Assessment of personality functioning: Validity of the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis axis IV (Structure)

Psychopathology

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 185-193

  Doering, Stephan ^a   Burgmer, Markus ^b   Heuft, Gereon ^b   Menke, Dina ^e   Bäumer, Brigitta ^e   Lübking, Margit ^c   Feldmann, Marcus ^d   Schneider, Gudrun ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c Alexianer Krankenhaus   (Germany)

^d St Vinzenz Hospital Rhede   (Germany)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis; Personality disorder; Personality functioning; Reliability; Severity of personality disturbance; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84899930945     PISSN: 02544962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000355062     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Tyrer P, Crawford M, Mulder R: Reclassifying personality disorders. Lancet 2011; 377: 1814-1815.
2. Bender DS, Morey LC, Skodol AE: Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5. 1. A review of theory and methods. J Pers Assess 2011; 93: 332-346.
3. Morey LC, Berghuis H, Bender DS, Verheul R, Krueger RF, Skodol AE: Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5. 2. Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. J Pers Assess 2011; 93: 347-353.
4. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, ed 5. Washington, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.
5. Freud S: Die Traumdeutung. Gesammelte Werke. Frankfurt am Main, Fischer Taschenbuchverlag, 1900/1999, vol 2/3.
6. Freud S: Die Freudsche psychoanalytische Methode. Gesammelte Werke. Frankfurt am Main, Fischer Taschenbuchverlag, 1904/1999, vol 5.
7. Kernberg OF: Severe Personality Disorders. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1984.
8. Clarkin JF, Yeomans FE, Kernberg OF: Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder. Washington, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2006.
9. Kernberg OF: The structural interviewing. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1981; 4: 169-195.
10. Clarkin JF, Caligor E, Stern B, Kernberg OF: Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO). New York, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 2003.
11. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 4. Washington, American Psychiatric Publishing, 1994.
12. World Health Organization: Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1991, chapt V: Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines.
13. Arbeitskreis OPD: Operationalisierte psychodynamische Diagnostik-OPD. Grundlagen und Manual. Bern, Huber, 1996.
14. OPD Task Force: Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics-OPD. Foundations and Manual. Kirkland, Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, 2001.
15. Cierpka M, Rudolf G, Grande T, Stasch M, Task Force OPD: Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD). Clinical relevance, reliability and validity. Psychopathology 2007; 40: 209-220.
16. Arbeitskreis OPD: Operationalisierte Psychodynamische Diagnostik-OPD-2. Das Manual fur Diagnostik und Therapieplanung. Bern, Huber, 2006.
17. OPD Task Force: Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis-OPD-2. Manual of Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. Cambridge, Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, 2008.
18. Diagnostics (OPD) System; in Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual Task Force (ed): Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual. Silver Spring, Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations, 2006, pp 615-662.
19. Hartmann H: Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York, International Universities Press, 1964.
20. Wittchen HU, Zaudig M, Fydrich T: SKID-I: Strukturiertes klinisches Interview fur DSMIV, Achse I. Gottingen, Hogrefe, 1997.
21. Fydrich T, Renneberg B, Schmitz B, Wittchen HU: SKID-II: Strukturiertes klinisches Interview fur DSM-IV, Achse II: Personlichkeitsstorungen. Gottingen, Hogrefe, 1997.
22. Leichsenring F: Borderline Personlichkeits-Inventar (BPI). Gottingen, Hogrefe, 1997.
