Aortic valve replacement via right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy: A propensity score analysis

Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 75-81

  Glower, Donald D ^a   Desai, Bhargavi S ^a   Hughes, G Chad ^a   Milano, Carmelo A ^a   Gaca, Jeffrey G ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Minimally invasive; Propensity score analysis; Right thoracotomy.

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLAMP; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; REOPERATION; STENOSIS; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; THORACOTOMY; TRANSFUSION; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; FOLLOW UP; FORECASTING; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORECASTING; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STERNOTOMY; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899935601     PISSN: 15569845     EISSN: 15590879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000062     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Rao PN, Kumar AS. Aortic valve replacement through right thoracotomy. Tex Heart Inst J. 1993; 20:307-308.
2. Cosgrove DM III, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 62:596-597.
3. Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, Miller JS, et al. Minimally invasive portaccess valvular surgery: initial clinical experience. Circulation. 1997; 96:I-508.
4. Estrera AL, Reardon MJ. Current approaches to minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000; 15:91-95.
5. Tabata M, Aranki SF, Fox JA, Couper GS, Cohn LH, Shekar PS. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in left ventricular dysfunction. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2007; 15:225-228.
6. Kort S, Applebaum RM, Grossi EA, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: echocardiographic and clinical results. Am Heart J. 2001; 142:476-481.
7. Plass A, Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, et al. Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: preoperative planning, surgical technique, and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88:1851-1856.
8. Iribarne A, Karpenko A, Russo MJ, et al. Eight-year experience with minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery. World J Surg. 2010; 34:611-615.
9. Glower DD, Lee T, Desai B. Aortic valve replacement through right minithoracotomy in 306 consecutive patients. Innovations. 2010; 5:326-330.
10. Cunningham MJ, Berberian CE, Starnes VA. Is transthoracic minimally invasive aortic valve replacement too time-consuming for the busy cardiac surgeon? Innovations. 2011; 6:10-14.
11. Grossi EA, Schwartz CF, Yu PJ, et al. High-risk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 85:102-106.
12. Sharony R, Grossi EA, Saunders PC, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery in the elderly: a case-control study. Circulation. 2003; 108(suppl 1): II43-II47.
13. Sharony R, Grossi EA, Saunders PC, et al. Propensity score analysis of a six-year experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004; 13:887-893.
14. Hisamoto K, Sakwa MP, Shannon FL. Which surgical approach is better for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?: a comparison of outcomes between right anterior minithoracotomy and ministernotomy. Innovations. 2013; 8:157.
15. Pineda AM, Santana O, Reyna J, Sarria A, Lamas GA, Lamelas J. Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy. J Heart Valve Dis. 2013; 22:50-55.
16. Ruttmann E, Gilhofer TS, Ulmer H, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of aortic valve replacement by mini-thoracotomy. J Heart Valve Dis. 2010; 19:606-614.
17. Brinkman WT, Hoffman W, Dewey TM, et al. Aortic valve replacement surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and PORT ACCESS groups. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 90:131-135.
18. Wheatley GH III, Prince SL, Herbert MA, Ryan WH. Port-access aortic valve surgery: a technique in evolution. Heart Surg Forum. 2004; 7:E628-E631.
19. Wei L, Wang C, Shen J, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: comparative study of three different approaches [abstract]. Innovations. 2013; 8:136.
20. Sansone F, Punta G, Parisi F. Right minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for the aortic valve replacement: preliminary results. Heart Lung Circ. 2012; 21:169-173.
21. Lardizabal JA, O'Neill BP, Desai HV, et al. The transaortic approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: initial clinical experience in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:2341-2345.
22. Laufer G, Wiedemann D, Vadehra A, Rosenhek R, Binder T, Kocher A. Mini-thoracotomy for sutureless-rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: initial single center experience [abstract]. Innovations. 2013; 8:105.
23. Miceli A, Murzi M, Gilmanov D, et al. Early experience with Perceval S sutureless bioprostheses in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right anteriorminithoracotomy [abstract]. Innovations. 2013; 8:104.
24. Arom KV, Emery RW, Kshettry VR, Janey PA. Comparison between portaccess and less invasive valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68: 1525-1528.
25. Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, O'Brien SM, Rankin JS, Griffith BP. J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery. Lessinvasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 90:1401-1410, 1410.e1.
26. Falk V, Cheng DC, Martin J, et al. Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (ISMICS) 2010. Innovations. 2011; 6:66-76.
27. Bridgewater B, Steyn RS, Ray S, Hooper T. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a transverse sternotomy: a word of caution. Heart. 1998; 79:605-607.
28. Glower DD, Siegel LC, Galloway AC, et al. Predictors of operative time in multicenter port-access valve registry: institutional differences in learning. Heart Surg Forum. 2001; 4:40-46.
29. Colvin SB, Grossi EA, Ribakove G, Galloway AC. Minimally invasive aortic and mitral valve operation. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 5:212-220.
30. Kypson AP, Glower DD. Port-access approach for combined aortic and mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73:1657-1658.
31. Foghsgaard S, Schmidt TA, Kjaergard HK. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: late conversion to full sternotomy doubles operative time. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009; 36:293-297.