Does mortgage deregulation increase foreclosures? Evidence from Cleveland

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 126-139

  Xu, Yilan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer financial protection; Home foreclosures; Mortgage regulation; Predatory lending

Indexed keywords

DEREGULATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LENDING BEHAVIOR; MORTGAGE LENDING;

CLEVELAND [OHIO]; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84899958030     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Agarwal S., Amromin G., Ben-David I., Chomsisengphet S., Evanoff D.D. Do financial counseling mandates improve mortgage choice and performance? Evidence from a legislative experiment. Technical Report. Working Paper 2009, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
2. Agarwal S., Chang Y., Yavas A. Adverse selection in mortgage securitization. J. Financ. Econ. 2012, 105(3):640-660.
3. Bernanke B. Financial innovation and consumer protection. Federal Reserve's Sixth Biennial Community Affairs Research Conference 2009, (URL: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090417a.htm).
4. Bostic R., Engel K., Mccoy P., Pennington-Cross A., Wachter S. State and local anti-predatory lending laws: the effect of legal enforcement mechanisms. J. Econ. Bus. 2008, 60(1-2):47-66.
5. Campbell J.Y., Giglio S., Pathak P. Forced sales and house prices. Am. Econ. Rev. 2011, 101(5):2108-2131.
6. Coulton C., Chan T., Schramm M., Mikelbank K. Pathways to foreclosure: a longitudinal study of mortgage loans, Cleveland and Cuyahoga County, 2005-2008 2008, Case Western Reserve University, Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Center on Urban Poverty and Community Development, Cleveland, Oh.
7. Cui, L., 2010. Foreclosure, Vacancy and Crime. unpublished script, University of Pittsburgh.
8. Curtis Q. State foreclosure laws and mortgage origination in the subprime. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 2013, 1-26.
9. Cutts A.C., Merrill W. Interventions in mortgage default: policies and practices to prevent home loss and lower costs. Borrowing to Live: Consumer and Mortgage Credit Revisited 2008, 203-254.
10. Danis M., Pennington-Cross A. The delinquency of subprime mortgages. J. Econ. Bus. 2007.
11. Demyanyk Y., Van Hemert O. Understanding the subprime mortgage crisis. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2011, 24(6):1848-1880.
12. Deng Y., Quigley J., Order R. Mortgage terminations, heterogeneity and the exercise of mortgage options. Econometrica 2000, 68:275-307.
13. Ding L., Quercia R.G., Reid C.K., White A.M. State antipredatory lending laws and neighborhood foreclosure rates. J. Urban Aff. 2011, 33(4):451-467.
14. Ellen I.G., Lacoe J., Sharygin C.A. Do foreclosures cause crime?. J. Urban Econ. 2013, 74(0):59-70.
15. Foote C., Gerardi K., Willen P. Negative equity and foreclosure: theory and evidence. J. Urban Econ. 2008, 64(2):234-245.
16. Gerardi K., Rosenblatt E., Willen P.S., Yao V. Foreclosure externalities: some new evidence. NBER Working Paper 2012.
17. Ho G., Pennington-Cross A. The impact of local predatory lending laws on the flow of subprime credit. J. Urban Econ. 2006, 60(2):210-228.
18. Immergluck D., Smith G. There goes the neighborhood: the effect of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values 2005, Woodstock Institute, (June).
19. Immergluck D., Smith G. The external costs of foreclosure: the impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values. Hous. Policy Debate 2006, 17(1):57-79.
20. Immergluck D., Smith G. The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on neighborhood crime. Hous. Stud. 2006, 21(6):851-866.
21. Jackson J., Kaserman D. Default risk on home mortgage loans: a test of competing hypotheses. J. Risk Insur. 1980, 47(4):678-690.
22. Keys B.J., Mukherjee T., Seru A., Vig V. Did securitization lead to lax screening? Evidence from subprime loans*. Q. J. Econ. 2010, 125(1):307-362.
23. Keys B.J., Seru A., Vig V. Lender screening and the role of securitization: evidence from prime and subprime mortgage markets. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2012, 25(7):2071-2108.
24. Lin Z., Rosenblatt E., Yao V.W. Spillover effects of foreclosures on neighborhood property values. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 2009, 38(4):387-407.
25. Mian A., Sufi A., Trebbi F. Foreclosures, house prices, and the real economy. NBER Working Paper 2011.
26. Nelson L. Foreclosure filings in Cuyahoga County, a look behind the numbers. Working paper 2008, Community Development Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
27. Pennington-Cross A., Ho G. The termination of subprime hybrid and fixed-rate mortgages. Real Estate Econ. 2010, 38(3):399-426.
28. Purnanandam A. Originate-to-distribute model and the subprime mortgage crisis. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2011, 24(6):1881-1915.
29. Quercia R., Stegman M. Residential mortgage default: a review of the literature. J. Hous. Res. 1992, 3(2):341-379.
30. Quercia R., Stegman M., Davis W. The impact of predatory loan terms on subprime foreclosures: the special case of prepayment penalties and balloon payments. Hous. Policy Debate 2007, 18(2):311-346.
31. Richter F., Nelson L., Seo Y. Mortgage delinquencies in Ohio: are loan modifications stemming the tide? Working paper 2011, Community Development Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
32. Rose M. Predatory lending practices and subprime foreclosures: distinguishing impacts by loan category. J. Econ. Bus. 2008, 60(1-2):13-32.
33. Schiller Z., Hirsh A. Foreclosure growth in Ohio 2008. Report, Policy Matters Ohio 2008.
34. Schloemer E., Li W., Ernst K., Keest K. Foreclosures in the subprime market and their cost to homeowners 2006, Center for Responsible Lending.
35. Schuetz J., Been V., Ellen I. Neighborhood effects of concentrated mortgage foreclosures. J. Hous. Econ. 2008, 17(4):306-319.
36. Warren E. Unsafe at any rate. Democracy 2007, 5:8-19.
37. Warren E. Product safety regulation as a model for financial services regulation. J. Consum. Aff. 2008, 42(3):452-460.
38. Whitaker S., Fitzpatrick T.J. Deconstructing distressed-property spillovers: the effects of vacant, tax-delinquent, and foreclosed properties in housing submarkets. J. Hous. Econ. 2013, 22(2):79-91.
39. Xu Y., Zhang J. Nonlocal mortgage lending and the secondary market involvement. J. Real Estate Lit. 2012, 20(2):307-322.