Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 456-461

  Pearson, Dean E ^a,b   Callaway, Ragan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; PREDATION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0042011263     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00188-5     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Mack R.N., et al. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecol. Appl. 10:2000;689-710.
2. DeLoach C.J. Past successes and current prospects in biological control of weeds in the United States and Canada. Nat. Areas J. 11:1991;129-142.
3. McFadyen R.E. Biological control of weeds. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43:1998;369-393.
4. Howarth F.G. Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36:1991;485-509.
5. Simberloff D., Stiling P. How risky is biological control? Ecology. 77:1996;1965-1974.
6. Simberloff D., Stiling P. Risks of species introduced for biological control. Biol. Conserv. 78:1996;185-192.
7. Strong D.R., Pemberton R.W. Biological control of invading species-risk and reform. Science. 288:2000;1969-1970.
8. Louda S.M., et al. Nontarget effects - the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48:2003;365-396.
9. Louda S.M., et al. Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science. 277:1997;1088-1090.
10. Boettner G.H., et al. Effects of a biological control introduction on three nontarget native species of saturniid moths. Conserv. Biol. 14:2000;1798-1806.
11. Henneman M.L., Memmott J. Infiltration of a Hawaiian community by introduced biological control agents. Science. 293:2001;1314-1316.
12. Louda S.M., O'Brien C.W. Unexpected ecological effects of distributing the exotic weevil, Larinus planus (F.), for the biological control of Canada thistle. Conserv. Biol. 16:2002;717-727.
13. Simberloff D., Stiling P. How risky is biological control? Reply. Ecology. 79:1998;1834-1836.
14. McEvoy P.B. Host specificity and biological pest control. Bioscience. 46:1996;401-405.
15. Secord D., Kareiva P. Perils and pitfalls in the host specificity paradigm. Bioscience. 46:1996;448-453.
16. Frank J.H. How risky is biological control? Comment. Ecology. 79:1998;1829-1834.
17. Thomas B., Willis A.J. Biocontrol - risky but necessary? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:1998;235-329.
18. Callaway R.M., et al. Biological-control herbivores may increase competitive ability of the noxious weed Centaurea maculosa. Ecology. 80:1999;1196-1201.
19. Pearson D.E., et al. Non-target effects of an introduced biological control agent on deer mouse ecology. Oecologia. 122:2000;121-128.
20. Ortega, Y.K. et al. Effects of exotic plant invasion and introduced biological control agents on native deer mouse populations. Ecol. Appl. (in press).
21. Schellhorn N.A., et al. Competition between native and introduced parasitoids of aphids: nontarget effects and biological control. Ecology. 83:2002;2745-2757.
22. van Driesche R.G., Bellows T.S. Jr. Biological Control. 1996;Chapman & Hall.
23. Smith R.F., van den Bosch R. Integrated control. Kilgore W.W., Doutt R.L. Pest Control: Biological Physical, and Selected Chemical Methods. 1967;295-342 Academic Press.
24. Keane R.M., Crawley M.J. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4:2002;164-170.
25. Crawley M.J. Plant Ecology. 1997;Blackwell Scientific.
26. Williamson M. Biological Invasions. 1996;Chapman & Hall.
27. Power M.E., et al. Challenges in the quest for keystones. Bioscience. 46:1996;609-620.
28. Huffaker C.B., Kennett C.E. A ten-year study of vegetational changes associated with biological control of Klamath weed. J. Range Manage. 12:1959;69-82.
29. Wootton J.T. Estimates and tests of per capita interaction strength: diet. abundance, and impact of intertidally foraging birds. Ecol. Monogr. 67:1997;45-64.
30. Julien M.H., Griffiths M.W. Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and their Target Weeds. 1998;CABI Publishing.
31. McEvoy P.B., Coombs E.M. Biological control of plant invaders: regional patterns, field experiments, and structured population models. Ecol. Appl. 9:1999;387-401.
32. McEvoy P.B., Coombs E.M. Why things bite back: unintended consequences of biological weed control. Follett P.A., Duan J.J. Nontarget Effects of Biological Control. 2000;167-194 Kluwer Academic.
33. Moore N.W. The Bird of Time. 1987;Cambridge University Press.
34. Myers J., et al. Eradication of exotic species - reply. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;515-516.
35. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. proposed rule to list the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher as endangered with critical habitat. Fed. Regist. 58:1993;39495-39522.
36. Van Reil P., et al. Eradication of exotic species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;515.
37. Ridenour, W.M. and Callaway, R.M. Root herbivores, pathogenic fungi, and competition between Centaurea maculosa and Festuca idahoensis. Plant Ecol. (in press).