23. Leichsenring F: Development and First Results of the Borderline Personality Inventory: A Self-Report Instrument for Assessing Borderline Personality Organization. J Pers Assess 1999; 73: 45-63.
24. Leichsenring F, Kunst H, Hoyer J: Borderline personality organization in violent offenders: correlations of identity diffusion and primitive defense mechanisms with antisocial features, neuroticism, and interpersonal problems. Bull Menninger Clin 2003; 67: 314-327.
25. Hentschel U, Kiessling M, Wiemers M: Fragebogen zu Konfliktbewaltigungsstrategien-FKBS. Gottingen, Beltz, 1998.
26. Gleser GC, Ihilevich D: An objective instrument for measuring defense mechanisms. J Consult Clin Psychol 1969; 33: 51-60.
27. Spielberger CD: State-Trait-Anger-Expression-Inventory (STAXI). Research Edition. Odessa, Psychological Assessment Resources, 1988.
28. Schwenkmezger P, Hodapp V, Spielberger CD: Das State-Trait- Argerausdrucks-Inventar-STAXI. Bern, Huber, 1992.
29. Behr M, Becker M: Skalen zum Erleben von Emotionen-SEE. Gottingen, Hogrefe, 2004.
30. Taylor GJ, Ryan DP, Bagby RM: Toward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale. Psychother Psychosom 1985; 44: 191-199.
31. Kupfer J, Brosig B, Brahler E: Toronto-Alexithymie-Skala-26-TAS-26. Gottingen, Hogrefe, 2001.
32. Deusinger IM: Die Frankfurter Selbstkonzeptskalen (FSKN). Gottingen, Hogrefe, 1996.
33. Deusinger IM: Die Frankfurter Korperkonzeptskalen (FKKS). Gottingen, Hogrefe, 1998.
34. Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR: Self-report measurement of adult attachment: an integrative overview; in Simpson JA, Rholes WS (eds): Attachment Theory and Close Relationships. New York, Guilford, 1998, pp 46-76.
35. Neumann E, Rohmann E, Bierhoff HW: Entwicklung und Validierung von Skalen zur Erfassung von Vermeidung und Angst in Partnerschaften-Der Bochumer Bindungsfragebogen (BoBi). Diagnostica 2007; 53: 33-47.
36. Rosenberg M: Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1965.
37. Badura B, Kaufhold G, Lehmann H, Pfaff H, Schott T, Waltz M: Leben mit dem Herzinfarkt. Eine sozialepidemiologische Studie. Berlin, Springer, 1987.
38. Benecke C, Koschier A, Peham D, Bock A, Dahlbender RW, Biebl W, Doering S: Erste Ergebnisse zu Reliabilitat und Validitat der OPD-2 Strukturachse. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2009; 55: 84-96.
39. Freyberger HJ, Dierse B, Schneider W, Strauss B, Heuft G, Schauenburg H, Pouget-Schors D, Seidler G, Kuchenhoff J, Janssen PL, Hoffmann SO: Operationalisierte psychodynamische Diagnostik (OPD) in der Erprobung-Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen Anwendungs-und Praktikabilitatsstudie. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1996; 46: 356-365.
40. Rudolf G, Grande T, Oberbracht C, Jakobsen T: Erste empirische Untersuchungen zu einem neuen diagnostischen System: Die Operationalisierte Psychodynamische Diagnostik (OPD). Z Psychosom Med Psychother 1996; 42: 343-357.
41. Boker H, Himmighoffen H, Straub M, Schopper C, Endrass J, Kuechenhoff B, Weber S, Hell D: Deliberate self-harm in female patients with affective disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis 2008; 196: 734-751.
42. Nitzgen D, Brunger M: Operationalisierte psychodynamische Diagnostik in der Rehabilitationsklinik Birkenbuck: Einsatz und Befunde; in Schneider W, Freyberger HJ (eds): Was leistet die OPD? Empirische Befunde und klinische Erfahrungen mit der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik. Bern, Huber, 2000, pp 238-252.
43. Spitzer C, Michels-Lucht F, Siebel U, Freyberger HJ: Die Strukturachse der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD): Zusammenhange mit soziodemographischen, klinischen und psychopathologischen Merkmalen sowie kategorialen Diagnosen. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2002; 52: 392-397.
44. Heuft G, Jakobsen T, Kriebel R, Schneider W, Rudolf G, OPD-Task Force: Potenzial der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD) fur die Qualitatssicherung. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2005; 51: 261-276.
45. Zimmermann J, Ehrenthal JC, Cierpka M, Schauenburg H, Doering S, Benecke C: Assessing the level of structural integration using Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD): implications for DSM-5. J Pers Assess 2012; 94: 522-532.