Determination of efficient test sites for evaluation of peanut breeding lines using the CSM-CROPGRO-peanut model

Field Crops Research

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 272-281

  Putto, C ^a   Patanothai, A ^a   Jogloy, S ^a   Pannangpetch, K ^a   Boote, K J ^b   Hoogenboom, G ^c  

^a KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Crop simulation model; GGE biplot; Multi environment trials (METs); Peanut breeding

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CROP PRODUCTION; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; LEGUME; PLANT BREEDING; SITE SELECTION;

ASIA; EURASIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA; THAILAND;

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

EID: 58149240780     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abdalla O.S., Crossa J., Autrique E., and DeLacy I.H. Relationships among international testing sites of spring durum wheat. Crop Sci. 43 (1996) 1698-1711
2. Annicchiarico, P., 2002. Genotype × environment interactions: challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No: 174. FAO, Rome.
3. Anothai J., Patanothai A., Pannangpetch K., Jogloy S., Hoogenboom G., and Boote K.J. Reduction in data collection for determination of cultivar coefficients for breeding application. Agric. Syst. 96 (2007) 195-206
4. Baker R.J. Tests for crossover genotype-environment interactions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68 (1988) 405-410
5. Banterng P., Patanothai A., Pannangpetch K., Jogloy S., and Hoogenboom G. Determination of genetic coefficients for peanut lines for breeding applications. Eur. J. Agron. 21 (2004) 297-310
6. Banterng P., Patanothai A., Pannangpetch K., Jogloy S., and Hoogenboom G. Yield stability evaluation of peanut lines: a comparison of an experimental versus a simulation approach. Field Crop Res. 96 (2006) 168-175
7. Boote K.J., Jones J.W., and Pickering N.B. Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agron. J. 88 (1996) 704-716
8. Boote K.J., Jones J.W., and Hoogenboom G. Simulation of crop growth: CROPGRO model. In: Peart R.M., and Curry R.B. (Eds). Agricultural Systems Modeling and Simulation. (1998), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York 651-692
9. Boote K.J., Jones J.W., Batchelor W.D., Nafziger E.D., and Myers O. Genetic coefficients in the CROPGRO-Soybean model: links to field performance and genomics. Agron. J. 95 (2003) 32-51
10. Collaku A., Harrison S.A., Finney P.L., and Van Sanford D.A. Clustering of environment of southern soft red winter wheat region for milling and baking quality attibutes. Crop Sci. 42 (2002) 58-63
11. Conelius P.L., Crossa J., and Seyedsadr M.S. Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative model for genotype-by-environment interaction. In: Kang M.S., and Gauch H.G. (Eds). Genotype-by-Environment Interaction (1996), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 134-199
12. Crossa J., Cornelius P.L., and Yan W. Biplot of linear-bilinear models for studying crossover genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci. 42 (2002) 619-633
13. Delacy I.H., and Cooper M. Pattern analysis for the analysis of regional variety trials. In: Kang M.S. (Ed). Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding. (1990), Louisiana State Universitry, Baton Rouge, LA 301-334
14. DeLacy I.H., Basford K.E., Cooper M., Bull J.K., and McLaren C.G. Analysis of multi-environmrnt trials-an historical perspective. In: Cooper M., and Hammer G.L. (Eds). Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement (1996), CAB International, Walingford, UK 39-124
15. Fan L.J., Hu B.M., Shi C.H., and Wu J.G. A method for choosing locations based on genotype × environment interaction for regional trial of rice. Plant Breeding 120 (2001) 139-142
16. Fehr W.R. Principles of Cultivar Development vol. 1 (1987), Macmillan, New York
17. Gauch H.G., and Zobel R.W. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37 (1997) 311-326
18. Gomez K., and Gomez A.A. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (1984), Wiley, New York
19. Goodin D.G., Hutchinson J.M.S., Vanderlip R.L., and Knapp M.C. Estimating solar irradiance for crop modeling using daily air temperature data. Agron. J. 91 (1999) 845-851
