Daily travel behaviour in Beijing, China.An analysis of workers' trip chains, and the role of socio-demographics and urban form

Habitat International

Volumn 43, Issue , 2014, Pages 263-273

  Ma, Jing ^a   Mitchell, Gordon ^a   Heppenstall, Alison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beijing; Tour generation; Tour schedule; Trip chain; Urban form

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; COMMUTING; DEMOGRAPHY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LAND USE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; WORKPLACE;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA;

EID: 84899935637     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson S., West S. Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2006, 36(6):773-789.
2. Beijing Statistical Bureau Beijing statistical yearbook 2010, 2011, China Statistical Press, Beijing.
3. Bhat C. An analysis of evening commute stop-making behavior using repeated choice observations from a multi-day survey. Transportation Research B 1999, 33:495-510.
4. Boarnet M., Crane R. The influence of land use on travel behavior.specification and estimation strategies. Transportation Research A 2001, 35:823-845.
5. Bowman J.L., Ben-Akiva M.E. Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transportation Research A 2001, 35:1-28.
6. Chai Y., Ma J., Zhang W. The residential differentiation of tour-based spatio-temporal decision-making of travel behavior in Beijing. Geographical Research 2010, 29(10):1725-1734.
7. Chen C., Gong H., Paaswell R. Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions.additional evidence on the impact of density. Transportation 2008, 35:285-299.
8. Davidson W., Donnelly R., Vovsha P., Freedman J., Ruegg S., Hicks J., et al. Synthesis of first practices and operational research approaches in activity-based travel demand modeling. Transportation Research A 2007, 41:464-488.
9. Dieleman F.M., Dijst M., Burghouwt G. Urban form and travel behaviour.micro-level household attributes and residential context. Urban Studies 2002, 39:507-527.
10. Ewing R., Cervero R. Travel and the built environment.a meta-analysis. Journal of American Planning Association 2010, 76:265-294.
11. Frank L., Bradley M., Kavage S., Chapman J., Lawton T.K. Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation 2008, 35:37-54.
12. Freedman J., Castiglione J., Charlton B. Analysis of new starts project by using tour-based model of San Francisco, California. Transportation Research Record 2006, 1981:24-33.
13. Hensher D.A., Reyes A.J. Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport. Transportation 2000, 27:341-361.
14. Ho C., Mulley C. Tour-based mode choice of joint household travel patterns on weekend and weekday. Transportation 2013, 40:789-811.
15. Kitamura R. Incorporating trip chaining to analysis of destination choice. Transportation Research B 1984, 18:67-81.
16. Kitamura R. An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation 1988, 15:9-34.
17. Krizek K.J. Neighborhood services, trip purpose, and tour-based travel. Transportation 2003, 30:387-410.
18. Lee Y., Hickman M., Washington S. Household type and structure, time-use pattern, and trip-chaining behavior. Transportation Research A 2007, 41:1004-1020.
19. Lee Y., Washington S., Frank L.D. Examination of relationships between urban form, household activities, and time allocation in the Atlanta Metropolitan Region. Transportation Research A 2009, 43:360-373.
20. Limanond T., Niemeier D.A. Effect of land use on decisions of shopping tour generation.a case study of three traditional neighborhoods in WA. Transportation 2004, 31:153-181.
21. Long J.S., Freese J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata 2001, Stata Press, Texas.
22. 2 from urban travel in Beijing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2014, 45:78-88.
23. Maat K., Timmermans H. Influence of land use on tour complexity.a Dutch case. Transportation Research Record 2006, 1977:234-241.
24. McGuckin N., Murakami E. Examining trip-chaining behavior.comparison of travel by men and women. Transportation Research Record 1999, 1693:79-85.
25. Mcguckin N., Zmud J., Nakamoto Y. Trip-chaining trends in the United States.understanding travel behavior for policy making. Transportation Research Record 2005, 1917:199-204.
26. National Bureau of Statistics of China China statistical yearbook 1999, 2009, China Statistical Press, Beijing.
27. Newman P.W., Kenworthy J.R. Gasoline consumption and cities.a comparison of US cities with a global survey. Journal of American Planning Association 1989, 55:24-37.
28. Noland R.B., Thomas J.V. Multivariate analysis of trip-chaining behavior. Environment and Planning B 2007, 34:953-970.
29. Pan H., Shen Q., Zhang M. Influence of urban form on travel behaviour in four neighbourhoods of Shanghai. Urban Studies 2009, 46:275-294.
30. Primerano F., Taylor M.A., Pitaksringkarn L., Tisato P. Defining and understanding trip chaining behaviour. Transportation 2008, 35:55-72.
31. Pucher J., Peng Z.R., Mittal N., Zhu Y., Korattyswaroopam N. Urban transport trends and policies in China and India.impacts of rapid economic growth. Transport Reviews 2007, 27:379-410.
32. Qin B., Han S. Planning parameters and household carbon emission.evidence from high- and low-carbon neighbourhoods in Beijing. Habitat International 2013, 37:52-60.
33. Small K.A. Adiscrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 1987, 55:409-424.
34. Thill J.C., Thomas I. Toward conceptualizing trip-chaining behavior.a review. Geographical Analysis 1987, 19:1-17.
35. Wallace B., Barnes J., Rutherford G.S. Evaluating the effects of traveler and trip characteristics on trip chaining, with implications for transportation demand management strategies. Transportation Research Record 2000, 1718:97-106.
36. Wang D., Chai Y. The jobs-housing relationship and commuting in Beijing, China.the legacy of Danwei. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17:30-38.
37. Wang D., Chai Y., Li F. Built environment diversities and activity-travel behaviour variations in Beijing, China. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19:1173-1186.
38. Wang E., Song J., Xu T. From "spatial bond" to "spatial mismatch".an assessment of changing jobs-housing relationship in Beijing. Habitat International 2011, 35:398-409.
39. Wen C.H., Koppelman F.S. Aconceptual and methodological framework for the generation of activity-travel patterns. Transportation 2000, 27:5-23.
40. Wu Z., Ye X. Joint modeling analysis of trip-chaining behavior on round-trip commute in the context of Xiamen, China. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2076:62-69.
41. Yagi S., Mohammadian A.K. Joint models of home-based tour mode and destination choices.applications to a developing country. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2076:29-40.
42. Yang M., Wang W., Chen X., Wan T., Xu R. Empirical analysis of commute trip chaining.case study of Shangyu, China. Transportation Research Record 2007, 2038:139-147.
43. Ye X., Pendyala R.M., Gottardi G. An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns. Transportation Research B 2007, 41:96-113.
44. Zhao P. Sustainable urban expansion and transportation in a growing megacity.consequences of urban sprawl for mobility on the urban fringe of Beijing. Habitat International 2010, 34:236-243.
45. Zhao P., Lü B., Roo G. Urban expansion and transportation.the impact of urban form on commuting patterns on the city fringe of Beijing. Environment and Planning A 2010, 42:2467-2486.
46. Zhou Y., Ma L.J.C. Economic restructuring and suburbanization in China. Urban Geography 2000, 21(3):205-236.