structured model. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 72: 35-61.
8. Gyllenberg, M. and Hanski, I. 1997. Habitat deterioration, habitat destruction and metapopulation persistence in a heterogeneous landscape. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 52: 198-215.
9. Hanski, I. 1985. Single-species spatial dynamics may contribute to long-term rarity and commonness. - Ecology 66: 335-343.
10. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. - J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 151-162.
11. Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. - Nature 396: 41-49.
12. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
13. Hanski, I. and Ranta, E. 1983. Coexistence in a patchy environment: three species of Daphnia in rock pools. - J. Anim. Ecol. 52: 263-279.
14. Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. E. (eds) 1997. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
15. Hanski, I. and Gyllenberg, M. 1997. Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. - Science 275: 397-400.
16. Hanski, I., Pakkala, T., Kuussaari, M. and Lei, G. 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. - Oikos 72: 21-28.
17. Hanski, I., Moilanen, T., Pakkala, T. and Kuussaari, M. 1996. The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation. Conserv. Biol. 10: 578-590.
18. Harrison, S. 1994. Metapopulations and conservation. - In: Edwards, P. J., May, R. M. and Webb, N. R. (eds). Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 111-128.
19. Harrison, S. and Taylor, A. D. 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. - In: Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. (eds). Metapopulation biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 27-42.
20. Hastings, A. and Harrison, S. 1994. Metapopulation dynamics and genetics. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 167-188.
21. Hess, G. 1996. Disease in metapopulation models: implications for conservation. Ecology 77: 1617-1632.
22. Kareiva, P., Skelly, D. and Ruckelshaus, M. 1997. Reevaluating the use of models to predict the consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation. In: Pickett, S. T. A., Ostfeld, R. S., Shachak, M. and Likens, G. E. (eds). The ecological basis of conservation. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 156-166.
23. Klemetti, T. 1998. Punakeltaverkkoperhosen (Euphydryas aurinia) metapopulaatiorakenne. MSc thesis. Univ. of Turku, Finland.
24. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M. and Hanski, I. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the butterfly Melitaca cinxia. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 791-801.
25. Lavorel, S., Gardner, R. H. and O'Neill, R. V. 1995. Analysis of patterns in hierarchically structured landscapes. Oikos 67: 521-528.
26. Levin, S. A. and Paine, R. T. 1974. Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71: 2744-2747.
27. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. - Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15: 237-240.
28. MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
29. Moilanen, A. and Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. - Ecology 79: 2503-2515.
30. Moilanen, A., Smith, A. T. and Hanski, I. 1998. Long-term dynamics in a metapopulation of the American pika. Am. Nat. 152: 530-542.
31. Nee, S., May, R. M. and Hassell, M. P. 1997. Two-species metapopulation models. - In: Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. (eds), Metapopulation biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 123-148.
32. Paine, R. T. and Levin, S. A. 1981. Intertidal landscapes: disturbances and the dynamics of pattern. Ecol. Monogr. 51: 145-178.
33. Simberloff, D. 1994. The ecology of extinction. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 38: 159-174.
34. Sjögren, P. 1991. Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 135-147.
35. Stelter, C., Reich, M., Grimm, V. and Wissel, C. 1997. Modelling persistence in dynamic landscapes: lessons from a metapopulation of the grasshopper Bryodema tuberculata. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 508-518.
36. Thomas, C. D. 1994a. The ecology and conservation of butterfly metapopulations in the fragmented British landscape. In: Pullin, A. S. (ed.), Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 46-63.
37. Thomas, C. D. 1994b. Extinction, colonization, and metapopulations: environmental tracking by rare species. - Conserv. Biol. 8: 373-378.
38. Thomas, C. D. and Hanski, I. 1997. Butterfly metapopulations. In: Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. E. (eds), Metapopulation biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 359-386.
39. Tilman, D. and Kareiva, P. 1997. Spatial ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
40. Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H. (eds) 1991. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. - Springer-Verlag, New York.
41. Turner, M. G., O'Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H. and Milne, B. T. 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. - Landscape Ecol. 3: 153-162.
42. Verboom, J., Schotman, A., Opdam, P. and Metz, J. A. J. 1991. European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. - Oikos 61: 149-156.
43. Warren, M. S. 1987. The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. III. Population dynamics and the effect of habitat management. J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 499-513.
44. Warren, M. S. 1991. The successful conservation of an endangered species, the heath fritillary butterfly Mellicta athalia, in Britain. - Biol. Conserv. 55: 37-56.
45. With, K. A., Gardner, R. H. and Turner, M. G. 1997. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous landscapes. - Oikos 78: 151-169.