20. Hambling J., Fisher H.M., and Riding H.I. The choice of locality for plant breeding when selecting for high yield and general adaptation. Euphytica 29 (1980) 161-168
21. Hartkamp, A.D., De Beurs, K., Stein, A., White, J.W., 1999. Interpolation techniques for climate variables. NRG-GIS Series 99-01. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.
22. Hoogenboom, G., Jones, J.W., Wilkens, P.W., Porter, C.H., Batchelor, W.D., Hunt, L.A., Boote, K.J., Singh, U., Uryaseva, O., Bowen, W.T., Gijsman, A.J., Du Toit, A.S., White, J.W., Tsuji, G.Y., 2004. Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer. Version 4.0, CD-ROM. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.
23. Jintrawet A., Promrit S., and Sringam P. Calculating solar irradiance from recorded daily sunshine duration or air temperature. Agric. J. 18 (2002) S189-S206
24. Jones J.W., Hoogenboom G., Porter C.H., Boote K.J., Batchelor W.D., Hunt L.A., Wilkens P.W., Singh U., Gijsman A.J., and Ritchie J.T. DSSAT cropping system model. Eur. J. Agron. 18 (2003) 235-265
25. Kang M.S. Understanding and utilization of genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding. In: Kang M.S. (Ed). Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding. (1990), Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 52-68
26. Mgonja M.A., Chandra S., Monyo E.S., Obilana A.B., Chisi M., Saadan H.M., Kudita S., and Chinhema E. Stratification of SADC regional sorghum testing sites based on grain yield of varieties. Field Crops Res. 96 (2006) 25-30
27. Navabi A., Yang R.C., Helm J., and Spaner D.M. Can spring wheat-growing megaenvironments in the Northern Great Plains be dissected for representative locations or niche-adapted genotypes?. Crop Sci. 46 (2006) 1107-1116
28. Phakamas N., Patanothai A., Pannangpetch K., Jogloy S., and Hoogenboom G. Dynamic patterns of components of genotype × environment interaction for pod yield of peanut over multiple years: a simulation approach. Field Crops Res. 106 (2008) 9-21
29. Putto W., Patanothai A., Jogloy S., and Hoogenboom G. Determination of mega-environments for peanut breeding using the CSM-CROPGRO-Peanut model. Crop Sci. 48 (2008) 973-982
30. Roozeboom K.L., Schapaugh W.T., Tuinstra M.R., Vanderlip R.L., and Milliken G.A. Testing wheat in variable environments: genotype, environment, interaction effects, and grouping test locations. Crop Sci. 48 (2008) 317-330
31. Russell W.K., Eskridge K.M., Travnicek D.A., and Guillen-Portal F.R. Cluster environments to minimize change in rank of cultivars. Crop Sci. 43 (2003) 858-864
32. SAS Institute, 1996. SAS user's guide. Statistics. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
33. Seyedsadr M., and Conelius P.L. Shifted multiplicative models for nonadditive two-way tables. Commun. Statist. B. Simul. Comp. 21 (1992) 807-832
34. Sujariya, S., 2004. Suitable dates for conducting genetic coefficient determination experiments of peanut lines for breeding application of the CROPGRO-Peanut model. Master Thesis, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
35. Suriharn B., Patanothai A., Pannangpetch K., Jogloy S., and Hoogenboom G. Derivation of cultivar coefficients of peanut breeding lines for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 47 (2007) 605-619
36. Suriharn B., Patanothai A., Pannangpetch K., Jogloy S., and Hoogenboom G. Yield performance and stability evaluation of peanut breeding lines with the CSM-CROPGRO-Peanut model. Crop Sci. 48 (2008) 1365-1372
37. Thornton P.K., and Hoogenboom G. A computer program to analyze single-season crop model outputs. Agron. J. 86 (1994) 860-868
38. Ward J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 58 (1963) 236-244
39. Yan W. GGEbiplot-a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron. J. 93 (2001) 1111-1118
40. Yan W., and Rajcan I. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42 (2002) 11-20
41. Yan W., Hunt L.A., Sheng Q., and Szlavnics Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE Biplot. Crop Sci. 40 (2000) 597-605
42. Yan W., Kang M.S., Ma B., Woods S., and Cornelius P.L. GGE biplot vs AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47 (2007) 643-653
43. Yang R., Blade S.F., Crossa J., Stanton D., and Bandara M.S. Identifying isoyield environments for field pea production. Crop Sci. 45 (2005) 106-113