Potential benefits of drought and heat tolerance in groundnut for adaptation to climate change in India and West Africa

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 509-529

  Singh, Piara ^a   Nedumaran, S ^a   Ntare, B R ^b   Boote, K J ^c   Singh, N P ^a   Srinivas, K ^a   Bantilan, M C S ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

^b INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (Mali)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change factors; CROPGRO Peanut model; Genetic improvement; Heat and drought tolerance; Peanut

Indexed keywords

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

EID: 84899985951     PISSN: 13812386     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-012-9446-7     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aggarwal PK (2008) Global climate change and Indian agriculture: impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Indian J Agric Sci 78: 911-919.
2. Alagarswamy G, Boote KJ, Allen LH Jr, Jones JW (2006) Evaluating the CROPGRO-Soybean model ability to simulate photosynthesis response to carbon dioxide levels. Agron J 98: 34-42.
3. Anothai J, Patanothai A, Pannangpetch K, Jogloy S, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G (2009) Multi-environment evaluation of peanut lines by model simulation with the cultivar coefficients derived from a reduced set of observed field data. Field Crop Res 110: 111-121.
4. Batjes NH (2012) ISRIC-WISE derived soil properties on a 5 by 5 arc-minutes global grid (ver 1. 2), report 2012/01 with data set. ISRIC-World Soil Information, Wageningen, p 57.
5. Birthal PS, Parthasarathy Rao P, Nigam SN, Bantilan MCS, Bhagavatula S (2010) Groundnut and soybean economies in Asia: facts, trends and outlook. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India. (ISBN: 978-92-9066-531-1), p 92.
6. Boote KJ, Jones JW (1986) Applications of, and limitations to, crop growth simulation models to fit crops and cropping systems to semi-arid environments. In: Bidinger FR, Johansen C (eds) Drought research priorities for the dryland tropics. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, pp 63-75.
7. Boote KJ, Tollenaar M (1994) Modeling genetic yield potential. In: Boote KJ, Bennett JM, Sinclair TR, Paulsen GM (eds) Physiology and determination of crop yield. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 533-565.
8. Boote KJ, Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Pickering NB (1998) Simulation of crop growth: CROPGRO model. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton P (eds) Understanding the option for agricultural production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp 99-128.
9. Boote KJ, Kropff MJ, Bindraban PS (2001) Physiology and modeling of traits in crop plants: implications for genetic improvement. Agric Syst 70: 395-420.
10. Boote KJ, Jones JW, Batchelor WD, Nafziger ED, Myers O (2003) Genetic coefficients in the CROPGRO-soybean model: links to field performance and genomics. Agron J 95: 32-51.
11. Boote KJ, Allen LH Jr, Vara Prasad PV, Jones JW (2010) Testing effects of climate change in crop models. In: Hillel D, Rosenzweig C (eds) Handbook of climate change and agroecosystems. Imperial College Press, London, pp 109-129.
12. Boote KJ, Ibrahim AMH, Lafitte R, McCulley R, Messina C, Murray SC, Specht JE, Taylor S, Westgate ME, Glasener K, Bijl CG, Giese JH (2011) Position statement on crop adaptation to climate change. Crop Sci 51: 2337-2343.
13. Cooper P, Rao KPC, Singh P, Dimes J, Traore PS, Rao KP, Dixit P, Twomlow S (2009) Farming with current and future climate risk: advancing a 'hypothesis of hope' for rain-fed agriculture in the semi-arid tropics. J SAT Agric Res 7: 1-19.
14. Craufurd PQ, Prasad PVV, Kakani VG, Wheeler TR, Nigam SN (2003) Heat tolerance in groundnut. Field Crop Res 80: 63-77.
15. Easterling WE (1996) Adapting North American agriculture to climate change in review. Agric For Meteorol 80: 1-53.
16. FAO (2012) URL: http://faostat. fao. org/site/567/default. aspx#ancor. Accessed on: 15 April 2012.
17. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S (1982) Modeling of photosynthetic response to environment. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Zeigler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology, new series, vol 12B. Physiological plant ecology II, vol 12B. Springer, Berlin, pp 549-587.
18. Fischer G, Shah M, Tubiello FN, van Velhuizen H (2005) Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990-2080. Phil Trans Royal Soc B 360: 2067-2073.
19. Gilbert RA, Boote KJ, Bennett JM (2002) On-farm testing of the PNUTGRO crop growth model in Florida. Peanut Sci 29: 58-65.
20. Hammer GL, Butler DG, Muchow RC, Meinke H (1996) Integrating physiological understanding and plant breeding via crop modeling and optimization. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 419-441.
21. Hammer GL, Kropff MJ, Sinclair TR, Porter JR (2002) Future contributions of crop modeling: from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement. Eur J Agron 18: 15-31.
22. Hammer GL, Sinclair TR, Chapman S et al (2004) On systems thinking, systems biology and the in silico plant. Plant Physiol 134: 909-911.