38. Müller-Schärer H. The impact of root herbivory as a function of plant density and competition: survival, growth and fecundity of Centaurea maculosa in field plots. J. Appl. Ecol. 28:1991;759-776.
39. Kennett G.A., et al. Effects of defoliation, shading and competition on spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass. J. Range Manage. 45:1992;363-369.
40. Bais H.P., et al. Enantiomeric-dependent phytotoxic and antimicrobial activity of (±)-catechin. A rhizosecreted racemic mixture from spotted knapweed. Plant Physiol. 128:2002;1173-1179.
41. Marler M.J., et al. Mycorrhizae indirectly enhance competitive effects of an invasive forb on a native bunchgrass. Ecology. 80:1999;1180-1186.
42. Callaway R.M., et al. Compensatory growth and competitive ability of an invasive weed are enhanced by soil fungi and native neighbors. Ecol. Lett. 4:2001;429-433.
43. Goeden R.D., Louda S.M. Biotic interference with insects imported for weed control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21:1976;325-342.
44. Kluge R.L. Prospects for the biological control of triffid weed, Chromolaena odorata, in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 86:1990;229-230.
45. Müller H., et al. Natural enemies and host-plant asynchrony contributing to the failure of the introduced moth, Coleophora parthenica Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), to control Russian thistle. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 32:1990;133-142.
46. Story J.M., et al. Cause and extent of predation on Urophora spp. larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in spotted knapweed capitula. Environ. Entomol. 24:1995;1467-1472.
47. Dray F.A. Jr, et al. Lessons from unsuccessful attempts to establish Spodoptera pectinicornis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a biological control agent of water lettuce. Biocontrol Sci. Tech. 11:2001;301-316.
48. Harris P. Environmental impact of introduced biological control agents. Mackauer M. Critical Issues in Biological Control. 1990;289-300 Intercept.
49. Power M.E. Effects of fish in river food webs. Science. 250:1990;811-814.
50. Spencer C.N., et al. Shrimp stocking, salmon collapse, and eagle displacement. Bioscience. 41:1991;14-21.
51. Polis G.A., Strong D. Food web complexity and community dynamics. Am. Nat. 147:1996;813-846.
52. Huxel G.R., McCann K. Food web stability: the influence of trophic flows across habitats. Am. Nat. 152:1998;460-469.
53. Jefferies R.L. Allochthonous inputs: integrating population changes and food-web dynamics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;19-22.
54. Roemer G.W., et al. Feral pigs facilitate hyperpredation by golden eagles and indirectly cause the decline of the island fox. Anim. Conserv. 4:2001;307-318.
55. Settle W.H., Wilson L.T. Invasion by the variegated leaf hopper and biotic interactions: parasitism, competition, and apparent competition. Ecology. 71:1990;1461-1470.
56. Maddox D.M. Biological control of diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) and spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa). Weed Sci. 30:1982;76-82.
57. Harris P. Effects of Urophora affinis Frfld. and U. quadrifasciata (Meig.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Centaurea diffusa Lam. and C. maculosa Lam. (Compositae). Z. Angew. Entomol. 90:1980;190-210.
58. Zimmerman G., et al. Seasonal variation in the diet of great horned Owls (Bubo virginianus) on short-grass prairie. Am. Midl. Nat. 136:1996;149-156.
59. Maron J.L., Simms E.L. Rodent-limited establishment of bush lupine: field experiments on the cumulative effects of granivory. J. Ecol. 89:2001;578-588.
60. Childs J.E., et al. Serologic and genetic identification of Peromyscus maniculatus as the primary rodent reservoir for a new hantavirus in the southwestern United States. J. Infect. Dis. 169:1994;1271-1280.
61. Losey J.E., Denno R.F. Positive predator-predator interactions: enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology. 79:1998;2143-2152.
62. Denno R.F., et al. Bottom-up forces mediate natural enemy impact in a phytophagous insect community. Ecology. 85:2002;1443-1458.
63. Eubanks M.D., Denno R.F. Host plants mediate omnivore-herbivore interactions and influence prey suppression. Ecology. 81:2000;936-947.
64. Callaway R.M., Aschehoug E.T. Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science. 290:2000;521-523.
65. Klironomos J.N. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature. 417:2002;67-70.
66. Mitchell C.E., Power A.G. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature. 42:2003;625-627.
67. Pemberton R.W. Predictable risk to native plants in weed biological control. Oecologia. 125:2000;489-494.