Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: A consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010

Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 66-76

  Falk, Volkmar ^a   Cheng, Davy C H ^b   Martin, Janet ^b,c   Diegeler, Anno ^d   Folliguet, Thierry A ^e   Nifong, L Wiley ^f   Perier, Patrick ^d   Raanani, Ehud ^g   Smith, J Michael ^h   Seeburger, Joerg ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^d Cardiovascular Clinic Bad Neustadt   (Germany)

^e INSTITUT MUTUALISTE MONTSOURIS   (France)

^f EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^h Vascular and Thoracic Surgeons Inc ^*  (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG HEART CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consensus statement; Minimally invasive; Mitral valve surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OPERATING ROOM; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; STERNOTOMY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THORACOTOMY;

EID: 79955599977     PISSN: 15569845     EISSN: 15590879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e318216be5c     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Raanani E, Spiegelstein D, Sternik L, et al. Quality of mitral valve repair: Median sternotomy versus port-access approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:86-90.
2. Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardol. 2010;56:455-462.
3. Seeburger J, Borger MA, Doll N, et al. Comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:532-538.
4. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
5. Cheng DCH, Martin J, Lal A, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Innovations. 2011;6:84-103.
6. Ad N, Cheng D, Martin J, et al. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: A consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2009. Innovations. 2010;5:74-83.
7. Pepper J, Cheng D, Stanbridge R, et al. Stentless versus stented bio- prosthetic aortic valves: A consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2008.
8. Downey R, Cheng D, Kernstine K, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery in lung cancer resection: A consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2007. Innovations. 2007;2:293-302. (Pubitemid 351323203)
9. Diegeler A, Cheng D, Allen K, et al. Transmyocardial laser revascularization: A consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2006. Innovations. 2006;1: 314-322.
10. Allen K, Cheng D, Clhn W, et al. Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (ISMICS) 2005. Innovations. 2005;1:51-60.
11. Puskas JD, Cheng D, Knight J, et al. Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis and consensus statement from the 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference. Innovations. 2005; 1:3-27.
12. Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F. How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I. Medical. Stat Med. 1989;8:441-454. (Pubitemid 19105892)
13. Milz S, Colditz GA, Mosteller F. How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. II. Surgical. Stat Med. 1989;8:455-466. (Pubitemid 19105893)
14. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 1998;22:609-613. (Pubitemid 28380142)
15. Schulz KF, Chalmer I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408-412.
16. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: Developing guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:593-596.
17. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2005;102: 188-203. (Pubitemid 40082856)
18. Anselmi A, Possati G, Gaudino M. Postoperative inflammatory reaction and atrial fibrillation: Simple correlation or causation? Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:326-333.
19. Chitwood WR Jr, Wxon C, Elbeery J, et al. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114: 773-782. (Pubitemid 27495866)
20. Felger JE, Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong L, Holbert D. Evolution of mitral valve surgery: Toward a totally endoscopic approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1203-1209. (Pubitemid 32938007)
21. Shinfeld A, Kachel E, Paz Y, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral and aortic valve surgery-our initial clinical experience. Israel Med Assoc J. 2003;5:482-484. (Pubitemid 36992227)
22. Hibble A, Kanka D, Pencheon D, Pooles F. Guidelines in general practice: The new Tower of Babel? BMJ. 1998;317:862-863. (Pubitemid 28434556)
23. Appraisal of Guidelines RaEiEACG. Guideline development in Europe. An international comparison. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000; 16:1039-1049.
24. Cluzeau FA, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw JM, et al. Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11:21-28. (Pubitemid 29100340)
25. Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1986;89(2 suppl):2S-3S. (Pubitemid 16091376)
26. Proceedings of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-based guidelines. Chest. 2004; 126(3 suppl):174S- 696S.