23. Hammer GL, Chapman S, van Oosterom E, Podlich D (2005) Trait physiology and crop modeling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems. Aust J Agric Res 56: 947-960.
24. Hoogenboom G, Jones JW, Wilkens PW, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Hunt LA, Singh U, Lizaso JL, White JW, Uryasev O, Royce FS, Ogoshi R, Gijsman AJ, Tsuji GY (2010) Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT) version 4. 5 [CD-ROM]. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
25. Howden SM, Soussana JF, Tubiello FN, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H (2007) Adapting agriculture to climate change. PNAS 104: 19691-19696.
26. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 881.
27. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 996.
28. Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18: 235-265.
29. Jongrungklang N, Toomsan B, Vorasoot N, Jogloy S, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G, Patanothai A (2011) Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to pre-flowering drought stress. Field Crop Res 120: 262-270.
30. Lal S, Deshpande SB, Sehgal J (1994) Soil series of India. Soils bulletin 40. National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur, p 648.
31. Landivar JA, Baker DN, Jenkins JN (1983) Application of GOSSYM to genetic feasibility studies. II. Analyses of increasing photosynthesis, specific leaf weight and longevity of leaves in cotton. Crop Sci 23: 504-510.
32. Messina CD, Jones JW, Boote KJ, Vallejos CE (2006) A gene-based model to simulate soybean development and yield responses to environment. Crop Sci 46: 456-466.
33. Naab JB, Singh P, Boote KJ, Jones JW, Marfo KO (2004) Using the CROPGRO-peanut model to quantify yield gaps of peanut in the Guinean savanna zone of Ghana. Agron J 96: 1231-1242.
34. Nautiyal PC, Ravindra V, Rathnakumar AL, Ajay BC, Zala PV (2012) Genetic variations in photosynthetic rate, pod yield and yield components in Spanish groundnut cultivars during three cropping seasons. Field Crop Res 125: 83-91.
35. Ntare BR, Williams JH, Dougbedji F (2001) Evaluation of groundnut genotypes for heat tolerance under field conditions in a Sahelian environment using a simple physiological model for yield. J Agric Sci 136: 81-88.
36. Painawadee M, Jogloy S, Kesmala T, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A (2009) Identification of traits related to drought tolerance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Asian J Plant Sci 8: 120-128.
37. Prasad PVV, Boote KJ, Allen LH Jr, Thomas JMG (2003) Supra-optimal temperatures are detrimental to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) reproductive processes and yield at ambient and elevated carbon dioxide. Glob Chang Biol 9: 1775-1787.
38. Prasad PVV, Kakani VG, Upadhyaya HD (2009) Growth and production of groundnut. In: Verheye WH (ed) Soils, plant growth and crop production, encyclopedia of life support systems. Eolss Publishers, Oxford.
39. Putto C, Pathanothai A, Jogloy S, Pannangpetch K, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G (2009) Determination of efficient test sites for evaluation of peanut breeding lines using the CSM-CROPGRO-peanut model. Field Crop Res 110: 272-281.
40. Ritchie JT (1998) Soil water balance and plant stress. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 41-54.
41. Singh P, Boote KJ, Virmani SM (1994a) Evaluation of the groundnut model PNUTGRO for crop response to plant population and row spacing. Field Crops Res 39: 163-170.
42. Singh P, Boote KJ, Yogeswara Rao A, Iruthayaraj MR, Sheikh AM, Hundal SS, Narang RS, Singh P (1994b) Evaluation of the groundnut model PNUTGRO for crop response to water availability, sowing dates, and seasons. Field Crops Res 39: 147-162.
43. Singh P, Boote KJ, Kumar U, Srinivas K, Nigam SN, Jones JW (2012) Evaluation of genetic traits for improving productivity and adaptation of groundnut to climate change in India. J Agron Crop Sci 198: 399-413.
44. Soil Conservations Service (1972) National engineering handbook, hydrology section 4, chapters 4-10.
45. Songsri P, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC (2008) Root distribution of drought-resistant peanut genotypes in response to drought. J Agron Crop Sci 194: 92-103.
46. Suleiman AA, Ritchie JT (2003) Modeling soil water redistribution during second-stage evaporation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67: 377-386.
47. Suriharn B, Patanothai A, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G (2011) Designing a peanut ideotype for a target environment using the CSM-CROPGRO-Peanut model. Crop Sci 51: 1887-1902.
48. Tardieu F (2003) Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci 8: 9-14.
49. Tubiello FN, Soussana J, Howden SM (2007) Crop and pasture response to climate change. PNAS 105: 19686-19690.
50. Whisler FD, Acock B, Baker DN, Fye RE, Hodges HF, Lambert JR, Lemmon HE, McKinion JM, Reddy VR (1986) Crop simulation models in agronomic systems. Adv Agron 40: 141-208.
51. White JW, Hoogenboom G (2003) Gene-based approaches to crop simulation: past experiences and future opportunities. Agron J 95: 52-64.
52. Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteor Soc 63: 1309-1313.
53. Yin X, Kropff MJ, Stam P (1999) The role of ecophysiological models in QTL analysis: the example of specific leaf area in barley. Heredity 82: 415-421.