Condenser: A statistical aggregation tool for multi-sample quantitative proteomic data from Matrix Science Mascot Distiller™

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 103, Issue , 2014, Pages 261-266

  Knudsen, Anders Dahl ^b   Bennike, Tue ^a   Kjeldal, Henrik ^a   Birkelund, Svend ^a   Otzen, Daniel Erik ^b   Stensballe, Allan ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Mascot Distiller; Proteomics; Quantitation; SQL; Statistics

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; NITROGEN 15; PEPTIDE; STABLE ISOTOPE;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL LABELING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONDENSER; DATA BASE; DATA MINING; FILTRATION; ISOTOPE LABELING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; WORKFLOW; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84899860117     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Perez-Riverol Y., Hermjakob H., Kohlbacher O., Martens L., Creasy D., Cox J., et al. Computational proteomics pitfalls and challenges: HavanaBioinfo 2012 Workshop report. J Proteome Jul 11 2013, 87:134-138. 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.01.019.
2. Muth T., Peters J., Blackburn J., Rapp E., Martens L. ProteoCloud: A full-featured open source proteomics cloud computing pipeline. J Proteome Aug 2 2013, 88:104-108. 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.12.026.
3. Ong S.-E., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat Chem Biol 2005, 1(5):252-262.
4. Huang X., Liu M., Nold M.J., Tian C., Fu K., Zheng J., et al. Software for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling and data independent acquisition. Anal Chem 2011, 83(18):6971-6979.
5. Matthiesen R., Bunkenborg J., Stensballe A., Jensen O.N., Welinder K.G., Bauw G. Database-independent, database-dependent, and extended interpretation of peptide mass spectra in VEMS V2.0. Proteomics 2004, 4(9):2583-2593.
6. Matthiesen R. Useful mass spectrometry programs freely available on the internet. Mass spectrometry data analysis in proteomics 2007, 303-305. Humana Press. R. Matthiesen (Ed.).
7. Cox J., Mann M. Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annu Rev Biochem Jul. 2011, 80:273-299.
8. Matthiesen R., Azevedo L., Amorim A., Carvalho A.S. Discussion on common data analysis strategies used in MS-based proteomics. Proteomics 2011, 11(4):604-619.
9. Matthiesen R. Methods, algorithms and tools in computational proteomics: a practical point of view. Proteomics 2007, 7(16):2815-2832.
10. Huang X., Tolmachev A.V., Shen Y., Liu M., Huang L., Zhang Z., et al. UNiquant, a program for quantitative proteomics analysis using stable isotope labeling. J Proteome Res 2010, 10(3):1228-1237.
11. Almeida B, Kjeldal H, Lolas I, Knudsen AD, Carvalho G, Nielsen KL, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of ibuprofen-degrading Patulibacter sp. strain I11. Biodegradation, s. 1-16. Sep;24(5):615-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10532-012-9610-5.
12. Dyrlund T.F., Poulsen E.T., Scavenius C., Sanggaard K.W., Enghild J.J. MS Data Miner: a web-based software tool to analyze, compare, and share mass spectrometry protein identifications. Proteomics 2012, 12(18):2792-2796.
13. Silva J.C., Denny R., Dorschel C., Gorenstein M.V., Li G.-Z., Richardson K., et al. Simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics Apr. 2006, 5(4):589-607.
14. Qi D., Brownridge P., Xia D., Mackay K., Gonzalez-Galarza F.F., Kenyani J., et al. A software toolkit and interface for performing stable isotope labeling and top 3 quantification using progenesis LC-MS. OMICS Sep. 2012, 16(9):489-495.
15. Colaert N., Vandekerckhove J., Martens L., Gevaert K. A case study on the comparison of different software tools for automated quantification of peptides. Gel-free proteomics 2011, 373-398. Humana Press. K. Gevaert, J. Vandekerckhove (Eds.).
16. Savitski M.M., Nielsen M.L., Zubarev R.A. New data base-independent, sequence tag-based scoring of peptide MS/MS data validates Mowse scores, recovers below threshold data, singles out modified peptides, and assesses the quality of MS/MS techniques. Mol Cell Proteomics Jan. 2005, 4(8):1180-1188.
17. Pappin D.J.C., Hojrup P., Bleasby A.J. Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting. Curr Biol Jun. 1993, 3(6):327-332.
18. Kim P.D., Patel B.B., Yeung A.T. Isobaric labeling and data normalization without requiring protein quantitation. J Biomol Tech Apr. 2012, 23(1):11-23.
19. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat Jan. 1979, 6(2):65-70.
20. Ludbrook J. Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Dec. 1998, 25(12):1032-1037.
21. Abdi H. Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure. Encycl Res Des 2010, 573-577.
22. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol Jan. 1995, 57(1):289-300.