Predatory lending practices and subprime foreclosures: Distinguishing impacts by loan category

Journal of Economics and Business

Volumn 60, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 13-32

  Rose, Morgan J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Foreclosure; Mortgage; Predatory lending; Subprime

Indexed keywords

EID: 38049075377     PISSN: 01486195     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2007.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Breslow N.E. A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing k samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Biometrika 57 3 (1970) 579-594
2. Clapp J.M., Deng Y., and An X. Unobserved heterogeneity in models of competing mortgage termination risks. Real Estate Economics 34 2 (2006) 243-273
3. Deng Y., Quigley J.M., and Van Order R. Mortgage terminations, heterogeneity and the exercise of mortgage options. Econometrica 68 2 (2000) 275-307
4. Elliehausen, G., Staten, M. E., & Steinbuks, J., (2007). The effect of prepayment penalties on the pricing of subprime mortgages. George Washington University, working paper.
5. Farris J., and Richardson C.A. The geography of subprime mortgage prepayment penalty patterns. Housing Policy Debate 15 3 (2004) 687-714
6. Gehan E.A. A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly censored data. Biometrika 52 1-2 (1965) 203-223
7. Harvey K.D., and Nigro P.J. Do predatory lending laws influence mortgage lending? An analysis of the North Carolina predatory lending law. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 29 4 (2004) 435-456
8. Harvey K.D., and Nigro P.J. How do predatory lending laws influence mortgage lending in urban areas? A tale of two cities. The Journal of Real Estate Research 25 4 (2003) 479-508
9. Ho, G., & Pennington-Cross, A. (2006). The impact of local predatory lending laws on the flow of subprime credit. Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis, working paper 2006-009a.
10. Immergluck D., and Smith G. Risky business-an econometric analysis of the relationship between subprime lending and neighborhood foreclosures (2004), The Woodstock Institute, Chicago, Illinois
11. Immergluck D., and Smith G. There goes the neighborhood: the effect of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values (2005), The Woodstock Institute, Chicago, Illinois
12. Kaper S. Bernanke: Predator bill 'would be a good idea. American Banker 172 33 (2007) 1
13. Li W., and Ernst K.S. The best value in the subprime market: state predatory lending reforms (2006), Center for Responsible Lending, Durham, North Carolina
14. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of Thrift and Supervision, and National Credit Union Administration (2006). Interagency guidance on nontraditional mortgage product risks. Federal Register, 71(192), 58609-58618.
15. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of Thrift and Supervision, and National Credit Union Administration (2007). Proposed statement on subprime mortgage lending. Federal Register 72(45), 10533-10537.
16. Peto R., and Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 135 2 (1972) 185-206
17. Prentice R.L. Linear rank tests with right-censored data. Biometrika 65 1 (1978) 167-179
18. Quercia R.G., Stegman M.A., and Davis W.R. Assessing the impact of North Carolina's predatory lending law. Housing Policy Debate 15 3 (2004) 573-601
19. Quercia R.G., Stegman M.A., and Davis W.R. The impact of predatory loan terms on subprime foreclosures: the special case of prepayment penalties and balloon payments. Chapel Hill (2005), Center for Community Capitalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
20. Tarone R.E., and Ware J.H. On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions. Biometrika 64 1 (1977) 156-160