Exploring the relationship between nichie breadth and invasion success

Conceptual Ecology and Invasion Biology: Reciprocal Approaches to Nature

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 307-322

  Vazquez, Diego P ^a  

^a LABORATORIO DE ENTOMOLOGÍA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900238627     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4925-0_14     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Arnqvist, G. and D. Wooster. 1995. Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 236-240.
2. Baker, H. G. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. Pages 147-169 in H. G. Baker and C. L. Stebbins, editors. The Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press, New York.
3. Baker, H. G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 1-24.
4. Bascompte, J., P. Jordano, C. J. Melian and J. M. Olesen. 2003. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 100, 9383-9387.
5. Blackburn, T. M. and R. P. Duncan. 2001. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414, 195-197.
6. Brooks, T. M. 2001. Are unsuccessful avian invaders rarer in their native range than successful invaders? Pages 125-155 in J. L. Lockwood and M. M. McKinney, editors. Biotic Homogenisation: the loss of diversity through invasion and extinction. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
7. Brown, J. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist 124, 255-279.
8. Cassey, P. 2002. Life history and ecology influences establishment success of introduced land birds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76, 465-480.
9. Daehler, C. C. and D. R. Strong. 1993. Prediction and biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 380-380.
10. Duncan, R. P., M. Bomford, D. M. Forsyth and L. Conibear. 2001. High predictability in introduction outcomes and the geographical range size of introduced Australian birds: a role for climate. Journal of Animal Ecology 70, 621-632.
11. Dupont, Y. L., D. M. Hansen and J. M. Olesen. 2003. Structure of a plant-flower-visitor network in the high-altitude sub-alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands. Ecography 26, 301-310.
12. Ehrlich, P. R. 1986. Which animal will invade? Pages 79-95 in H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake, editors. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York.
13. Erwin, T. L. 1982. Tropical forests: their richness in coleóptera and other arthropod species. Coleopterists Bulletin 36, 74-75.
14. Gaston, K. J. 2003. The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
15. Gaston, K. J., T. M. Blackburn and J. H. Lawton. 1997. Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. Journal of Animal Ecology 66, 579-601.
16. Goodwin, B. J., A. J. McAllister and L. Fahrig. 1999. Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conservation Biology 13, 422-426.
17. Goulson, D. 2003. Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34, 1-26.
18. Gurevitch, J., P. S. Curtis and M. H. Jones. 2001. Meta-analysis in ecology. Advances in Ecological Research 32, 199-247.
19. Hanski, I., J. Kouki and A. Halkka. 1993. Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. Pages 108-116 in R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, editors. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
20. Henneman, M. L. and J. Memmott. 2001. Infiltration of a Hawaiian community by introduced biological control agents. Science 293, 1314-1316.
21. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22, 415-427.
22. Jordano, P., J. Bascompte and J. M. Olesen. 2003. Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions. Ecology Letters 6, 69-81.
23. Kitayama, K. and D. Mueller-Dombois. 1995. Biological invasion on an oceanic island mountain: Do alien plant species have wider ecological ranges than native species? Journal of Vegetation Science 6, 667-674.
24. Lockwood, J. L., M. P. Moulton and K. L. Balent. 1999. Introduced avifaunas as natural experiments in community assembly. Pages 108-129 in E. Weiher and P. Keddy, editors. Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Martinez, N. D., B. A. Hawkins, H. A. Dawah and B. P. Feifarek. 1999. Effects of sampling effort on characterization of food-web structure. Ecology 80, 1044-1055.
26. McKinney, M. L. and J. L. Lockwood. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14, 450-453.
27. McLain, D. K., M. P. Moulton and J. G. Sanderson. 1999. Sexual selection and extinction: The fate of plumage-dimorphic and plumage-monomorphic birds introduced onto islands. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1, 549-565.
28. McMullen, C. K. 1993. Flower-visiting insects of the Galápagos Islands. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 69, 95-106.
29. Memmott, J. and N. M. Waser. 2002. Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 269, 2395-2399.
30. Morales, C. L. and M. A. Aizen. 2002. Does invasion of exotic plants promote invasion of exotic flower visitors? A case study from the temperate forests of the southern Andes. Biological Invasions 4, 87-100.
31. Moulton, M. P. and S. L. Pimm. 1986. Species introductions to Hawaii. Pages 231-249 in H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake, editors. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. Novotny, V., Y. Basset, S. E. Miller, G. D. Weiblen, B. Bremer, L. Cizek and P. Drozd. 2002. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416, 841-844.
33. Odegaard, F. 2000. How many species of arthropods? Erwin's estimate revised. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71, 583-59 7.
34. Olesen, J. M., L. I. Eskildsen and S. Venkatasamy. 2002. Invasion of pollination networks on oceanic islands: importance of invader complexes and endemic super generalists. Diversity and Distributions 8, 181-192.
35. Pearson, D. E. and R. M. Callaway. 2003. Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 456-461.
36. Prinzing, A., W. Durka, S. Klotz and R. Brandl. 2002. Which species become aliens? Evolutionary Ecology Research 4, 385-405.
37. Rejmanek, M. 1995. What makes a species invasive? Pages 3-13 in P. Pysek, editor. Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. Academic Publishing, Amesterdam.
38. Rejmanek, M. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25, 497-506.
39. Ricciardi, A. and J. B. Rasmussen. 1998. Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: a priority for aquatic resource management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55, 1759-1765.
40. Richardson, D. M., N. Allsopp, C. M. D'Antonio, S. J. Milton and M. Rejmanek. 2000. Plant invasions-the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews 75, 65-93.
41. Roy, J., M. L. Navas and L. Sonie. 1991. Invasion by annual grasses: a case study challenging the homoclime approach to invasions. Pages 207-224 in R. H. Groves and F. di Castri, editors. Biogeography of Mediterranean Invasions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Scott, J. K. and F. D. Panetta. 1993. Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. Journal of Biogeography 20, 87-93.
43. Simberloff, D. and P. D. Stiling. 1996. How risky in biological control? Ecology 77, 1965-1974.
44. Sol, D. and L. Lefebvre. 2000. Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos 90, 599-605.
45. Sol, D., S. Timmermans and L. Lefebvre. 2002. Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Animal Behaviour 63, 495-502.
46. van Klinken, R. D. and O. R. Edwards. 2002. Is host-specificity of weed biological control agents likely to evolve rapidly following establishment? Ecology Letters 5, 590-596.
47. Vazquez, D. P. and M. A. Aizen. 2003. Null model analyses of specialization in plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology 84, 2493-2501.
48. Vazquez, D. P. and M. A. Aizen. 2004a. Asymmetric specialization: a pervasive feature of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology 85, 1251-1257.
49. Vazquez, D. P. and M. A. Aizen. 2004b. Community-wide patterns of specialization in plant-pollinator interactions revealed by null-models. Pages in press in J. Ollerton, editor. Specialization and generalization in plant-pollinator interactions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
50. Vazquez, D. P. 2005. Revisitando el nicho hutchinsoniano. Ecologia Austral, in press.
51. Veltman, C. J., S. Nee and M. J. Crawley. 1996. Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. American Naturalist 147, 542-557.
52. Waser, N. M., L. Chittka, M. V. Price, N. M. Williams and J. Ollerton. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77, 1043-1060.